中华护理杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (13): 1733-1738.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2026.13.001

• 护理信息化专题 •    下一篇

基于生成式人工智能的护理证据智慧问答模型的开发与可用性评价

阮君怡1(), 戴尚哲2, 保智杰2, 魏忠钰2, 邢唯杰1,*()   

  1. 1 复旦大学护理学院 上海市 200032
    2 复旦大学大数据学院 上海市 200433
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-01 出版日期:2026-07-10 发布日期:2026-07-01
  • *通讯作者: 邢唯杰,E-mail:xingweijie@fudan.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:阮君怡:女,本科(硕士在读),E-mail:23211170004@m.fudan.edu.cn
    第一联系人:

    阮君怡:研究方案设计及实施、数据收集、统计分析、论文撰写;戴尚哲、保智杰:研究方案设计及实施;魏忠钰:研究指导、论文修改;邢唯杰:研究指导、论文修改、经费支持

  • 基金资助:
    上海高水平地方高校建设项目(FNDGJ202418)

Development and usability evaluation of a generative artificial intelligence-based nursing evidence question-answering model

RUAN Junyi1(), DAI Shangzhe2, BAO Zhijie2, WEI Zhongyu2, XING Weijie1,*()   

  1. 1 School of NursingFudan UniversityShanghai 200032, China
    2 School of Data ScienceFudan UniversityShanghai 200433, China
  • Received:2025-12-01 Online:2026-07-10 Published:2026-07-01
  • * Corresponding author: XING Weijie,E-mail:xingweijie@fudan.edu.cn
  • Funding program:
    The Construction Project of High-Level Local Universities in Shanghai(FNDGJ202418)

摘要:

目的 构建护理证据数据集,训练并开发基于生成式人工智能的护理证据智慧问答模型,并评价模型的可用性,以期为临床护士提供即时决策支持。方法 全面检索国内外护理领域的文献资料,根据“5S”证据金字塔模型进行分类,构建包含6 000余份证据总结、1.5万余份指南及专家共识、50余万份系统评价等资料的训练数据集。选取国内开源性能较好的大语言模型作为基座模型,依托训练数据集构建了80余万条大语言模型指令微调样本对和70余万条内容的护理证据向量知识库,采用监督微调和检索增强生成技术,训练并开发护理证据智慧问答模型。2025年9月,便利选取23名临床护士试用该模型。采用自行编制的模型可用性评价问卷评价模型的可用性,得分越低表明可用性越好。结果 23名护士均完成了模型的试用,模型可用性评价问卷中模型质量维度得分为(1.99±0.85)分、信息质量维度为(2.59±1.03)分、界面质量维度为(2.28±1.25)分、用户满意维度为(2.76±1.00)分、使用意愿维度为(2.19±1.32)分、净收益维度为(2.03±0.78)分。结论 该护理证据智慧问答模型的整体可用性良好,使用该模型可帮助临床护士更高效地获取循证护理证据。未来可进一步拓展该模型的功能、丰富输出信息。

关键词: 循证护理, 生成式人工智能, 问答模型, 可用性评价

Abstract:

Objective To construct a nursing evidence dataset,develop a generative artificial intelligence-based nursing evidence question-answering model,and evaluate its usability,with the aim of providing real-time decision support for clinical nurses. Methods Domestic and international nursing literature was comprehensively retrieved and classified according to the “5S” evidence pyramid. A training dataset was constructed,comprising more than 6,000 evidence summaries,over 15,000 guidelines and expert consensuses,and more than 500,000 systematic reviews. A domestically developed open-source large language model with strong performance was selected as the base model. Based on the training dataset,over 800,000 instruction fine-tuning sample pairs and more than 700,000 nursing evidence were generated. Supervised fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation were employed to train and develop a nursing evidence question-answering model. In September 2025,23 clinical nurses were recruited via convenience sampling to test the model. The usability of the model was evaluated using a self-developed model usability evaluation questionnaire. A lower score indicates better usability. Results All 23 nurses completed the model trial. In the model usability evaluation questionnaire,the scores were as follows:model quality dimension(1.99±0.85) points,information quality dimension(2.59±1.03) points,interface quality dimension(2.28±1.25) points,user satisfaction dimension(2.76±1.00) points,intention to use dimension(2.19±1.32) points,and net benefits dimension(2.03±0.78) points. Conclusion The overall usability of the nursing evidence question-answering model was good,and its use may help clinical nurses obtain evidence-based nursing information more efficiently. Future work could further expand the model’s functions and enrich the output information.

Key words: Evidence-Based Nursing, Generative Artificial Intelligence, Question-Answering Model, Usability Test