Systematic review of assessment tools for maladaptive eating behaviors in bariatric surgery patients

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.18.018

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To systematically evaluate the methodological quality and measurement properties of assessment tools for maladaptive eating behaviors in bariatric surgery patients. Methods A systematic search of the CNKI，Wanfang database，VIP，CBM，PubMed，Web of Science，Embase，and Cochrane Library was conducted from inception to March 15，2025. Totally 2 researchers independently screened the literature and extracted the data. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments checklist and quality criteria were employed to evaluate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of the included assessment tools，and combined with a modified version of the GRADE to form recommendations. Results A total of 14 articles were included，involving 2 specific assessment tools for bariatric surgery patients and 10 universal assessment tools. The methodological quality of content validity was rated as “unclear” for all scales，with moderate certainty of evidence. Structural validity and internal consistency generally performed well（Cronbach’s α>0.7）. However，evidence for stability，criterion validity，and cross-cultural validity remains insufficient. A total of 9 instruments were recommended as Grade B，while 3 were recommended as Grade C. Conclusion The disordered eating after bariatric surgery and the food craving questionnaire-trait are recommended for clinical use，but further validation of their psychometric properties is still needed.

Key words: Bariatric Surgery, Disordered Eating Behavior, Assessment Tool, Systematic Review, Evidence-Based Nursing

摘要：

目的系统评价减重手术患者不良饮食行为评估工具，为临床医护人员选择最佳的评估工具提供依据。方法系统检索中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献服务系统、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library数据库，检索时限为建库至2025年3月15日。由2名研究人员独立进行方法学和测量学质量评价，并结合改良版推荐分级的评估、制定与评价形成推荐意见。结果共纳入14篇文献，包括2个减重手术患者不良饮食行为特异性评估工具和10个普适性评估工具。所有评估工具的内容效度方法学质量均为“模糊”，证据等级为中等；结构效度与内部一致性普遍表现良好（Cronbach’s α系数>0.7）；稳定性、效标效度及跨文化效度研究不足。9个评估工具为B级推荐，3个为C级推荐。结论推荐使用减重术后饮食失调自我报告问卷以及食物渴望特征问卷，但其测量学属性仍需进一步验证。

关键词: 减重手术, 不良饮食行为, 评估工具, 系统评价, 循证护理学

TIAN Xueqing, JIA Guoan, XIANG Yuhua, LI Hong, JI Hong. Systematic review of assessment tools for maladaptive eating behaviors in bariatric surgery patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2025, 60(18): 2287-2293.

田雪晴, 贾国安, 相裕华, 李红, 季红. 减重手术患者不良饮食行为评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(18): 2287-2293.

