Objective To explore the effects of high intensity interval training(HIIT) and moderate continuous training(MCT) in patients with cardiac rehabilitation Phase Ⅱ. Methods PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,Wanfang database and China Biomedical Database were searched from inception to November 2018. Results Finally 9 articles were included,including 8 in English and 1 in Chinese,with a total of 473 patients. In the PhaseⅡ cardiac rehabilitation,HIIT compared with MCT significantly improved peak oxygen uptake [MD=2.13,95%CI(0.71,3.55),Z=2.94,P<0.01],improved the left ventricular ejection fraction[MD=3.38,95%CI(1.31,5.46),Z=3.19,P<0.01]. There were no differences in 6 min walking test[MD=30.10,95%CI(-1.31,61.52),Z=1.88,P=0.06],left ventricular end-diastolic volume[SMD=0.14,95%CI(-0.40, 0.69),Z=0.51,P=0.61],HDL[SMD=0.09,95%CI(-0.79, 0.97),Z=0.21,P=0.83],LDL[SMD=-0.20,95%CI(-0.78,0.38),Z=0.68,P=0.50] and quality of life[MD=0.37,95%CI(-8.25,8.99),Z=0.08,P=0.93] between HIIT and MCT. Compared with MCT,subgroup analysis showed that HIIT significantly improved peak oxygen uptake in patients with heart failure accompanied by decreased ejection fraction[MD=2.35,95%CI(0.11,4.58),Z=2.05,P=0.04] and left ventricular ejection fraction[MD=3.46,95%CI(0.96,5.96), Z=2.72,P<0.01]. Conclusion In Phase Ⅱ cardiac rehabilitation,HIIT compared with MCT,can effectively improve the peak oxygen uptake and left ventricular ejection fraction,but there are no differences in improving patients’ quality of life and lipid metabolism.