Reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of the Urinary Incontinence Awareness and Attitude Scale

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.09.013

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Urinary Incontinence Awareness and Attitude Scale（URINAS） and test its reliability and validity. Methods The Chinese version of the URINAS was developed by Brislin’s translation model for translation，back translation，cultural adaptation，and pilot investigation. A convenience sampling method was used to select 384 urinary incontinence patients who visited a tertiary hospital in Nanchang，Jiangxi Province from June 2024 to October 2024 for investigation，in order to evaluate the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Chinese version of the URINAS consisted of 5 dimensions with 26 entries. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of this scale was 0.843；the folded half reliability was 0.917；the retest reliability was 0.852. The content validity of the scale at the level of the entries ranged from 0.846 to 1.000，and that at the level of the scale was 0.979. A total of 5 metrics were extracted by exploratory factor analysis，and the cumulative variance contribution rate of 74.286%. The results of the validation factor analysis showed a chi-square/degree of freedom of 2.268，a root mean square error of approximation of 0.064，a standardized fit index of 0.916，a Tucker-Lewis index of 0.923，a comparative fit index of 0.906，and a goodness-of-fit index of 0.922. Conclusion The URINAS has good reliability and validity，and can better reflect the level of patients’ cognition and attitude towards urinary incontinence，thus providing theoretical basis for the development of corresponding intervention programs for such patients.

Key words: Urinary Incontinence, Cognition, Attitude, Reliability, Validity, Nursing Care

摘要：

目的汉化尿失禁患者疾病认知与态度量表，并进行信效度检验。方法采用Brislin翻译模型对原版尿失禁患者疾病认知与态度量表进行翻译、回译、跨文化调适和预调查，形成中文版尿失禁患者疾病认知与态度量表。采用便利抽样法，于2024年6月—10月选取在江西省南昌市某三级甲等医院出院的384例尿失禁患者进行调查，以评价该量表的信效度。结果中文版尿失禁患者疾病认知与态度量表包括5个维度，共26个条目，该量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.843，折半信度为0.917，重测信度为0.852。条目水平的内容效度为0.846~1.000，量表水平的内容效度为0.979。探索性因子分析共提取5个公因子，累计方差贡献率为74.286%。验证性因子分析结果显示，卡方自由度比值为2.268，近似误差均方根为0.064，标准拟合指数为0.916，塔克·刘易斯指数为0.923，比较拟合指数为0.906，拟合优度指数为0.922。结论中文版尿失禁患者疾病认知与态度量表具有较好的信效度，可较好地反映患者对尿失禁的认知和态度水平，为制订针对性的干预方案提供参考。

关键词: 尿失禁, 认知, 态度, 信度, 效度, 护理

CHENG Zhiqiang, ZHANG Baozhen, TANG Liping, LI Jing, XIA Jiaoyun, WEI Xueyan, GONG Zhixian, ZHANG Meizhen, LI Lusi. Reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of the Urinary Incontinence Awareness and Attitude Scale[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2025, 60(9): 1107-1112.

程志强, 张宝珍, 汤利萍, 李静, 夏娇云, 魏雪岩, 龚智娴, 张美珍, 黎露思. 尿失禁患者疾病认知与态度量表的汉化及初步应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(9): 1107-1112.

