中华护理杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (6): 736-742.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.06.015

• 人力资源管理与职业发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

护士循证决策能力量表的汉化及信效度检验

魏永婷(), 田书梅, 杨娇, 余良欢, 倪福, 范雨晴, 肖瑶, 席祖洋(), 沙菊艳, 刘聪   

  1. 443003 宜昌市 三峡大学第一临床医学院/宜昌市中心人民医院手术室一区(魏永婷,田书梅),呼吸与危重症医学科二病区(杨娇),护理部(余良欢,席祖洋),血液净化中心(刘聪);三峡大学健康医学院(倪福,范雨晴);首都医科大学护理学院(肖瑶);北京大学第一医院密云医院普外科(沙菊艳)
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-23 出版日期:2025-03-20 发布日期:2025-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 席祖洋,E-mail:297242464@qq.com
  • 作者简介:魏永婷:男,硕士,主管护师,E-mail:weiyongting@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    国家卫生健康委医院管理研究所医疗质量(循证)管理研究项目(YLZLXZ23G037);肿瘤微环境与免疫治疗湖北省重点实验室(三峡大学)护理科研开放基金课题(2022KZL1-01);宜昌市医疗卫生研究项目(A24-2-020)

Sinicization of Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for nurses and its reliability and validity test

WEI Yongting(), TIAN Shumei, YANG Jiao, YU Lianghuan, NI Fu, FAN Yuqing, XIAO Yao, XI Zuyang(), SHA Juyan, LIU Cong   

  • Received:2024-04-23 Online:2025-03-20 Published:2025-03-20

摘要:

目的 汉化护士循证决策能力量表并检验其在国内护士群体中的信效度。方法 成立研究小组,使用Brislin翻译模型对原量表进行直译、回译、跨文化调适、预调查及认知性访谈,最终形成中文版护士循证决策能力量表。采用便利抽样法,于2024年4月,选取北京市、湖北省、湖南省、新疆维吾尔自治区7所三级甲等医院的1 247名护士进行调查,检验量表的信效度。结果 回收有效问卷1 026份,有效问卷回收率为82.28%。中文版护士循证决策能力量表包括知识技能、信念、行为3个维度,共25个条目。探索性因子分析共提取3个公因子,累计方差贡献率为91.725%,量表条目水平的内容效度指数为0.830~1.000,量表水平的内容效度指数为0.988,效标关联效度为0.496,量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.992,分半信度为0.930,重测信度为0.927。结论 中文版护士循证决策能力量表具有较好的信效度和实用性,可用于评估国内护士的循证决策能力,为推动循证护理实践及循证决策提供依据。

关键词: 循证决策, 循证护理学, 量表, 信度, 效度, 护理管理研究

Abstract:

Objective To translate Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for Chinese nurses and test its validity and reliability. Methods A research group was set up to use the Brislin translation model to translate the original scale into Chinese,and the back translation,cross-cultural adaptation,pre-experiment and cognitive interview were conducted to finally form the Chinese version of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for nurses. A total of 1 247 nurses from 7 tertiary A hospitals in Beijing,Hubei,Hunan and Xinjiang were selected by convenience sampling method in April 2024 to test its reliability and validity. Results 1 026 effective question-naires were collected,with an effective recovery rate of 82.28%. The Chinese version of the Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure included 25 items,including knowledge/skill,attitude and behavior. A total of 3 common factors were extracted from exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 91.725%. The content validity index at the item level was 0.83-1.00;the content validity index at the scale level was 0.988;the calibration association validity was 0.496. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the whole scale was 0.992;the half-point reliability was 0.930;the retest reliability was 0.927. Conclusion The Chinese version of Evidence-Informed Decision-Making Competence Measure for nurses has good reliability and validity,and it can be used to evaluate the evidence-informed decision-making competence of Chinese nurses,provide references for promoting evidence-based nursing practice and evidence-informed decision-making.

Key words: Evidence-Informed Decision-Making, Evidence-Based Nursing, Scale, Reliability, Validity, Nursing Administration Research