中华护理杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (2): 198-204.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2026.02.007

• 专科护理实践与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

《成人有创机械通气气道内吸引技术操作》团体标准临床实践现状及影响因素分析

曾晗月1(), 彭寅森2, 陈腾霞3, 李韵4, 朱守淋1, 黄乐娇1, 王彩莲1, 毛世芳5,*()   

  1. 1.西南医科大学护理学院 四川省泸州市 646000
    2.四川大学华西医院手术室 成都市 610041
    3.西南医科大学附属医院门诊部 四川省泸州市 646000
    4.西南医科大学附属医院肝胆外科 四川省泸州市 646000
    5.西南医科大学附属医院护理部 四川省泸州市 646000
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-31 出版日期:2026-01-20 发布日期:2026-01-14
  • *通讯作者: 毛世芳,E-mail:1172058534@qq.com
  • 作者简介:曾晗月:女 硕士,护师,E-mail:1554635527@qq.com

Analysis of clinical practice status and influencing factors of the Group Standard “Endotracheal Suctioning in Adults Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation”

ZENG Hanyue1(), PENG Yinsen2, CHEN Tengxia3, LI Yun4, ZHU Shoulin1, HUANG Lejiao1, WANG Cailian1, MAO Shifang5,*()   

  1. 1. School of NursingSouthwest Medical University,LuzhouSichuan Province 646000, China
    2. Operating RoomWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengdu 610041, China
    3. Outpatient Departmentthe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,LuzhouSichuan Province 646000, China
    4. Department of Hepatobiliary Surgerythe Affiliated Hospital of South-west Medical University,LuzhouSichuan Province 646000, China
    5. Nursing Departmentthe Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University,LuzhouSichuan Province 646000, China
  • Received:2025-07-31 Online:2026-01-20 Published:2026-01-14
  • * Corresponding author: MAO Shifang,E-mail:1172058534@qq.com

摘要:

目的 调查急危重症护士对《成人有创机械通气气道内吸引技术操作》团体标准(简称《标准》)的认知和应用情况,评估《标准》的执行程度和效果,为制订针对性干预策略提供依据。方法 于2024年10—12月,采用便利抽样法,选取17个省市的急危重症护士作为调查对象。基于能力-机会-动机-行为理论自行设计问卷,开展横断面调查。采用二元Logistic回归分析急危重症护士执行《标准》的影响因素。结果 共回收问卷1 110份,有效问卷1 057份,急危重症护士《标准》实践总分为197(169,225)分。二元Logistic回归分析显示,年龄、职称、知晓《标准》、科室有气道内吸引操作标准流程、参与过《标准》培训、参与过《标准》解读以及实施《标准》情况是急危重症护士执行《标准》的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 急危重症护士对《标准》的实践水平有待提升,且面临多维度障碍。建议管理者基于已识别的影响因素,采取精准干预措施,以提升急危重症护士执行《标准》的依从性,优化气道内吸引护理质量,推动《标准》的临床应用。

关键词: 成人有创机械通气, 气道内吸引, 团体标准, 能力-机会-动机-行为模型, 护理管理研究

Abstract:

Objective To investigate critical care nurses’ cognition and application status regarding the group standard “Endotracheal Suctioning in Adults Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation”,and to assess its clinical implementation level and effectiveness,so as to provide a basis for developing targeted intervention strategies. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted among critical care nurses from 17 provinces and cities across China between October and December 2024,using convenience sampling. Data were collected using a self-developed questionnaire based on the Capability,Opportunity,Motivation and Behaviour(COM-B) model. Binary logistic regression was employed to analyze the factors influencing critical care nurses’ practice level. Results A total of 1 110 questionnaires were distributed,with 1 057 valid responses retained for analysis. The total practice score among Critical care nurses was 197(169,225) points. Binary logistic regression identified age,senior professional title,awareness of the “Standards”,having a standardized endotracheal suctioning procedure in the department,receiving training and interpretation on the “Standards”,and implementation situation as significant facilitators of clinical practice(P<0.05). Conclusion Critical care nurses’ clinical practice regarding the group standard "Endotracheal Suctioning in Adults Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation" needs improvement and encounters a range of obstacles. It is recommended that managers implement precise interventions based on the identified influencing factors to enhance standard compliance,optimize the quality of endotracheal suctioning care,and promote the effective clinical application of the group standard.

Key words: Invasive Mechanical Ventilation, Endotracheal Suction, Group Standard, Capability,Opportunity,Motivation,and Behavior Theory, Nursing Management