Figures/Tables 2

References 20

[1]	Lukacz ES, Santiago-Lastra Y, Albo ME, et al. Urinary inconti-nence in women:a review[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(16):1592-1604. DOI PMID
[2]	Kwon CS, Lee JH. Prevalence,risk factors,quality of life,and health-care seeking behaviors of female urinary incontinence:results from the 4th Korean national health and nutrition exa-mination survey Ⅳ(2007-2009)[J]. Int Neurourol J, 2014, 18(1):31-36.
[3]	Wang XJ, Jin Y, Xu P, et al. Urinary incontinence in pregnant women and its impact on health-related quality of life[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2022, 20(1):13.
[4]	唐惠艳, 李小寒. 女性尿失禁患者心理社会现状及干预策略的研究进展[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2021, 38(9):60-63.
	Tang HY, Li XH. Research progress of psycho-social status and intervention strategies among female patients with urinary incontinence[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2021, 38(9):60-63.
[5]	唐惠艳, 夏侯文秀, 余林硕, 等. 女性尿失禁患者心理社会适应量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2023, 38(16):66-70.
	Tang HY, Xiahou WX, Yu LS, et al. Development and valida-tion of a Psychosocial Adaptation Scale for Female Patients with Urinary Incontinence[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2023, 38(16):66-70.
[6]	管晓萌, 孙涛, 杨华, 等. 社会影响量表中文版应用于尿失禁患者羞耻感的信效度测量[J]. 护理学杂志, 2011, 26(7):63-65.
	Guan XM, Sun T, Yang H, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version Social Impact Scale applied in study of stigma in urinary incontinent women[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2011, 26(7):63-65.
[7]	Avci ÌA, Yıldırım ÖÖ, Eren DÇ. Urinary Incontinence Awareness and Attitude Scale(URINAS):a reliability and validity study[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2022, 49(6):551-557.
[8]	Akan N, Sancar B. Frequency of urinary incontinence and atti-tudes towards urinary incontinence of women in Mersin,Tur-key[J]. Pak J Med Sci, 2024, 40(7):1448-1453.
[9]	王晓娇, 夏海鸥. 基于Brislin经典回译模型的新型翻译模型的构建及应用[J]. 护理学杂志, 2016, 31(7):61-63.
	Wang XJ, Xia HO. Construction and application of a new translation model based on Brislin’s classical back translation model[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2016, 31(7):61-63.
[10]	廖利民, 付光. 尿失禁诊断治疗学[M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社,2012:509.
	Liao LM, Fu G. Diagnosis and treatment for urinary inconti-nence[M]. Beijing: People’s Military Medical Press,2012:509.
[11]	李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2018:465.
	Li Z, Liu Y. Research methods in nursing[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House,2018:465.
[12]	黄晨杉, 林榕, 陈丽丽, 等. 围手术期患者口渴不适量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(7):892-896. DOI
	Huang CS, Lin R, Chen LL, et al. The reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of Perioperative Thirst Discomfort Scale[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(7):892-896. DOI
[13]	张学颖, 尹雪梅, 张晓翠, 等. 新生儿重症监护室父亲支持量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(8):1275-1280. DOI
	Zhang XY, Yin XM, Zhang XC, et al. The reliability and vali-dity of the translated Chinese version of the Fathers’ Support Scale:Neonatal Intensive Care Unit[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(8):1275-1280.
[14]	孙晶, 郑秀利, 杨支兰, 等. 痴呆患者居家老年照顾者生活质量评估量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(12):1901-1906. DOI
	Sun J, Zheng XL, Yang ZL, et al. Sinicization of the Dementia Quality of Life Scale for Older Family Carers of Patients and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(12):1901-1906. DOI
[15]	张莹, 杨睿哲, 彭晓霞, 等. 验证性因子分析原理、模型及其在量表结构效度评价中的应用[J]. 中华健康管理学杂志, 2022, 16(6):428-432.
	Zhang Y, Yang RZ, Peng XX, et al. The principle and model of confirmatory factor analysis and its application in the evaluation of scale structure validity[J]. Chin J Health Manag, 2022, 16(6):428-432.
[16]	秦敬敬, 肖日姣, 李雪婷, 等. 减重代谢术后患者自我管理量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(10):1275-1280. DOI
	Qin JJ, Xiao RJ, Li XT, et al. The translation and validation of Bariatric Surgery Self-management Questionnaire[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(10):1275-1280. DOI
[17]	李淑花, 商临萍, 袁丽荣, 等. 感染预防控制文化量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(6):713-718. DOI
	Li SH, Shang LP, Yuan LR, et al. The sinicization of the Leading a Culture of Quality for Infection Prevention Scale and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2024, 59(6):713-718. DOI
[18]	刘金凤, 江秋霞, 刘阿兰, 等. 炎症性肠病患者疾病负担程度量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(5):635-640. DOI
	Liu JF, Jiang QX, Liu AL, et al. Translation and test of validation and reliability of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Disk Scale[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(5):635-640. DOI
[19]	史广玲, 张燕红, 张戈, 等. ICU跌倒风险评估工具的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(6):763-768. DOI
	Shi GL, Zhang YH, Zhang G, et al. The reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of the Tyndall-Bailey Falls Risk Assessment Tool for ICU[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(6):763-768. DOI
[20]	赵斐然, 周天驰, 张俊颖, 等. 量表(问卷)信度、效度评价在我国医学领域的应用与展望[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2014, 29(7):2280-2283.
	Zhao FR, Zhou TC, Zhang JY, et al. Prospect and application of evaluation about reliability and validity assessment on scale or questionnaire applied in the medical domain[J]. China J Tradit Chin Med Pharm, 2014, 29(7):2280-2283.