3种衰弱评估工具对急诊老年创伤患者不良结局的预测价值

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2026.09.007

中华护理杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 1200-1207.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2026.09.007

3种衰弱评估工具对急诊老年创伤患者不良结局的预测价值

陈晨¹(), 顾肖¹^,^*(), 郭凡¹, 王敏¹, 倪兴梅¹, 黄琴², 程念开²

¹ 南京医科大学附属苏州医院/苏州市立医院急危重症医学部苏州市 215000
² 南京医科大学附属苏州医院/苏州市立医院护理部苏州市 215000

收稿日期:2025-12-04 出版日期:2026-05-10 发布日期:2026-04-30
*通讯作者: 顾肖，E⁃mail：1021420954@qq.com
作者简介:陈晨：女，硕士，主管护师，E⁃mail：13771836249@163.com
第一联系人：作者贡献声明
陈晨：研究设计、数据收集、数据整理、统计学分析、论文撰写；顾肖：研究设计、数据收集、数据整理、统计学分析、论文撰写；郭凡、王敏：数据收集、研究指导、论文审阅与修改；倪兴梅：数据收集；黄琴、程念开：研究指导、论文审阅与修改
基金资助:
苏州市护理学会姑苏护理人才“青苗”计划(SHQM202501)

Predictive value of 3 frailty assessment tools for adverse outcomes in elderly trauma patients in an emergency department

CHEN Chen¹(), GU Xiao¹^,^*(), GUO Fan¹, WANG Min¹, NI Xingmei¹, HUANG Qin², CHENG Niankai²

¹ Department of Critical Care Medicine and Emergency， Suzhou Municipal Hospital， Suzhou 215000， China
² Nursing Department， Suzhou Municipal Hospital， Suzhou 215000， China

Received:2025-12-04 Online:2026-05-10 Published:2026-04-30
* Corresponding author: GU Xiao，E⁃mail：1021420954@qq.com
Funding program:
Suzhou Nursing Association Gusu Nursing Talent “Qing Miao” Program(SHQM202501)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的比较衰弱筛查量表（Fatigue，Resistance，Ambulation，Illness，Loss of weight，FRAIL）、临床衰弱量表（Clinical Frailty Scale，CFS）、创伤特异性衰弱指数（Trauma-Specific Frailty Index，TSFI）对急诊老年创伤患者发生不良结局的预测能力。方法采用前瞻性队列研究设计，选取2025年1—6月在苏州市某三级甲等医院259例急诊老年创伤患者为调查对象，分别使用FRAIL、CFS、TSFI评估衰弱程度，通过计算受试者操作特征曲线下面积（area under the curve，AUC），比较3种评估工具对急诊老年创伤患者发生不良结局的预测价值。结果共纳入248例，75例（30.2%）发生不良结局纳入事件组，173例（69.8%）未发生不良结局纳入非事件组，两组间衰弱评分差异具有统计学意义（P<0.001）。FRAIL的AUC为0.74，敏感度和特异度分别为0.64、0.78；CFS的AUC为0.70，敏感度和特异度分别为0.59、0.75；TSFI的AUC为0.83，敏感度和特异度分别为0.83、0.80。结论 TSFI相较FRAIL和CFS在预测急诊老年创伤患者不良结局方面效能较好，更适合国内急诊入院老年创伤患者的早期衰弱评估。

关键词: 创伤, 老年人, 衰弱, 量表, 预测, 急救护理

Abstract:

Objective To compare the predictive value of the Fatigue，Resistance，Ambulation，Illness and Loss of weight（FRAIL），Clinical Frailty Scale（CFS），and Trauma-Specific Frailty Index（TSFI） for adverse outcomes in elderly trauma patients in an emergency department. Methods This prospective cohort study enrolled 259 elderly trauma patients admitted to a tertiary hospital in Suzhou，China（January to June 2025）. Frailty was assessed using FRAIL，CFS，and TSFI. The predictive value of these tools for adverse outcomes in elderly emergency trauma patients was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve（AUC）. Results Among 248 included patients，75 patients（30.2%） who experienced adverse outcomes were included in an event group，and 173 patients（69.8%） who did not experience adverse outcomes were in a non-event group. Frailty scores differed significantly between groups（P<0.001）. ROC analysis revealed that TSFI（AUC=0.83，sensitivity=0.83，specificity=0.80） showed higher predictive accuracy than FRAIL（AUC=0.74，sensitivity=0.64，specificity=0.78） and CFS（AUC=0.70，sensitivity=0.59，specificity=0.75）. Conclusion TSFI demonstrated superior predictive efficacy for adverse outcomes in elderly trauma patients，making it more suitable for early frailty assessment in Chinese emergency departments.

