中华护理杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (12): 1695-1703.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2026.12.015

• 护理质量与安全 • 上一篇    下一篇

246所医院住院患者自控镇痛护理现状的调查研究

周雁荣1(), 张海燕2,*(), 汪晖1, 何苗2, 杜玫洁1, 曾莹1, 王秀丽2   

  1. 1 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院护理部 武汉市 430030
    2 北京大学人民医院护理部 北京市 100044
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-11 出版日期:2026-06-20 发布日期:2026-06-12
  • *通讯作者: 张海燕,E-mail:zhanghaiyan@pkuph.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周雁荣:女,本科,主任护师,总护士长,E-mail:1002406585@qq.com
    第一联系人:

    周雁荣:实施研究、数据整理及分析、论文撰写及修改、基金支持;何苗、杜玫洁、曾莹、王秀丽:实施研究、数据整理及分析、论文撰写;张海燕、汪晖:研究指导、论文修改

  • 基金资助:
    2023年同济医院科研基金护理专项重点项目(2023C09)

Investigation of the current status of patient-controlled analgesia nursing practice in hospitalized patients across 246 hospitals

ZHOU Yanrong1(), ZHANG Haiyan2,*(), WANG Hui1, HE Miao2, DU Meijie1, ZENG Ying1, WANG Xiuli2   

  1. 1 Department of NursingTongji Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhan 430030, China
    2 Department of NursingPeking University People’s HospitalBeijing 100044, China
  • Received:2025-10-11 Online:2026-06-20 Published:2026-06-12
  • * Corresponding author: ZHANG Haiyan,E-mail:zhanghaiyan@pkuph.edu.cn
  • Funding program:
    Key Project of Nursing Special Program,2023 Tongji Hospital Research Fund(2023C09)

摘要:

目的 调查住院患者自控镇痛(patient-controlled analgesia,PCA)的护理现状,为进一步规范PCA管理及实践提供依据。方法 采用便利抽样法,于2025年5月使用自制问卷,对31个省(自治区、直辖市)中开展PCA的二级和三级医院护士进行调查。结果 共回收有效问卷4 675份,有效问卷回收率为96.33%。83.21%的护士所在医院或科室已建立PCA护理规范或流程;69.43%的护士所在医院或科室设有PCA管理多学科团队;70.76%的护士所在医院开展了PCA护理质量控制。在PCA临床护理实践中,静脉自控镇痛使用最普遍(95.42%),PCA主要用于术后镇痛(92.32%);麻醉科医生是使用前评估(70.14%)、泵安装(74.20%)与维护(60.64%)的主要人员;急性、慢性疼痛的首选评估时机分别为疼痛改变或发生不良反应时(73.39%)、每班评估(68.11%),镇痛效果主要采用疼痛主观评估法评估(91.51%);80.60%的护士所在科室要求书写PCA相关记录;92.75%的护士对患者进行健康教育。PCA主要护理实践问题为患者评估不充分或不准确(61.69%)、镇痛效果评价不全面(61.24%)等,PCA护理实践的主要障碍因素为PCA护理规范、标准或流程缺失(68.81%)、PCA相关知识缺乏(66.18%)等。结论 国内PCA护理管理体系已初步建立,但在多学科协作、质量控制及全流程评估等方面有待完善,护士的实践能力需进一步加强。

关键词: 疼痛, 患者自控镇痛, 护理, 现状调查

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the current status of patient-controlled analgesia(PCA) nursing practices in China and provide a basis for developing standardized PCA nursing procedures. Methods A cross-sectional survey was conducted in May 2025 using a convenience sampling method. A self-designed questionnaire was administered to nurses working in secondary and tertiary hospitals providing PCA services across 31 provinces(autonomous regions and municipalities). Results A total of 4 675 nurses participated,resulting in a valid response rate of 96.33%. Among them,83.21% reported that their hospitals or departments had established PCA nursing protocols or procedures;69.43% indicated the presence of a PCA multidisciplinary team;70.76% confirmed that PCA nursing quality control was implemented. Regarding clinical application,intravenous PCA was the most commonly used (95.42%),primarily for postoperative pain management(92.32%). Anesthesiologists were the main personnel responsible for pre-use assessment(70.14%),pump installation(74.20%),and maintenance(60.64%). The preferred assessment timing for acute pain was “when pain changed or adverse reactions occurred”(73.39%),“shift-based assessment”(68.11%). Subjective assessment tools remained the primary method for evaluating analgesic efficacy (91.51%). Documentation of PCA care was required in 80.60% of the departments,and 92.75% of nurses provided patient health education. Major practical issues included insufficient patient assessment(61.69%) and incomplete evaluation of analgesic effects(61.24%). Key barriers were the lack of standardized protocols/guidelines/procedures (68.81%) and insufficient related knowledge among nurses(66.18%). Conclusion While PCA nursing protocols have been preliminarily established in Chinese hospitals,multidisciplinary collaboration,quality control,and comprehensive process assessment require further improvement. Nurses’ PCA-related competencies also need further strengthening.

Key words: Pain, Patient Controlled Analgesia, Nursing Care, Current Status Investigation