Peritoneal Dialysis Care Burden Questionnaire：translation and validation

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.21.011

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Peritoneal Dialysis Care Burden Questionnaire（PDCBQ） into Chinese version，and to test its reliability and validity. Methods The modified Brislin translation model was used to perform literal translation，back translation，expert translation，original author review，cultural adjustment and pre-investigation to form the Chinese version of PDCBQ. The convenience sampling method was used to select 274 caregivers of peritoneal dialysis patients who were revisited in the peritoneal dialysis center of a tertiary A general hospital in Tianjin from January to April 2024 as the investigation subjects to verify the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Chinese version of PDCBQ has a total of 30 items，which are divided into 3 dimensions，including patient dependence，subjective burden and objective burden. A total of 3 common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis，and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 77.366%. The structure validity χ²/df was 2.415；the norm fit index was 0.919；the relative fit index was 0.903；the incremental fit index（IFI） was 0.951；the Tucker-Lewis index was 0.941；the comparative fit index was 0.950；root mean square error of approximation was 0.072. The structural equation has a good fit. The total Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of the Chinese version PDCBQ was 0.984，and the item-level content validity index was 0.875~1.000. The total half-reliability and test-retest reliability of the scale were 0.975 and 0.984. Conclusion The Chinese version of PDCBQ has good reliability and validity and can be used to evaluate the burden of peritoneal dialysis caregivers in China.

Key words: Peritoneal Dialysis, Caregiver Burden, Reliability, Validity, Nursing Care

摘要：

目的对腹膜透析照顾者负担量表（Peritoneal Dialysis Care Burden Questionnaire，PDCBQ）进行汉化和信效度检验。方法采用改良版Brislin翻译模型对量表进行翻译、综合、回译、专家检译、原作者审核、文化调试和预调查，形成中文版PDCBQ。采用便利抽样法，选取2024年1月—4月在天津市某三级甲等综合医院腹膜透析中心复诊的274名腹膜透析患者的照顾者作为调查对象，验证量表的信效度。结果中文版PDCBQ包括患者依赖度、主观负担、客观负担3个维度，共30个条目。探索性因子分析提取3个公因子，累计方差贡献率为77.366%。验证性因子分析结果显示，卡方/自由度比值为2.415，规范拟合指数为0.919，相对适配指数为0.903，卡方准则结合增值拟合指数为0.951，非规范拟合指数为0.941，比较拟合指数为0.950，近似误差均方根为0.072，结构方程拟合度良好。该量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.984，量表条目水平的内容效度为0.875~1.000；总的折半信度和重测信度分别为0.975、0.984。结论中文版PDCBQ具有良好的信效度，可用于国内腹膜透析照顾者负担状况的调查。

关键词: 腹膜透析, 照顾者负担, 信度, 效度, 护理

JIA Xuejing, SHI Baoxin. Peritoneal Dialysis Care Burden Questionnaire：translation and validation[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2024, 59(21): 2633-2639.

贾雪敬, 史宝欣. 腹膜透析照顾者负担量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(21): 2633-2639.