Key words: Trauma, Aged, Frailty, Scale, Prediction, Emergency Nursing

陈晨, 顾肖, 郭凡, 王敏, 倪兴梅, 黄琴, 程念开. 3种衰弱评估工具对急诊老年创伤患者不良结局的预测价值[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1200-1207.

CHEN Chen, GU Xiao, GUO Fan, WANG Min, NI Xingmei, HUANG Qin, CHENG Niankai. Predictive value of 3 frailty assessment tools for adverse outcomes in elderly trauma patients in an emergency department[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2026, 61(9): 1200-1207.

图/表 5

表1 调查对象的基本信息及不良结局的单因素分析

Table 1 Basic information of the study subjects and single-factor analysis of adverse outcomes

表2 事件组和非事件组创伤、风险评估及血液指标的比较

Table 2 Comparison of trauma，risk assessment，and blood parameters between the event group and the non-event group

表3 随访3个月内急诊老年创伤患者再入院、再跌倒、死亡与FRAIL、CFS、TSFI评分的关系[例（百分比，%）]

Table 3 Comparison of FRAIL，CFS，TSFI scores and adverse outcomes within 3 months of follow-up[cases（percentages，%）]

表4 FRAIL、CFS、TSFI评分与急诊老年创伤患者不良结局的关系[例（百分比，%）]

Table 4 Relationship between patients’ FRAIL，CFS，and TSFI scores and adverse events[cases（percentages，%）]

