Sinicization and test of reliability and validity of Chinese version of Hybrid Education Competence Instrument

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.02.015

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective The Hybrid Education Competence Instrument（HybridEduCom） was sinicized，and its reliability and validity were tested. Methods The translation，cultural adjustment and pre-investigation of HybridEduCom were followed by the Brislin translation model. The reliability and validity of the HybridEduCom was tested by surveying 553 educators in medical and nursing related fields by convenience sampling from March to April 2024. Results The Chinese version of HybridEduCom consisted of 46 items in 5 dimensions：planning and resourcing competence，technology competence，interaction competence，digital pedagogy competence，and ethical competence in the hybrid education. The confirmatory factor analysis resulted in the second-order five-factor model，with the chi-square and degree of freedom ratio being 1.274，approximate root mean square error being 0.022，goodness of fit index being 0.913，and standard fit index（NFI） being 0.934，and Tucker-Lewis and comparative fit index being 0.985. All main evaluation indexes were within the acceptable range of the judgment criteria. The item-content validity index was 0.833-1.000，and the scale-content validity index was 0.968. The Cronbach’s α for the whole scale was 0.982，while varied from 0.892 to 0.936 for each dimension. The test-retest reliability of the scale was 0.978. Conclusion The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of HybridEduCom were satisfactory，and it can serve as a valid assessment instrument for the implementation of hybrid education competence of Chinese higher medical and nursing educators.

Key words: Education, Nursing, Hybrid Education Competence, Reliability, Validity, Scale

摘要：

目的对混合式教学能力评估量表（Hybrid Education Competence Instrument，HybridEduCom）进行汉化，并进行信效度检验。方法遵循Brislin模型对英文版HybridEduCom进行翻译、文化调试和预调查，形成中文版量表。2024年3月—4月采用便利抽样法对553名护理相关领域的教育工作者进行调查，以检验量表的信效度。结果中文版HybridEduCom包括5个维度，分别为规划与资源配置能力（10个条目）、技术能力（8个条目）、互动能力（10个条目）、数字教学能力（12个条目）和伦理能力（6个条目）。验证性因子分析得到二阶五因子模型，模型卡方及自由度比值为1.274，近似均方根误差为0.022，拟合优度指数为0.913，标准拟合指数为0.934，Tucker-Lewis指数和比较拟合指数均为0.985，主要评价指标均在判断标准可接受范围内。量表水平内容的效度指数为0.968，条目水平的内容效度指数为0.833~1.000。量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.982，各维度的Cronbach’s α系数为0.892~0.936，重测信度为0.978。结论中文版HybridEduCom具有良好的信度和效度，可作为国内高等护理教育工作者混合式教学能力的评估量表。

关键词: 教育, 护理, 混合式教学能力, 信度, 效度, 量表

REN Ji, WANG Kefang, ZHANG Yuqi, JIN Yaru, ZHANG Lin, WANG Yanan, ZHANG Binbin, TANG Chunyan. Sinicization and test of reliability and validity of Chinese version of Hybrid Education Competence Instrument[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2025, 60(2): 228-235.

任吉, 王克芳, 张玉琪, 金雅茹, 张琳, 王亚男, 张彬彬, 唐春艳. 混合式教学能力评估量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(2): 228-235.