Figures/Tables 1

References 29

[1]	Grad J, Sainsbury P. Problems of caring for the mentally ill at home[J]. Proc R Soc Med, 1966, 59(1):20-23. PMID
[2]	Bello AK, Okpechi IG, Levin A, et al. An update on the global disparities in kidney disease burden and care across world countries and regions[J]. Lancet Glob Health, 2024, 12(3):e382-e395. DOI PMID
[3]	国家卫生健康委员会统计信息中心. 2022中国卫生健康统计年鉴[R/OL].(2023-05-17)[2024-07-18]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/moh-wsbwstjxxzx/tjtjnj/202305/6ef68aac6bd14c1eb9375e01a0faa1fb.shtml.
	Statistical Information Centre of the National Health and Health Commission. 2022 China Health and Health Statistics Yearbook[R/OL].(2023-05-17)[2024-07-18]. http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/tjtjnj/202305/6ef68aac6bd14c1eb9375e01a0f-aa1fb.shtml.
[4]	Collaboration GCKD. Global,regional,and national burden of chronic kidney disease,1990-2017:a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017[J]. Lancet, 2020, 395 (10225):709-733.
[5]	王李胜, 童辉, 杨建国, 等. 人工智能在慢性肾脏病应用现状及展望[J]. 中国血液净化, 2022, 21(1):59-62.
	Wang LS, Tong H, Yang JG, et al. Application status and prospect of artificial intelligence in chronic kidney disease[J]. Chin J Blood Purif, 2022, 21(1):59-62.
[6]	倪兆慧, 金海姣. 中国腹膜透析发展70年[J]. 中国血液净化, 2019, 18(10):661-663.
	Ni ZH, Jin HJ. The developmental history of peritoneal dialysis in China in the 70 years[J]. Chin J Blood Purif, 2019, 18(10):661-663.
[7]	Li PK, Chow KM, van de Luijtgaarden MW, et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis[J]. Nat Rev Nephrol, 2017, 13(2):90-103.
[8]	《中国腹膜透析管理现状白皮书》项目组. 中国腹膜透析管理现状白皮书[J]. 中华肾脏病杂志, 2022, 38(12):1076-1104.
	Project Group of“White paper on the status of peritoneal dialysis management in China”. White paper on the current status of peritoneal dialysis management in China[J]. Chin J Nephrol, 2022, 38(12):1076-1104. DOI
[9]	苏春燕, 李欢, 肖顺贞, 等. 居家腹膜透析患者家庭照顾者负担及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2008, 43(6):566-568.
	Su CY, Li H, Xiao SZ, et al. Survey on burden and related factors of caregivers of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2008, 43(6):566-568.
[10]	易春燕, 陈晶晶, 昌瑶, 等. 腹膜透析患者照顾者的生存质量及相关影响因素分析[J]. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志, 2022, 23(11):972-976.
	Yi CY, Chen JJ, Chang Y, et al. Quality of life of caregivers and its influence factors in peritoneal dialysis patients[J]. Chin J Integr Tradit West Nephrol, 2022, 23(11):972-976.
[11]	胡慧敏, 王静, 徐欢欢, 等. 居家腹膜透析患者照顾者疾病家庭负担的调查分析[J]. 中国血液净化, 2020, 19(8):573-576.
	Hu HM, Wang J, Xu HH, et al. Investigation and analysis on the family burden of caregivers for home peritoneal dialysis patients[J]. Chin J Blood Purif, 2020, 19(8):573-576.
[12]	Teixidó-Planas J, Tarrats L, Arias N, et al. Overload Question-naire for caregivers of patients on peritoneal dialysis[J]. Nefro-logía(Engl Ed), 2006, 26(1):74-83.
[13]	Teixidó-Planas J, Tarrats Velasco L, Arias Suárez N, et al. Carer’s burden of peritoneal dialysis patients. Questionnaire and scale validation[J]. Nefrologia(Engl Ed), 2018, 38(5):535-544.
[14]	赵蓉蓉, 庄一渝. 护理领导者伦理决策信心量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(11):1376-1381. DOI URL
	Zhao RR, Zhuang YY. Sinicization of the Ethical Decision-Making Confidence Scale for nurse leaders and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2024, 59(11):1376-1381. DOI URL
[15]	Neupane SM, Bhattarai PC. Constructing the scale to measure entrepreneurial traits by using the modified Delphi method[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(7):e28410.
[16]	王文娜, 张振香, 周辰茜, 等. 患者参与文化评估量表(医护版)的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理教育, 2023, 20(12):1487-1493.
	Wang WN, Zhang ZX, Zhou CX, et al. Validation of Chinese version of Patient Participation Culture Tool for Healthcare Workers and its application in clinical nurses[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ, 2023, 20(12):1487-1493.
[17]	张萍, 高淳海, 瞿茜, 等. 临床护士批判性思维评估量表的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 护理学杂志, 2024, 39(1):64-67.
	Zhang P, Gao CH, Qu Q, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Critical Thinking Diagnostic of Frontline Nurses[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2024, 39(1):64-67.
[18]	陶娟, 陈慧颖, 蓝莹, 等. 手卫生行为量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(9):1147-1152. DOI URL
	Tao J, Chen HY, Lan Y, et al. The cross-cultural adaptation and reliability and validity evaluation of Hand Hygiene Behaviour Questionnaire[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(9):1147-1152. DOI URL
[19]	Wan DP, Cao SH, Li XR, et al. Translation,cross-cultural ada-ptation and validation of the Chinese version of the High Activity Arthroplasty Score[J]. Patient Relat Outcome Meas, 2024, 15:121-130.
[20]	方若瑄, 吴国翠, 魏艳, 等. 护士团队工作重塑量表的汉化与信度效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2024, 24(1):126-129.
	Fang RX, Wu GC, Wei Y, et al. The reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Team Job Crafting Scale for Nurses[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2024, 24(1):126-129.
[21]	王嘉钰, 刘蕾, 曹慧, 等. 自主功能指数量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(24):4413-4416.
	Wang JY, Liu L, Cao H, et al. Chinese version of Autonomic Function Index and its reliability and validity test[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2023, 37(24):4413-4416.
[22]	Tsai YS, Fang TP, Chi CC. A scale for Measuring Evidence-searching Capability:a development and validation study[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2019, 25(4):676-681.
[23]	李云霞, 雷先阳, 宁檬, 等. 心理痛苦耐受性量表的汉化及在青年HIV感染者/AIDS患者中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(7):891-897. DOI URL
	Li YX, Lei XY, Ning M, et al. Sinicization of the Tolerance for Mental Pain Scale and its reliability and validity in young adults living with HIV/AIDS[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(7):891-897. DOI URL
[24]	Schindler AK, Schimmel M, Oezsoy M, et al. Measuring teacher identity of physicians:a validation study of a questionnaire instrument[J]. Med Educ Online, 2024, 29(1):2333618.
[25]	Dondé C, Haesebaert F, Poulet E, et al. Validation of the French version of the Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale in a sample of hallucinating patients with schizophrenia[J]. Can J Psychia-try, 2020, 65(4):237-244.
[26]	谌璐, 俞雨生, 刘云, 等. 腹膜透析患者生活质量量表的编制与信效度检验[J]. 中国护理管理, 2016, 16(12):1649-1654.
	Chen L, Yu YS, Liu Y, et al. The development and the validity and reliability test of Quality of Life Scale among peritoneal dialysis[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2016, 16(12):1649-1654.
[27]	张钰琳, 朱向伟, 洪慧芳, 等. 重大传染病突发事件中护士伦理困境量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 护理学报, 2024, 31(4):1-6.
	Zhang YL, Zhu XW, Hong HF, et al. Development of Ethical Dilemma Scale for Nurses in major infectious disease emergencies and its reliability and validity[J]. J Nurs(China), 2024, 31(4):1-6.
[28]	孙卫领, 吴燕, 高键, 等. 工作-家庭行为角色冲突量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(14):1787-1793. DOI URL
	Sun WL, Wu Y, Gao J, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Work-Family Behavioral Role Conflict Scale[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(14):1787-1793. DOI URL
[29]	Evans M, Lewis RD, Morgan AR, et al. A narrative review of chronic kidney disease in clinical practice:current challenges and future perspectives[J]. Adv Ther, 2022, 39(1):33-43.