图1 3种衰弱评分工具的受试者操作特征曲线注：TSFI为创伤特异性衰弱指数，FRAIL为衰弱筛查量表，CFS为临床衰弱量表。

Figure 1 ROC curves for 3 frailty scoring tools

参考文献 30

[1]	陈晨, 王明明, 王敏. 急诊老年创伤患者预检分诊的研究进展[J]. 中华急危重症护理杂志, 2024, 5(2):137-141.
	Chen C, Wang MM, Wang M. Research progress on triage of emergency elderly trauma patients[J]. Chin J Emerg Crit Care Nurs, 2024, 5(2):137-141.
[2]	杜伟, 周辉. 世界急诊外科学会2023版《老年及衰弱创伤患者管理指南》解读[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2025, 41(9):865-869.
	Du W, Zhou H. Interpretation of world emergency surgery society’s 2023 edition management guide for elderly and wea-kening trauma patients[J]. Chin J Neurosurg, 2025, 41(9):865-869.
[3]	孙菊, 孙慧慧, 庄金珊, 等. 肝移植患者衰弱变化轨迹及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(24):2993-2999. DOI
	Sun J, Sun HH, Zhuang JS, et al. Analysis of latent classes and influencing factors of frailty trajectories in liver transplant recipients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2025, 60(24):2993-2999. DOI
[4]	Alqarni AG, Gladman JRF, Obasi AA, et al. Does frailty status predict outcome in major trauma in older people?A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Age Ageing, 2023, 52(5):afad073. DOI URL
[5]	De Simone B, Chouillard E, Podda M, et al. The 2023 WSES guidelines on the management of trauma in elderly and frail patients[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2024, 19(1):18. DOI PMID
[6]	朱宏梅, 胡安妮, 韩江英, 等. 老年创伤患者衰弱的研究进展[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2023, 29(7):861-867.
	Zhu HM, Hu AN, Han JY, et al. Research progress of frailty in elderly patients with trauma[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2023, 29(7):861-867.
[7]	Alizai Q, Colosimo C, Hosseinpour H, et al. It is not all black and white:the effect of increasing severity of frailty on outcomes of geriatric trauma patients[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2024, 96(3):434-442. DOI URL
[8]	贾云洋, 梁小芹, 霍妍, 等. 老年髋部骨折围手术期衰弱护理管理专家共识(2024)[J]. 骨科临床与研究杂志, 2025, 10(2):65-71.
	Jia YY, Liang XQ, Huo Y, et al. Expert consensus on periope-rative frailty management of geriatric hip fracture patients(2024)[J]. J Clin Orthop Res, 2025, 10(2):65-71.
[9]	杨静, 高静, 陈昕羽, 等. 衰弱与急诊老年创伤患者不良预后关系的前瞻性队列研究[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2023, 54(4):816-823.
	Yang J, Gao J, Chen XY, et al. Relationship between frailty and poor prognosis in older trauma patients in the emergency department:a prospective cohort study[J]. J Sichuan Univ(Med Sci), 2023, 54(4):816-823.
[10]	卫尹, 曹艳佩, 杨晓莉, 等. 老年住院患者衰弱风险筛查工具的汉化及信效度研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2018, 34(20):1526-1530.
	Wei Y, Cao YP, Yang XL, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Fatigue,Resistance,Ambulation,Illness,and Loss for elder inpatients[J]. Chin J Prac Nurs, 2018, 34(20):1526-1530.
[11]	中华医学会老年医学分会,《中华老年医学杂志》编辑委员会. 老年人衰弱预防中国专家共识(2022)[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2022, 41(5):503-511.
	Chinese Geriatrics Society,Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Geriatrics. Chinese expert consensus on prevention of frai-lty in the elderly(2022)[J]. Chin J Geriatr, 2022, 41(5):503-511.
[12]	Chou YC, Tsou HH, Chan DD, et al. Validation of Clinical Frailty Scale in Chinese translation[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2022, 22(1):604. DOI
[13]	Jarman H, Crouch R, Baxter M, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of ED frailty identification in older trauma patients:a pros-pective multi-centre study[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2021, 29(1):54. DOI
[14]	Joseph B, Pandit V, Zangbar B, et al. Validating trauma-specific frailty index for geriatric trauma patients:a prospective analysis[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 219(1):10-17. DOI URL
[15]	Bai DX, Liang Y, Wu CX, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Trauma-Specific Frailty Index(TSFI) for geriatric trauma patients[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2023, 23(1):617. DOI
[16]	Xi SH, Wu ZB, Cui J, et al. Association between frailty,as measured by the FRAIL scale,and 1-year mortality in older patients undergoing hip fracture surgery[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2025, 25(1):65. DOI
[17]	Rickard F, Ibitoye S, Deakin H, et al. The Clinical Frailty Scale predicts adverse outcome in older people admitted to a UK major trauma centre[J]. Age Ageing, 2021, 50(3):891-897. DOI PMID
[18]	Joseph B, Saljuqi AT, Amos JD, et al. Prospective validation and application of the Trauma-Specific Frailty Index:results of an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multi-institutional observational trial[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2023, 94(1):36-44. DOI URL
[19]	Arslan Erduhan M, Doğan H, Ilhan B. Relationships of the Frai-lty Index and Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score with mortality in geriatric trauma patients[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2023, 29(4):486-492. DOI PMID
[20]	Chen Y, Dai FF, Huang SL, et al. Global,regional,and national burden of falls among older adults:findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021 and Projections to 2040[J]. NPJ Aging, 2025, 11(1):85. DOI
[21]	Nguyen A, Lee P, Rodriguez EK, et al. Addressing the growing burden of musculoskeletal diseases in the ageing US popu-lation:challenges and innovations[J]. Lancet Healthy Longev, 2025, 6(5):100707. DOI URL
[22]	Kim DH, Rockwood K. Frailty in older adults[J]. N Engl J Med, 2024, 391(6):538-548. DOI URL
[23]	张懿姝, 邱嘉婷, 尚群竺, 等. 痴呆患者跌倒风险及预测模型研究进展[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2025, 51(5):298-302.
	Zhang YS, Qiu JT, Shang QZ, et al. Research progress on risk factors and predictive models for falls associated with dementia[J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis, 2025, 51(5):298-302.
[24]	Folven KI, Biringer E, Nilsen RM, et al. Increased risk of rehospitalisation and death in older hospital patients at risk of malnutrition:a cohort study[J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2025, 29(2):100455. DOI URL
[25]	Sun X, Xu WC. Fast implementation of DeLong’s algorithm for comparing the areas under correlated receiver operating characteristic curves[J]. IEEE Signal Process Lett, 2014, 21(11):1389-1393. DOI URL
[26]	Hamdioğlu E, Altuntaş M, Çelik A, et al. Predicting mortality and intensive care needs in geriatric trauma patients:a ROC analysis of frailty and trauma scoring systems[J]. Eur J Trau-ma Emerg Surg, 2025, 51(1):262.
[27]	Hamidi M, Haddadin Z, Zeeshan M, et al. Prospective evalua-tion and comparison of the predictive ability of different frailty scores to predict outcomes in geriatric trauma patients[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2019, 87(5):1172-1180. DOI URL
[28]	吴珍珍, 张瑞, 常艳, 等. 衰弱表型和衰弱筛查量表在老年住院患者中的应用比较[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5):673-679. DOI
	Wu ZZ, Zhang R, Chang Y, et al. Application comparison of Frailty Phenotype and FRAIL Scale in frailty risk screening of elderly inpatients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(5):673-679. DOI
[29]	吴燕, 陈管洁, 吴燕平, 等. 中文版老年人多维衰弱评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(24):3045-3051. DOI
	Wu Y, Chen GJ, Wu YP, et al. Chinese version of the assess-ment tools for multi-dimensional frailty:a systematic review[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2025, 60(24):3045-3051.
[30]	冯静宜, 张雪芳, 周雪迎, 等. 老年衰弱患者真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(23):2928-2935. DOI
	Feng JY, Zhang XF, Zhou XY, et al. The real experience of frailty in elderly patients:a qualitative Meta-synthesis[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(23):2928-2935.

