造口患者居家预防及管理造口旁疝知信行量表的编制及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.04.004

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的编制造口患者居家预防及管理造口旁疝知信行量表并检验其信效度，旨在为评估造口患者居家预防及管理造口旁疝知信行水平提供可靠的评估工具。方法依据知信行理论，结合文献回顾、半结构式访谈、专家函询和预调查的结果，形成初始量表。于2023年5月—12月，采用目的抽样法，选取在天津市某三级甲等医院造口门诊就诊的685例造口患者作为调查对象，进行信度和效度检验。结果回收有效问卷673份，造口患者居家预防及管理造口旁疝知信行量表包含知识、态度、行为3个维度，共27个条目。2轮专家函询积极系数均为100%，权威系数均为0.915，肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.279、0.301。量表各条目的内容效度为0.875~1.000，平均内容效度为0.988；经2次探索性因子分析后显示，累计方差贡献率为65.920%。验证性因子分析结果显示，模型拟合度较好，其中卡方自由度比值为1.945，拟合优度指数为0.851，适配度指数为0.919，近似误差平方根为0.060。量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.957，重测信度为0.826，折半信度为0.934。结论该研究编制的造口患者居家预防及管理造口旁疝知信行量表具有良好的信度和效度，可作为评估造口患者居家预防及管理造口旁疝现状的评估工具。

关键词: 造口旁疝, 居家护理, 管理, 量表编制, 信度, 效度

Abstract:

Objective To develop a knowledge-attitude-practice assessment scale for home prevention and management of parastostomy hernia in ostomy patients，and to test its reliability and validity，to provide a reliable tool for evaluating the knowledge and practice level of home prevention and management of parastostomy hernia in patients with ostomy. Methods Based on the theory of knowledge，attitude and practice，the initial scale was generated through literature review，semi-structured interviews，expert correspondence，research group discussion and pre-survey. From May to December 2023，685 patients with ostomy from the ostomy clinic of a tertiary hospital in Tianjin were investigated by purpose sampling method，and the reliability and validity were tested. Results A total of 673 valid questionnaires were collected，the results showed that the knowledge-attitude-practice assessment scale for preventing and managing parastomal hernia of ostomy patients at home included 3 dimensions of knowledge，attitude and practice，with a total of 27 items. The response rates of 2 rounds of the questionnaire were both 100%；the authority coefficients were all 0.915；the Kendall’s coefficients of concordance were 0.279 and 0.301，respectively. The content validity index of each item was 0.875~1.000；the content validity index of the average scale level was 0.988；after 2 exploratory factor analysis，the cumulative variance contribution rate was 65.920%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model had a good fit，with a chi-square degree of freedom ratio（/df） of 1.945，the fitting goodness index（GFI） of 0.851，the comparative goodness of fit index（CFI） of 0.919，the root means square error of approximation（RMSEA） of 0.060. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient result of the scale is 0.957，with a test-retest reliability of 0.826 and a half reliability of 0.934. Conclusion The knowledge-attitude-practice assessment scale has good reliability and validity，and can be used as an assessment tool for home prevention and management of parastostomy hernia in ostomy patients.

Key words: Parastostomy Hernia, In-Home Nursing, Management, Scale Development, Reliability, Validity

张亚静, 朱卉, 尹宏, 龙裕, 李洋, 张巧梅, 马宏文. 造口患者居家预防及管理造口旁疝知信行量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(4): 411-417.

ZHANG Yajing, ZHU Hui, YIN Hong, LONG Yu, LI Yang, ZHANG Qiaomei, MA Hongwen. Development of a knowledge-attitude-practice assessment scale for home prevention and management of parastostomy hernia in ostomy patients and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2025, 60(4): 411-417.

