Application of a core care outcome classification system for liver transplantation patients

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.22.005

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective To analyze the application of a nursing outcome classification system in postoperative nursing of liver transplantation patients and its influence on the quality of clinical nursing records. Methods A total of 44 patients who underwent liver transplantation in a tertiary A general hospital in Zhejiang Province from March to August 2023 were selected by convenience sampling method. According to the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association International-Nursing Outcomes Classification linked scale of liver transplantation，nurses used the five-level classification method to score and review the liver transplantation patients on the day after surgery，3d after surgery，7d after surgery，14d after surgery，and on the day of discharge. The nursing outcome classification scores at 5 time points were statistically analyzed. The nursing records of 44 patients with liver transplantation from June to December 2022 were retrospectively collected by convenient sampling，and 44 nursing records before Nursing Outcomes Classification application and 44 nursing records after Nursing Outcomes Classification implementation were measured by Quality of Documentation of Nursing Diagnoses，Interventions and Outcomes. Results The Nursing Outcomes Classification scores of 15 nursing diagnoses were analyzed by single factor repeated measurement，and 9 of them showed continuous improvement and significant difference at 4 measurement time points（P<0.05）. After Nursing Outcomes Classification implementation，the total score of nursing record quality，nursing diagnosis and nursing outcome record quality scores were higher than those before implementation，with statistically significant differences（P<0.05）. Conclusion The nursing outcome classification system can be used to evaluate the postoperative health status and nursing effect of adult liver transplantation patients. It has high specialty specificity and can improve the quality of nursing records.

Key words: Liver Transplantation, Standardized Nursing Language, Nursing Outcomes Classification, Perioperative Nursing

摘要：

目的将护理结局分类系统应用于肝移植患者术后护理中，并探讨其对临床护理记录质量的影响。方法采用便利取样法，选取浙江省某三级甲等综合医院2022年6月—12月和2023年3月—8月期间行肝移植手术的患者各44例，两组分别为实施前组和实施后组。回顾性分析实施前组的护理记录，实施后组则在2023年通过肝移植护理诊断-护理结局链接量表进行评分。实施后组在术后当日、术后3 d、术后7 d、术后14 d及出院当日对护理结局进行评分，并对5个时间点的评分结果进行统计分析，使用护理诊断、干预和结果质量测量工具比较两组护理结局分类的应用效果。结果对15项护理诊断的护理结局分类评分进行单因素重复测量分析，其中9项结果显示4个测量时间点持续改善，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；护理结局分类实施后的护理病历质量总分、护理诊断和护理结局的记录质量评分均高于实施前，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论护理结局分类系统可用于评价成人肝移植患者的术后健康状态和护理效果，具有较高的专科特异性且能改善护理记录质量。

关键词: 肝移植, 标准化护理术语, 护理结局分类, 围手术期护理

HAN Linqiu, FENG Zhixian, WAN Pengxia, SHEN Mingyan. Application of a core care outcome classification system for liver transplantation patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2024, 59(22): 2723-2730.

韩琳秋, 冯志仙, 万鹏夏, 沈鸣雁. 肝移植患者护理结局分类系统的应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(22): 2723-2730.

Figures/Tables 4

Table 1 NANDA-NOC link scale for liver transplantation

Table 2 Comparison of general data of 2 groups of patients after liver transplantation

Table 3 Comparison of Q-DIO entries of 2 groups of nursing records before and after application（score）

Table 4 Repeated measure ANOVA and post hoc examination of NOC scores for 15 nursing diagnoses（score，$\bar{x}±s$，n=44）

