Abstract:

Objective This study explored the application effects of a self-designed atomizer fixing bracket in the atomization process of patients. Methods The self-designed atomizer fixing bracket includes 4 parts with a base,a connecting pipe,a universal hose and a fixing part of the atomizer cup. 63 patients in the emergency ward of a tertiary first-class hospital in Hefei from January to June 2020 were selected as the control group;63 patients from July to December 2020 were in the test group. Patients of the test group used a self-designed atomizer fixing bracket to assist atomization process,while patients of the control group used conventional standard atomization methods for atomization treatment. The comfort of atomization,the atomization time and the number of atomization interruptions were observed in 2 groups. Results The atomization time of the test group were（23.05±2.86） min,and the atomization time of the control group were（16.46±2.31） min with statistically significant differences between the 2 groups（P<0.001）. The numbers of atomization interruptions in the test group were（0.86±0.47） times,while the numbers of atomization interruptions in the control group were（1.77±0.57） times,and the difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant（P=0.013）. The comfort rate of atomization in the test group was 92.06%,and the control group was 76.19%. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant（P=0.031）. Conclusion The atomizer fixing bracket was convenient to use,which can help to improve the comfort of atomization of patients,reduce the number of interruptions of atomization,extend the time of atomization,and help improving the compliance of patients with atomization therapy.

Key words: Respiratory Disease, Metered Dose Inhalers, Equipment Design, Comfort, Nursing Care

摘要：

目的 自制雾化器固定支架,并探讨其临床应用效果。 方法 设计的雾化器固定支架包括底座、连接杆、万向软管和雾化杯固定部4个部分。便利选取2020年7月—12月合肥市某三级甲等医院急诊病房收治的63例患者作为试验组,选取2020年1月—6月收治的63例患者作为对照组。试验组采用自行设计的雾化器固定支架辅助进行雾化,对照组采用手持雾化器的方式进行雾化。比较两组雾化时间、雾化中断次数、雾化舒适率。 结果 试验组雾化时间为（23.05±2.86） min,对照组为（16.46±2.31） min,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义（P<0.001）;试验组雾化中断次数为（0.86±0.47）次,对照组为（1.77±0.57）次,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义（P=0.013）;试验组雾化舒适率为92.06%,对照组为76.19%,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义（P=0.031）。 结论 雾化器固定支架使用方便,可减少雾化中断次数,延长雾化时间,提高患者的雾化舒适度,有利于提升患者对雾化治疗的依从性。

关键词: 呼吸系统疾病, 定量雾化吸入器, 设备设计, 舒适度, 护理