Abstract:

Objective We conducted a scoping review to systematically review the literature reporting discharge planning,and identify the quality evaluation indicators and its collection time,along with related tools. Then the differences between the quality evaluation indicators for discharge planning at home and abroad were explored. Methods Focusing on the quality evaluation indicators for discharge planning,we systematically searched the relevant databases,guidelines and government websites. The information,including research topic,research type,the first author/institution,year of publication,country,evaluation indicator,participants,collection time and method,evaluation tool,were also extracted and summarized. Results The quality evaluation indicators for discharge planning were divided into 3 dimensions,namely patient-related indicators,medical institution-related indicators,and caregiver-related indicators. A total of 167 papers were included and 26 indicators were extracted. There were 12 patient-related indicators,and the top 5 were readmission rate,patient satisfaction,quality of life,self-care ability and mortality. There were 9 medical institution-related indicators,and the top 3 were length of stay in hospital,frequency of outpatient/emergency visits,and medical expenditure. There were 5 caregiver-related indicators,the most common of which is caregiver satisfaction. The readmission rate,quality of life,self-care ability,frequency of outpatient/emergency visits,and activities of daily living had statistically significant differences among the top 10 evaluation indicators for discharge planning at home and abroad. Conclusion The medical institutions should not only monitor patient outcome indicators,but also audit related indicators of medical institutions and caregivers. The researchers should also unify core evaluation indicators and corresponding measurement tools,select sensitivity indicators,develop indicators that can be extracted by using Electronic Information System in the future.

Key words: Discharge Planning, Implementation Quality, Evaluation Indicators, Scoping Review, Nursing Administration Research

摘要：

目的 对出院计划相关文献进行范围审查,以明确国内外出院计划实施质量评价指标、评价时机,及指标对应的评价工具,探索国内外出院计划实施质量评价指标的差异性。方法 聚焦出院计划评价指标,系统检索中英文数据库和相关指南、政府网站,提取汇总内容包括：研究主题、研究类型、作者/机构、年份、国家、评价指标、适用对象、评价时机、指标收集方法和指标对应的评价工具。检索时间为2020年2月24日,检索近10年文献。 结果 以利益相关者为分类依据,将出院计划实施质量评价指标分为患者相关、医疗机构相关、照护者相关3大类,共纳入167篇文献,共计26项指标。其中患者相关评价指标12项,出现频率最高的前5项为再入院率、满意度、生活质量、自我照护能力、病死率;医疗机构相关评价指标9项,出现频率最高的前3项为住院时长、门/急诊就诊次数、医疗服务费用;照护者相关评价指标5项,最常见的指标为照护者满意度。国内外出院计划实施质量排名前10的指标中再入院率、生活质量、自我照护能力、门/急诊就诊次数、日常生活活动能力5项指标在国内外文献中出现的频次差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论 建议医疗卫生机构在监测患者结局指标的基础上,兼顾医疗机构及照护者相关指标的监测,同时统一核心评价指标及对应测量工具,遴选敏感性评价指标,逐步开发可依靠信息系统自动提取的评价指标。

关键词: 出院计划, 实施质量, 评价指标, 范围综述, 护理管理研究