References 21

[1]	吴薇. 中国器官移植发展报告(2020)[EB/OL].(2022-06-14)[2024-02-14]. https://www.cotdf.org.cn/article/1247.
	Wu W. China organ transplant development report(2020)[EB/OL]. (2022-06-14)[2024-02-14]. https://www.cotdf.org.cn/article/1247.
[2]	Hibi T, Wei Chieh AK, Chi-Yan CA, et al. Current status of liver transplantation in Asia[J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 82:4-8.
[3]	Silveira AT, Hohenreuther R, Schmidt NP, et al. Nursing team workload and the apache index of gravity of patients post liver transplantation:a cohort study[J]. Transplant Proc, 2022, 54(8):2295-2300.
[4]	Adistya VK, Nurjannah I, Subekti H. The interrater reliability of nursing outcome classification(NOC):“caregiver performance:direct care”[J]. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2018, 29(3):192-199. DOI PMID
[5]	杜佳敏, 谢红. 标准化护理语言的应用进展及其应用于养老护理的可行性分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2017, 52(7):874-878.
	Du JM, Xie H. Progress in the application of standardized nursing language and feasibility analysis of its application in old-age nursing[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2017, 52(7):874-878.
[6]	吴瑛. 护理结局分类系统的意义与概况[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2006, 41(6):567-569.
	Wu Y. Significance and survey of nursing outcome classification system[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2006, 41(6):567-569.
[7]	Maas. 护理结局分类[M]. 3版. 吴袁剑云译. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2006.
	Maas Ed. Classification of nursing outcomes[M]. 3rd ed. Wu YJY Trans. Beijing: Peking University Medical Press, 2006.
[8]	冯澳, 周丹, 林辉, 等. 基于护理结局分类系统的成人肝移植受者围术期护理方案的构建[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(21):3799-3807.
	Feng A, Zhou D, Lin H, et al. Construction of perioperative nursing program for adult liver transplant recipients based on nursing outcome classification[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2023, 37(21):3799-3807.
[9]	高会霞, 朱次菊, 徐嘉蔚. NNN-链接护理模式对肝移植术后患者健康结局和生活质量及睡眠状况的影响[J]. 国际护理学研究, 2023, 5(2):63-66.
	Gao HX, Zhu CJ, Xu JW. Effect of NNN-linked nursing mode on health outcomes,quality of life and sleep status of patients after liver transplantation[J]. Int J Nur, 2023, 5(2):63-66.
[10]	韩琳秋, 冯志仙, 万鹏夏, 等. 肝移植受者术后“NANDA-I、NOC、NIC”链接体系的构建[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2024, 30(15):2033-2041.
	Han LQ, Feng ZX, Wan PX, et al. Construction of “NANDA-I,NOC,NIC” link system in liver transplant recipients after operation[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2024, 30(15):2033-2041.
[11]	Müller-Staub M, Lunney M, Odenbreit M, et al. Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses,interventions and outcomes:the Q-DIO[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2009, 18(7):1027-1037. DOI PMID
[12]	Adubi IO, Olaogun AA, Adejumo PO. Effect of standardized nursing language continuing education programme on nurses’ documentation of care at University College Hospital, Ibadan[J]. Nurs Open, 2017, 5(1):37-44.
[13]	Gruden MK, Müller-Staub M, Pajnkihar M, et al. Standardization of Quality of Diagnoses,Interventions,and Outcomes(Q-DIO) measurement instrument for use in Slovenia[J]. Zdr Varst, 2021, 61(1):14-23.
[14]	Linch GF, Müller-Staub M, Moraes MA, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Quality of Diagnoses,Interventions and Outcomes(Q-DIO) instrument into Brazilian Portuguese[J]. Int J Nurs Knowl, 2012, 23(3):153-158.
[15]	Zhai Y, Yu Z, Zhang Q, et al. Transition to a new nursing information system embedded with clinical decision support:a mixed-method study using the HOT-fit framework[J]. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 2022, 22(1):310-330.
[16]	Llagostera-Reverter I, Luna-Aleixos D, Valero-Chillerón MJ, et al. Improving nursing assessment in adult hospitalization units:a secondary analysis[J]. Nurs Rep, 2023, 13(3):1148-1159.
[17]	De FLM, Vidor ID, Da Silva ACFE, et al. Fall prevention in hospitalized patients:evaluation through the nursing outcomes classification/NOC[J]. Appl Nurs Res, 2020, 54:151273.
[18]	Hartmann M, Szalai C, Saner FH. Hemostasis in liver transplantation:pathophysiology,monitoring,and treatment[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2016, 22(4):1541-1550.
[19]	Verbeek TA, Saner FH, Bezinover D. Hyponatremia and liver transplantation:a narrative review[J]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth, 2022, 6(5):1458-1466.
[20]	Brodosi L, Petta S, Petroni ML, et al. Management of diabetes in candidates for liver transplantation and in transplant recipients[J]. Transplantation, 2022, 106(3):462-478.
[21]	Lim S, Choi M, Kim H, et al. Sleep quality and related factors among liver transplant recipients in Korea:a cross-sectional study[J]. J Nurs Res, 2023, 31(4):e286.