3种衰弱评估工具对急诊老年创伤患者不良结局的预测价值

Predictive value of 3 frailty assessment tools for adverse outcomes in elderly trauma patients in an emergency department

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李佳, 张玉玲, 邢乐, 张利峰, 牛秀峰, 许莉. 早产儿经上肢置入PICC尖端继发性异位风险预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1180-1186.
[2]	叶俊霜, 沈丽佳, 孟霞靓, 张玉姣, 蔡根莲, 邵碧云, 周亚辉, 张柳倩, 应金萍. 维持性血液透析患者对口腔衰弱认知和体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1215-1220.
[3]	杨明霞, 安冉, 臧金凤, 李春梅. 老年慢性病共病患者及照护者老老照护能力与自我忽视的相关性分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1230-1236.
[4]	韩媛媛, 石玉竹, 尚文涵, 么莉. 870所三级甲等医院老年住院患者跌倒伤害发生现状与影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1245-1252.
[5]	周益飞, 王海苹, 胡益环, 应莉, 罗松娜. 1例氢氟酸中毒并发呼吸心搏骤停患者的急救护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1257-1260.
[6]	李艳桃, 杨连招, 龙秀红, 陈玲, 高慧, 覃文婷, 朱芳慧, 罗雪儿. HIV感染者/AIDS患者创伤后成长体验的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1261-1268.
[7]	李田田, 渠楠, 崔丽萍, 蔚玲, 张莉峰, 程伊薇, 孙双. 血液透析患者自体动静脉内瘘血栓形成风险预测模型的Meta分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1269-1276.
[8]	李琰, 许翠萍. 聊天机器人在降低老年人社会疏离感中的应用进展及护理启示[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1291-1296.
[9]	李英, 闵玉娣, 罗葳, 高轩, 赵晟楠. 老年牙列缺损患者结构化健康教育方案的构建及应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(8): 1043-1050.
[10]	张莹, 杜若飞, 杨惠敏, 杜亚婷. 非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗期衰弱轨迹的潜在类别及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(8): 1051-1058.
[11]	李珊, 邵梦琪, 邱晨, 苏清清, 高远. 4 907例老年髋部骨折患者术后并发症发生现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(8): 1059-1065.
[12]	王晶, 石欢, 李云梦. ICU肠内营养支持患者误吸发生风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(7): 877-883.
[13]	王阳阳, 杨旻斐, 黄科儿, 姚晓月, 赵燕祥, 李佳麒, 尹娜, 黄凌, 张菊. 老年创伤性脑损伤合并衰弱患者早期运动康复照护促进与阻碍因素的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(7): 939-946.
[14]	王秀丽, 代春豪, 许梓婷, 李昊远, 冷敏敏, 张海博, 李晴, 杨丽娟. 运动干预在老年肌少性肥胖患者中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(7): 995-1001.
[15]	张莹, 杜若飞, 杨惠敏, 徐晓霞, 李黎明, 杜亚婷. 初诊血液肿瘤老年患者的衰弱现状及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(6): 749-756.