基于信息框架效应的垂体瘤患者自我管理行为干预方案的应用研究

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2026.04.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的探讨基于积极与消极信息框架的自我管理行为干预方案对垂体瘤术后患者的应用效果，以期对提升专科护理质量提供参考。方法于2025年1—4月，采用便利抽样法，选取郑州市某三级甲等医院神经外科行经鼻蝶垂体瘤切除术的患者作为研究对象，按随机数字表法将其分为3组，每组各28例。试验组采用基于信息框架效应的自我管理行为干预（积极组按照积极信息框架进行干预，消极组按照消极信息框架进行干预），对照组接受常规术后健康教育。比较干预前后3组慢性病自我管理水平、患者积极度及患者生活质量的差异。结果共80例患者完成研究（积极组27例，消极组27例，对照组26例）。干预后，消极组慢性病自我管理水平优于积极组和对照组（均P<0.001）；消极组积极度优于积极组和对照组（均P<0.05）；试验组生活质量“未来不确定性”维度水平优于对照组（H=9.676，P=0.008），消极组生活质量“视觉障碍”维度水平优于积极组和对照组（均P<0.05）。结论基于消极信息框架的自我管理行为干预更有利于提升垂体瘤术后患者的自我管理水平、积极度，改善视觉障碍，可为优化垂体瘤术后康复管理提供有效的干预策略。

关键词: 垂体瘤术后, 信息框架效应, 自我管理, 生活质量, 护理

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of a self-management behavior intervention program based on positive or negative information framing in patients after pituitary adenoma surgery，aiming to improve specialized nursing care quality. Methods From January to April 2025，using convenience sampling，patients who underwent transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma resection in the neurosurgery department of a tertiary hospital in Zhengzhou were selected as study participants. They were randomly divided into 3 groups using a random number table，with 28 patients in each group. The experimental groups received a self-management behavior intervention based on information framing effects（the positive group received interventions based on positive information frames, while the negative group received interventions based on negative information frames），while the control group received routine postoperative health education. Differences in chronic disease self-management levels，patient activation，and quality of life among the 3 groups were compared before and after the intervention. Results A total of 80 patients completed the study （27 in the positive framing group，27 in the negative framing group，and 26 in the control group）. The negative framing group showed significantly better self-management levels than both the positive framing group and the control group （both P<0.001）. Patient activation was also higher in the negative framing group compared to the other 2 groups （both P<0.05）. Regarding quality of life，the experimental groups scored better in “future uncertainty” than the control group （H=9.676，P=0.008），and the negative framing group had better outcomes for“visual disorder”（both P<0.05）. Conclusion A negative information framing approach is more effective in enhancing self-management，patient activation，and visual outcomes post-surgery，offering a valuable strategy for optimizing rehabilitation.

Key words: Postoperative Pituitary Adenoma, Information Framing Effect, Self-Management, Quality of Life, Nursing Care

潘圆圆, 王董慧, 傅慧琳. 基于信息框架效应的垂体瘤患者自我管理行为干预方案的应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(4): 475-482.

PAN Yuanyuan, WANG Donghui, FU Huilin. Applied research on an intervention program based on the information framing effect for self-management behaviors in pituitary adenoma patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2026, 61(4): 475-482.

图/表 5

表1 基于信息框架效应的垂体瘤术后患者自我管理行为干预方案

Table 1 The information intervention program for self-management behaviors in postoperative pituitary adenoma patients using the framing effect

表2 3组一般资料的比较

Table 2 Comparison of general information of 3 groups

表3 3组干预前后自我管理水平的比较（分，$\bar{x}\pm s$）

Table 3 Comparison of scores of self-management before and after intervention in 3 groups（scores，$\bar{x}\pm s$）

表4 3组干预前后患者积极度的比较（分，$\bar{x}\pm s$）

Table 4 Comparison of scores of patient activation before and after intervention in 3 groups（scores，$\bar{x}\pm s$）

表5 3组干预前后患者生活质量的比较[分, M（P25，P75）]

Table 5 Comparison of scores of patients quality of life before and after intervention in 3 groups [scores，M（P25，P75）]