Figures/Tables 4

References 33

[1]	World Heath Organization. Obesity and overweight[EB/OL].(2025-05-07)[2025-06-02]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/.
[2]	Salminen P, Grönroos S, Helmiö M, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss,comorbidities,and reflux at 10 years in adult patients with obesity:the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2022, 157(8):656-666. DOI PMID
[3]	花红霞, 梁辉, 徐欣怡, 等. 减重代谢术后不良饮食行为:概念分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(7):783-789.
	Hua HX, Liang H, Xu XY, et al. Maladaptive eating behavior after bariatric surgery:a conceptual analysis[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2023, 26(7):783-789.
[4]	Boniecka I, Czerwonogrodzka-Senczyna A, Jeznach-Steinhagen A, et al. Nutritional status,selected nutrients intake,and metabolic disorders in bariatric surgery patients[J]. Nutrients, 2023, 15(11):2479.
[5]	Guerdjikova AI, West-Smith L, McElroy SL, et al. Emotional eating and emotional eating alternatives in subjects undergoing baria-tric surgery[J]. Obes Surg, 2007, 17(8):1091-1096. DOI PMID
[6]	Walfish S. Self-assessed emotional factors contributing to inc-reased weight gain in pre-surgical bariatric patients[J]. Obes Surg, 2004, 14(10):1402-1405. PMID
[7]	Almaghrbi R, Alyamani R, Aliwi L, et al. Association between die-tary pattern,weight loss,and diabetes among adults with a history of bariatric surgery:results from the Qatar biobank study[J]. Nutrients, 2024, 16(14):2194.
[8]	李志文, 李文雅, 雷雪姣, 等. 减重代谢术后患者饮食体验的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(10):1567-1575. DOI
	Li ZW, Li WY, Lei XJ, et al. A qualitative systematic review of dietary experiences among patients after metabolic bariatric surgery[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(10):1567-1575. DOI
[9]	Mokkink LB, de Vet HW, Prinsen CC, et al. COSMIN risk of bias checklist for systematic reviews of patient-reported out-come measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(5):1171-1179. DOI PMID
[10]	Prinsen CC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures[J]. Qual Life Res, 2018, 27(5):1147-1157. DOI PMID
[11]	Alhazzani W, Guyatt G. An overview of the GRADE approach and a peek at the future[J]. Med J Aust, 2018, 209(7):291-292. PMID
[12]	刘宁, 李婧菱, 左顺利, 等. 烧伤患者身体意象特异性评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(4):478-486. DOI
	Liu N, Li JL, Zuo SL, et al. Systematic review of a body image assessment tool for burn patients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2025, 60(4):478-486. DOI
[13]	花红霞, 梁辉, 许勤, 等. 放牧饮食行为测评量表的汉化及其在减重代谢术后患者中的信效度检验[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(7):810-815.
	Hua HX, Liang H, Xu Q, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Repetitive Eating Questionnaire for patients undergoing bariatric surgery[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2023, 26(7):810-815.
[14]	Lewis KH, Ji M, Bai Y, et al. Bariatric surgical alterations in tolerability,enjoyment and cravings in the diet(BSATED) instrument:a new scale to measure food preferences following bariatric surgery[J]. Appetite, 2021,162:105151.
[15]	Brunault P, Berthoz S, Gearhardt AN, et al. The modified Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0:validation among non-clinical and clinical French-speaking samples and comparison with the full Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2020, 11:480671.
[16]	Clark SM, Martens K, Smith-Mason CE, et al. Validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 among a bariatric surgery population[J]. Obes Surg, 2019, 29(9):2923-2928. DOI PMID
[17]	Carr MM, Lawson JL, Ivezaj V, et al. Psychometric properties of the Eating Loss of Control Scale among postbariatric patients[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2019, 15(10):1829-1835. DOI PMID
[18]	Zickgraf HF, Rigby A. The Adult Eating Behaviour Question-naire in a bariatric surgery-seeking sample:factor structure,convergent validity,and associations with BMI[J]. Eur Eat Disord Rev, 2019, 27(1):97-104. DOI PMID
[19]	Conceiçäo EM, Mitchell JE, Machado PPP, et al. Repetitive Eat-ing Questionnaire[Rep(eat)-Q]:enlightening the concept of grazing and psychometric properties in a Portuguese sample[J]. Appetite, 2017,117:351-358.
[20]	Hood MM, Grupski AE, Hall BJ, et al. Factor structure and pre-dictive utility of the Binge Eating Scale in bariatric surgery candidates[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2013, 9(6):942-948.
[21]	Weineland S, Alfonsson S, Dahl J, et al. Development and vali-dation of a new questionnaire measuring eating disordered behaviours post bariatric surgery[J]. Clin Obes, 2012, 2(5/6):160-167.
[22]	Grilo CM, Henderson KE, Bell RL, et al. Eating Disorder Exa-mination-Questionnaire factor structure and construct validity in bariatric surgery candidates[J]. Obes Surg, 2013, 23(5):657-662.
[23]	Crowley NM, LePage ML, Goldman RL, et al. The Food Craving Questionnaire-Trait in a bariatric surgery seeking population and ability to predict post-surgery weight loss at six months[J]. Eat Behav, 2012, 13(4):366-370. DOI PMID
[24]	Meule A, Heckel D, Kübler A. Factor structure and item ana-lysis of the Yale Food Addiction Scale in obese candidates for bariatric surgery[J]. Eur Eat Disord Rev, 2012, 20(5):419-422.
[25]	Hrabosky JI, White MA, Masheb RM, et al. Psychometric eva-luation of the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire for bariatric surgery candidates[J]. Obesity, 2008, 16(4):763-769. DOI PMID
[26]	Arnow B, Kenardy J, Agras WS. The Emotional Eating Scale:the development of a measure to assess coping with negative affect by eating[J]. Int J Eat Disord, 1995, 18(1):79-90.
[27]	王旋, 温贤秀, 苟莉, 等. 心脏康复依从性评估工具测量学属性的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(6):736-743. DOI
	Wang X, Wen XX, Gou L, et al. The cardiac rehabilitation adherence assessment tools:a systematic review of psychome-tric properties[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2024, 59(6):736-743.
[28]	Adolph TE, Tilg H. Western diets and chronic diseases[J]. Nat Med, 2024, 30(8):2133-2147.
[29]	Melkamu Asaye M, Gelaye KA, Matebe YH, et al. Assessment of content validity for a Neonatal Near Miss Scale in the con-text of Ethiopia[J]. Glob Health Action, 2021, 14(1):1983121.
[30]	陈艺蕾, 张晟, 柴菽彬, 等. 糖尿病中医疗效评价PRO量表的反应度研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2020, 35(4):2031-2033.
	Chen YL, Zhang S, Chai SB, et al. Responsiveness of diabetes PRO scale of the evaluation for the efficacy of TCM[J]. China J Tradit Chin Med Pharm, 2020, 35(4):2031-2033.
[31]	陈丽霞, 施慧, 朱德政, 等. 成人低血糖恐惧评估工具的质量评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9):1072-1079.
	Chen LX, Shi H, Zhu DZ, et al. Quality appraisal of hypog-lycemia fear assessment tools for adults[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2024, 59(9):1072-1079.
[32]	Lillis J, Hayes SC. Measuring avoidance and inflexibility in weight related problems[J]. Int J Behav Consult Ther, 2008, 4(4):348-354.
[33]	Cepeda-Benito A, Gleaves DH, Fernández MC, et al. The deve-lopment and validation of Spanish versions of the state and trait Food Cravings Questionnaires[J]. Behav Res Ther, 2000, 38(11):1125-1138. PMID