Abstract:

Objective Based on the scoping review framework，we collected cancer-related cognitive impairment （CRCI） assessment tools from home and abroad to provide references for the standardized use of such assessment tools. Methods Chinese and English databases，such as Pubmed，Embase，Web of Science Core Collection database，CNIK，Wanfang database，and VIP database，were systematically searched from the establishment of the database to April 12，2024，to extract the basic information of evaluation tools，and the search results were standardized. Results 31 articles were included，of which 26 were about the development or validation of assessment tools，and 5 were about the localization and application of assessment tools，involving 19 subjective assessment tools and 8 objective assessment tools. Most of the subjective assessment tool reliability and validity tests were internal consistency reliability tests and concurrent validity tests；14 subjective assessment tools were multidimensional scales；6 objective assessment tools measured retest reliability；4 were unidimensional measures. Conclusion The assessment tools chosen for the current studies vary. It is recommended to choose the evaluation tools and judgment standards recommended by the International Cognitive and Cancer Working Group to carry out relevant research. In the future，the existing CRCI assessment tools should be further verified and improved，and a localized CRCI assessment tool should be continuously introduced or developed.

Key words: Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment, Assessment Tools, Scoping Review, Nursing Care

摘要：

目的 基于范围综述框架收集国内外癌症相关认知功能障碍评估工具，为此类评估工具的选择提供参考。方法 系统检索了PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库等中英文数据库，检索时限为建库至2024年4月12日，提取文献和评估工具的基本信息，将检索结果进行规范化报告。结果 共纳入31篇文献，其中26篇关于评估工具的开发或验证，5篇关于评估工具的本土化验证及应用，共涉及19个主观评估工具和8个客观评估工具。主观评估工具信效度检验多采用内部一致性信度检验和同时效度检验，14个主观评估工具为多维度量表，6个客观评估工具测量了重测信度，4个为单维度测量。结论 目前相关研究选择的评估工具各不相同，建议选择国际认知和癌症工作组推荐的评估工具和判定标准开展相关研究，未来应进一步对现有癌症相关认知障碍评估工具进行验证和完善，并继续引入或研制本土化的癌症相关认知障碍评估工具。

关键词: 癌症相关认知障碍, 评估工具, 范围综述, 护理