Figures/Tables 2

References 27

[1]	教育部. 教育部关于一流本科课程建设的实施意见[EB/OL].(2019-10-30)[2024-06-02]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201910/t20191031_406269.html.
	The Ministry of Education. The implementation opinions of the Ministry of Education on the construction of first-class under-graduate courses[EB/OL].(2019-10-30)[2024-06-02]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A08/s7056/201910/t20191031_406269.html.
[2]	教育部. 教师数字素养[EB/OL].(2022-11-30)[2024-06-02]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202302/t20230214_1044634.html.
	The Ministry of Education. Digital literacy in teachers[EB/OL].(2022-11-30)[2024-06-02].http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/202302/t20230214_1044634.html.
[3]	杨萍萍, 孙玉梅. 混合式学习背景下高校护理专业教师的机遇与挑战[J]. 中华护理教育, 2020, 17(6):498-502.
	Yang PP, Sun YM. Opportunities and challenges of nursing teachers in colleges and universities under the background of blended learning[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2020, 17(6):498-502.
[4]	刘晓莉, 高丰光, 谢婷玉, 等. 培养医学生自主学习能力和创新能力的医学免疫学线上线下混合式教学模式改革[J]. 中国免疫学杂志, 2023, 39(11):2402-2405.
	Liu XL, Gao FG, Xie TY, et al. Online and offline blended teaching reform in Medical Immunology course for training autonomous learning and innovation ability of medical students[J]. Chin J Immunol, 2023, 39(11):2402-2405.
[5]	冯晓英, 吴怡君, 庞晓阳, 等. 混合式教学改革:教师准备好了吗——教师混合式教学改革发展框架及准备度研究[J]. 中国电化教育, 2021(1):110-117.
	Feng XY, Wu YJ, Pang XY, et al. Blended teaching reform:are teachers ready:research on the development framework and readiness of teachers’ blended teaching reform[J]. China Educ Technol, 2021(1):110-117.
[6]	Mikkonen K, Tuomikoski AM, Sjögren T, et al. Development and testing of an instrument(HeSoEduCo) for health and social care educators’ competence in professional education[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020, 84:104239.
[7]	Jokinen H, Pramila-Savukoski S, Kuivila HM, et al. Development and psychometric testing of Hybrid Education Competence Instrument for social and health care,and health sciences educators[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2024, 132:105999.
[8]	Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, et al. An adaptation of Brislin’s translation model for cross-cultural research[J]. Nurs Res, 2001, 50(5):300-304. DOI PMID
[9]	王克芳, 徐东娟, 王雅琦. 护理领域量表类论文问题分析及建议[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(3):287-291. DOI URL
	Wang KF, Xu DJ, Wang YQ. Analysis and recommendations for issues in scale-based research papers in the field of nursing[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2024, 59(3):287-291. DOI URL
[10]	李灿, 辛玲. 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2008, 25(5):541-544.
	Li C, Xin L. Research on the evaluation method of reliability and validity of questionnaire[J]. Chin J Health Stat, 2008, 25(5):541-544.
[11]	王文娜, 张振香, 周辰茜, 等. 患者参与文化评估量表(医护版)的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(12):1487-1493.
	Wang WN, Zhang ZX, Zhou CX, et al. Validation of Chinese version of Patient Participation Culture Tool for Healthcare Workers and its application in clinical nurses[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2023, 20(12):1487-1493.
[12]	Santesson AHE, Bäckström M, Holmberg R, et al. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale(EBPAS) in a large and representative Swedish sample:is the use of the total scale and subscale scores justified?[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2020, 20(1):254.
[13]	Kotowska J, Olszewska TK, Modrzyński R, et al. Problem Drin-king Scale(SPP) psychometrical characteristic[J]. Psychiatr Pol, 2022, 56(2):339-354. DOI PMID
[14]	Park MS, Kang KJ, Jang SJ, et al. Evaluating test-retest relia-bility in patient-reported outcome measures for older people:a systematic review[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2018, 79:58-69.
[15]	褚云怡, 江子芳, 贺泽翻, 等. 基于癌症患者体验的安宁疗护质量评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(13):1657-1665. DOI URL
	Chu YY, Jiang ZF, He ZF, et al. Palliative care quality assess-ment tools based on the cancer patient experience:a systema-tic review[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2024, 59(13):1657-1665.
[16]	Kaiser HF. A second generation little jiffy[J]. Psychometrika, 1970, 35(4):401-415.
[17]	Krause JS, Saunders LL, Bombardier C, et al. Confirmatory fa-ctor analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9:a study of the participants from the spinal cord injury model systems[J]. PM R, 2011, 3(6):533-540.
[18]	Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit[J]. Sociol Meth Res, 1992, 21(2):230-258.
[19]	Fan XT, Sivo SA. Sensitivity of fit indices to model miss-pecification and model types[J]. Multivar Behav Res, 2007, 42(3):509-529.
[20]	Stegmann R. Review of a beginner’s guide to structural equa-tion modeling[J]. Struct Equ Modeling, 2017, 24(3):475-477.
[21]	叶增杰, 刘美玲, 骆东妹, 等. 中文版父母用疾病不确定量表在肿瘤患儿父母中的重新修订及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2016, 51(4):494-498.
	Ye ZJ, Liu ML, Luo DM, et al. Psychometric properties of the Parents’ Perception Uncertainty in Illness Scale in Chinese parents with cancerous children[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2016, 51(4):494-498.
[22]	陈娟娟, 李惠萍, 管玉香. 二元调整量表在乳腺癌患者及其配偶中的结构验证[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2023, 40(6):910-913.
	Chen JJ, Li HP, Guan YX. Structural verification of binary adjustment scale in breast cancer patients and their spouses[J]. Chin J Health Stat, 2023, 40(6):910-913.
[23]	黄越, 吴亚婷, 郭红莲. 体医融合应对青少年近视的协同问卷编制及检验[J]. 中国健康教育, 2022, 38(2):181-186.
	Huang Y, Wu YT, Guo HL. Compilation and test of Colla-borative Questionnaire on the Integration of Sports and Medi-cine to Ceal with Adolescent Myopia[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2022, 38(2):181-186.
[24]	郭广生, 董庆华. 高校人才培养工作的数字化转型路径[J]. 中国高等教育, 2024(5):57-60.
	Guo GS, Dong QH. Digital transformation path of talent train-ing in colleges and universities[J]. China High Educ, 2024(5):57-60.
[25]	Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN check-list for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties:a clarification of its content[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2010, 10(1):22.
[26]	张万鸾, 周利华. 混合式教学在护理本科生思维与沟通课程中的应用[J]. 中华护理教育, 2022, 19(11):994-997.
	Zhang WL, Zhou LH. The application of the blended teaching in the thinking and communication course for nursing under-graduates[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2022, 19(11):994-997.
[27]	姜丽萍, 谢传兵, 贾清水, 等. 赋能、转型、变革—职业教育数字化实践与探索:2022年职业教育国家级教学成果奖“数字化”主题获奖成果分析[J]. 中国职业技术教育, 2023(26):65-74.
	Jiang LP, Xie CB, Jia QS, et al. Enabling,transformation,re-formation—digital practice and exploration of vocational edu-cation—2022 vocational education national teaching achie-vement award “digital” theme award achievement analysis[J]. CSTPCD, 2023(26):65-74.