图/表 2

参考文献 18

[1]	Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Alamino JMG, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1):183-198. DOI PMID
[2]	Vierimaa M, Klintrup K, Biancari F, et al. Prospective,randomized study on the use of a prosthetic mesh for prevention of parastomal hernia of permanent colostomy[J]. Dis Colon Rec-tum, 2015, 58(10):943-949.
[3]	Nverlo S, Gunnarsson U, Strigrd K, et al. Quality of life after end colostomy without mesh and with prophylactic synthetic mesh in sublay position:one-year results of the STOMAMESH trial[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2019, 34(9):1591-1599.
[4]	Shabbir J, Chaudhary BN, Dawson R. A systematic review on the use of prophylactic mesh during primary stoma formation to prevent parastomal hernia formation[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2012, 14(8):931-936. DOI PMID
[5]	朱礼霞, 姜武佳, 华剑红, 等. 造口旁疝与造口病人体力活动相关性研究进展[J]. 全科护理, 2021, 19(30):4221-4223.
	Zhu LX, Jiang WJ, Hua JH, et al. Study on the correlation between parastomal hernia and physical activity in stoma patients progress[J]. Chin Gen Pract Nurs, 2021, 19(30):4221-4223.
[6]	侯梦晓, 越丽霞, 汤玉梅, 等. 肠造口患者术后腹部运动体验的质性研究[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2022, 37(22):2107-2111.
	Hou MX, Yue LX, Tang YM, et al. Qualitative study of abdominal exercise experience in postoperative patients with colostomy[J]. J Nurses Train, 2022, 37(22):2107-2111.
[7]	Dang F, Zhai T, Ding N, et al. Development and validation of a Questionnaire to Measure ICU Nurses’ Knowledge,Attitudes,and Practices Related to Central Line Bloodstream Infection Practices[J]. J Nurs Care Qual, 2023, 38(4):E59-E65.
[8]	White M, Osborne W. The development of national guidelines for stoma care:parastomal hernia[J]. Br J Nurs, 2017, 26(17):S4.
[9]	Pu YW, Yang XD, Gong W, et al. Etiological analysis of parastomal herniaby computed tomography examination[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2019, 14(3):387-393.
[10]	ACPGBI Parastomal Hernia Group. Prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia:a position statement on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2018, 20(Suppl 2):5-19.
[11]	Maruo K, Tanaka T, Shindo T, et al. Incidence and risk factors of parastomal hernia after ileal conduit diversion in Japanese population[J]. Int J Clin Oncol, 2020, 25(10):1830-1834. DOI PMID
[12]	郑粉善, 曹沛莹, 华兴龙, 等. 乳腺癌患者需求量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(4):469-475. DOI URL
	Zheng FS, Cao PY, Hua XL, et al. Development of a Needs Scale for Breast Cancer Patients and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(4):469-475. DOI URL
[13]	吴明隆. 问卷统计分析实务:SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2018.
	Wu ML. Questionnaire statistical analysis practice[M]. Chong-qing: Chongqing University Press, 2018.
[14]	李琴, 刘婷, 张珊, 等. 痛风患者疾病感知评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(7):836-842. DOI URL
	Li Q, Liu T, Zhang S, et al. Development and psychometric validation of the Illness Perception Assessment Scale for Gout Patients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(7):836-842. DOI URL
[15]	颜艳, 王彤. 医学统计学[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社,2020:580-587.
	Yan Y, Wang T. Medical statistics[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House,2020:580-587.
[16]	盛楷迪, 于桂玲, 李智慧, 等. 1型糖尿病患儿照顾者照护能力量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(14):1730-1736. DOI URL
	Sheng KD, Yu GL, Li ZH, et al. Development and reliability and validity tests of Caring Ability Assessment Scale of Caregivers of Children with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(14):1730-1736. DOI URL
[17]	Kitamura S, Otaka Y, Murayama Y, et al. Reliability and validity of a New Toileting Assessment Form for Patients with Hemiparetic Stroke[J]. PM R, 2021, 13(3):289-296.
[18]	Temple B, Farley T, Popik K, et al. Prevalence of parastomal hernia and factors associated with its development[J]. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 2016, 43(5):489-493. DOI PMID

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	0	0	0	6

	来源	本网站

	次数	6
	比例	100%

摘要

351

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	351

	来源	本网站

	次数	351
	比例	100%