Abstract:

Objective To translate and adapt the Recommending Cardiac Rehabilitation Scale（ReCaRe） into Chinese,and to analyze its reliability and validity.Methods ReCaRe was translated into Chinese version based on Brislin’s translation model,and then cultural adjustment and pretest were carried out to determine the Chinese version of ReCaRe （C-ReCaRe）. From July to August 2021,324 healthcare workers in the department of cardiology or cardiac surgery in Hunan Province were selected to conduct an online survey to evaluate the reliability and validity of C-ReCaRe.Results The C-ReCaRe has 16 items with good content validity. The item-level content validity index was 0.833~1.000;scale-level content validity index/universal agreement was 0.875;scale-level content validity index/average was 0.979. Exploratory factor analysis extracted 3 common factors （Eigenvalue>1）,namely perceived benefit and barriers,perceived severity and susceptibility,perceived service accessibility,and the cumulative contribution rate was 67.858%. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the 16-item scale was 0.867 with 0.881~0.908 for each dimension. The split-half reliability was 0.759 with 0.837~0.864 for each dimension.Conclusion The C-ReCaRe showed good reliability and validity,and it can act as a reliable tool to evaluate the recommending cardiac rehabilitation for Chinese healthcare workers.

Key words: Cardiac Rehabilitation, Recommendation, Healthcare Worker, Reliability, Validity, Nursing Care

摘要：

目的 对心脏康复推荐量表（the Recommending Cardiac Rehabilitation Scale,ReCaRe）进行翻译及文化调试,并分析其信效度。方法 依据Brislin经典回译模型对ReCaRe进行正译、回译,经文化调试及预调查后形成中文版ReCaRe。2021年7月—8月选取324名湖南省心血管内外科医护人员进行线上调查,评价量表的信效度。结果 中文版ReCaRe共16个条目,条目水平的内容效度指数为0.833~1.000,全体一致量表水平的内容效度指数为0.875,平均量表水平的内容效度指数为0.979,探索性因子分析共提取3个公因子,即感知到益处和障碍、感知到严重性和易感性、感知到服务可用性,累计方差贡献率为67.858%。总量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.867,各维度的Cronbach’s α系数为0.881~0.908;总量表的分半信度为0.759,各维度的分半信度为0.837~0.864。结论 中文版ReCaRe具有良好的信效度,可为评价医护人员心脏康复推荐信念提供可靠工具。

关键词: 心脏康复, 推荐, 医务人员, 信度, 效度, 护理