参考文献 22

[1]	Price M, Ballard C, Benedetti J, et al. CBTRUS statistical report:primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2017-2021[J]. Neuro Oncol, 2024, 26(Suppl 6):vi1-vi85.
[2]	中国垂体腺瘤协作组. 中国垂体腺瘤外科治疗专家共识[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2015, 95(5):324-329.
	China Pituitary Adenoma Cooperative Group. Chinese expert consensus on surgical management of pituitary adenomas[J]. Nat Med J Chin, 2015, 95(5):324-329.
[3]	Fleseriu M, Hashim IA, Karavitaki N, et al. Hormonal replacement in hypopituitarism in adults:an endocrine society clinical practice guideline[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2016, 101(11):3888-3921. DOI PMID
[4]	张妍欣, 杨丽, 李家燕, 等. 鼻咽癌患者同步放化疗后自我管理积极度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(15):1853-1859. DOI
	Zhang YX, Yang L, Li JY, et al. Analysis on the current situation and influencing factors of the self-management positivity of patients in the recovery period after simultaneous radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(15):1853-1859. DOI
[5]	王董慧, 傅慧琳, 潘圆圆. 垂体瘤术后患者自我管理行为障碍因素的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(14):1730-1735. DOI
	Wang DH, Fu HL, Pan YY. A qualitative study on barriers to self-management behaviors in postoperative pituitary adenoma patients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2025, 60(14):1730-1735. DOI
[6]	杨靖云, 谢冠玲, 姚顺. 垂体神经内分泌肿瘤患者并发认知障碍及情绪异常研究进展[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2025, 51(4):246-251.
	Yang JY, Xie GL, Yao S. Research progress on cognitive impairments and emotional disorders in patients with pituitary neuroendocrine tumors[J]. Chin J Nerv Ment Dis, 2025, 51(4):246-251.
[7]	Rothman AJ, Salovey P. Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior:the role of message framing[J]. Psychol Bull, 1997, 121(1):3-19. DOI PMID
[8]	Gao RT, Guo H, Li F, et al. The effects of health behaviours and beliefs based on message framing among patients with chronic diseases:a systematic review[J]. BMJ Open, 2022, 12(1):e055329.
[9]	Park J, Kim SH, Kim JG. Effects of message framing and health literacy on intention to perform diabetes self-care:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 2020,161:108043.
[10]	Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Ritter PL, et al. Effect of a self-management program on patients with chronic disease[J]. Eff Clin Pract, 2001, 4(6):256-262. PMID
[11]	傅东波, 沈贻谔, 丁永明, 等. 上海慢性病自我管理项目对自我效能的影响评价[J]. 中国健康教育, 2003, 19(10):740-742.
	Fu DB, Shen YE, Ding YM, et al. The impact of Shanghai chronic disease self-management program on self efficacy[J]. Chin J Health Educ, 2003, 19(10):740-742.
[12]	Hibbard JH, Mahoney ER, Stockard J, et al. Development and testing of a short form of the Patient Activation Measure[J]. Health Serv Res, 2005, 40(6p1):1918-1930. DOI URL
[13]	洪洋, 邹叶芳, 吴娟. 中文版患者积极度量表的信效度研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2018, 24(25):3009-3015.
	Hong Y, Zou YF, Wu J. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Patient Activation Measure[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2018, 24(25):3009-3015.
[14]	Leung A, Lien KR, Zeng L, et al. The EORTC QLQ-BN 20 for assessment of quality of life in patients receiving treatment or prophylaxis for brain metastases:a literature review[J]. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res, 2011, 11(6):693-700. DOI URL
[15]	龚钰, 田婧汝, 陈盼, 等. 脑瘤患者生活质量测定量表EORTCQLQ-C30、QLQ-BN20的中文版评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(6):490-494,500.
	Gong Y, Tian JR, Chen P, et al. Evaluation of the Chinese version of EORTCQLQ-C30,QLQ-BN20 for brain tumor patients[J]. J Nurses Train, 2020, 35(6):490-494,500.
[16]	European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). EORTC quality of life group:study coordinator manual 2023[EB/OL]. (2023-07)[2024-09-05]. https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2023/07/SCmanual2023.pdf.
[17]	谢玉生, 黄蓉蓉, 刘昭晴, 等. 基于收益与损失信息框架的健康教育在糖尿病高危足患者中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(11):1336-1343. DOI
	Xie YS, Huang RR, Liu ZQ, et al. Application of health education based on gain and loss message framework in patients with high-risk diabetic foot[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2025, 60(11):1336-1343. DOI
[18]	Minich M, Chang CT, Kriss LA, et al. Gain/loss framing moderates the VMPFC’s response to persuasive messages when behaviors have personal outcomes[J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2023, 18(1):nsad069.
[19]	Murayama H, Sasaki S, Takahashi Y, et al. Message framing effects on attitude and intention toward social participation in old age[J]. BMC Public Health, 2023, 23(1):1713. DOI PMID
[20]	常雅舒, 李可意, 倪志宏. 新疆南疆地区代谢综合征患者健康管理行为的潜在剖面分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(12):1475-1483. DOI
	Chang YS, Li KY, Ni ZH. Potential profile analysis of health management behaviors of patients with metabolic syndrome in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2024, 59(12):1475-1483. DOI
[21]	Malezieux M, Klein AS, Gogolla N. Neural circuits for emotion[J]. Annu Rev Neurosci, 2023,46:211-231.
[22]	Ort A, Reinhardt A, Koch L, et al. The emotional effects of gain-loss frames in persuasive messages about sun protection on health promotional outcomes:evidence from an experimental study[J]. Health Commun, 2023, 38(3):512-521. DOI URL