中华护理杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (2): 133-141.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.02.001
• 心脏手术护理专题 • 下一篇
张临雪(
), 周家梅(
), 杨萍萍, 张金波, 罗明先, 李秀毛, 李珊, 曾璐
收稿日期:2024-03-07
出版日期:2025-01-20
发布日期:2025-01-23
*通讯作者:
周家梅,E-mail:zhoujiamei666@163.com作者简介:张临雪:女,硕士,护师,E-mail:3088267557@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Linxue(
), ZHOU Jiamei(
), YANG Pingping, ZHANG Jinbo, LUO Mingxian, LI Xiumao, LI Shan, ZENG Lu
Received:2024-03-07
Online:2025-01-20
Published:2025-01-23
摘要: 目的 探讨心脏手术患者术前至术后6个月衰弱的变化轨迹,分析其影响因素。方法 采用纵向研究设计、便利抽样法,选取2022年8月—2023年6月遵义市某三级甲等综合医院择期行心脏瓣膜置换或冠状动脉旁路移植的患者作为研究对象,在术前1天(T0)、术后1个月(T1)、术后3个月(T2)、术后6个月(T3)使用中文版Tilburg衰弱评估量表评估心脏手术患者的衰弱水平。采用增长混合模型识别轨迹类别,运用二元Logistic回归分析不同衰弱轨迹的影响因素。结果 T0纳入261例,T1~T3分别失访22、9、3例,最终纳入227例。共识别出低衰弱下降组和高衰弱维持组2种衰弱发展轨迹。年龄、使用镇静镇痛药物种类、步速、是否抑郁是心脏手术患者衰弱的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论 心脏手术患者存在2种衰弱发展轨迹,医护人员应针对衰弱的影响因素制订精准的护理措施,以改善心脏手术患者衰弱程度,提高其生活质量。
张临雪, 周家梅, 杨萍萍, 张金波, 罗明先, 李秀毛, 李珊, 曾璐. 心脏手术患者衰弱发展轨迹及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(2): 133-141.
ZHANG Linxue, ZHOU Jiamei, YANG Pingping, ZHANG Jinbo, LUO Mingxian, LI Xiumao, LI Shan, ZENG Lu. Study on the development trajectory and influencing factors of frailty in patients undergoing cardiac surgery[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2025, 60(2): 133-141.
![]() |
表2 各时间点心脏手术患者衰弱发生率及中文版Tilburg衰弱评估量表得分
Table 2 Incidence of frailty and the score of Tilburg Frailty Index at each time point in patients undergoing cardiac surgery
![]() |
![]() |
表3 心脏手术患者衰弱各变化趋势占比及不同时间点中文版Tilburg衰弱评估量表得分(n=227) 注:T0~T3分别代表术前1天、术后1个月、术后3个月、术后6个月。
Table 3 Trajectory in frailty of patients undergoing cardiac surgery and the score of Tilburg Frailty Index at different time points(n=227)
![]() |
![]() |
表5 心脏手术患者衰弱发展轨迹影响因素的二元Logistic回归分析(n=227)
Table 5 Binary Logistic regression analysis of factors influencing the trajectory of frailty development in cardiac surgery patients(n=227)
![]() |
| [1] |
马丽媛, 王增武, 樊静, 等. 《中国心血管健康与疾病报告2022》要点解读[J]. 中国全科医学, 2023, 26(32):3975-3994.
DOI |
| Ma LY, Wang ZW, Fan J, et al. Interpretation of report on cardiovascular health and diseases in China 2022[J]. Chin Gen Pract, 2023, 26(32):3975-3994. | |
| [2] | Graham A,Brown CH 4th. Frailty,aging,and cardiovascular surgery[J]. Anesth Analg, 2017, 124(4):1053-1060. |
| [3] | James K, Jamil Y, Kumar M, et al. Frailty and cardiovascular health[J]. J Am Heart Assoc, 2024, 13(15):e031736. |
| [4] | Wong CWY, Li PWC, Yu DSF, et al. Estimated prevalence of frailty and prefrailty in patients undergoing coronary artery or valvular surgeries/procedures:a systematic review and propor-tional meta-analysis[J]. Ageing Res Rev, 2024, 96:102266. |
| [5] | Kane AD, Knight J, Ayyash R. The perioperative management of frailty in patients presenting for vascular surgery[J]. Anaesth Intensive Care Med, 2022, 23(4):239-243. |
| [6] |
Jang AR, Sagong HE, Yoon JY. Frailty trajectory among community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults in Korea:evidence from the Korean longitudinal study of aging[J]. BMC Geriatr, 2022, 22:524.
DOI PMID |
| [7] | Chen WY, Liu CY, Shih CC, et al. Factors associated with frailty in patients undergoing cardiac surgery:a longitudinal study[J]. J Cardiovasc Nurs, 2022, 37(3):204-212. |
| [8] | 张临雪, 周家梅, 王菲, 等. 心脏手术病人术前衰弱评估与干预研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2023, 37(3):449-454. |
| Zhang LX, Zhou JM, Wang F, et al. Research progress of preoperative frailty assessment and intervention in patients undergoing cardiac surgery[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2023, 37(3):449-454. | |
| [9] |
Welstead M, Jenkins ND, Russ TC, et al. A systematic review of frailty trajectories:their shape and influencing factors[J]. Gerontologist, 2021, 61(8):e463-e475.
DOI PMID |
| [10] | 奚兴, 郭桂芳, 孙静. 中文版Tilburg衰弱评估量表的信效度研究[J]. 护理学报, 2013, 20(16):1-5. |
| Xi X, Guo GF, Sun J. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Tilburg Frailty Indicator[J]. J Nurs (China), 2013, 20(16):1-5. | |
| [11] | 叶维菲, 徐俊冕. “综合性医院焦虑抑郁量表”在综合性医院病人中的应用与评价[J]. 中国行为医学杂志, 1993, 2(3):17-19. |
| Ye WF, Xu JM. Application and evaluation of the “General Hospital Anxiety and Depression Inventory” in general hospital patients[J]. Chin J Behav Med, 1993, 2(3):17-19. | |
| [12] | 吴春薇, 王得新. 疲劳严重度量表中译本应用于脑梗死患者的临床与评价[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2007, 29(9):608-611. |
| Wu CW, Wang DX. Clinical application and assessment of the Chinese version of Fatigue Severity Scale in stroke patients[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2007, 29(9):608-611. | |
| [13] | 李格, 沈漁邨, 陈昌惠, 等. 老年痴呆简易测试方法研究:MMSE在城市老年居民中的测试[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 1988, 2(1):13-18. |
| Li G, Shen YC, Chen CH, et al. Study on simple test method for Alzheimer’s disease:MMSE test in urban elderly residents[J]. Chin Mental Health J, 1988, 2(1):13-18. | |
| [14] | 邱纪方, 张天友, 李建华, 等. 功能独立性测量的信度与效度研究[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 1998, 13(2):54-57. |
| Qiu JF, Zhang TY, Li JH, et al. Reliability and validity of Functional Independence Measure[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 1998, 13(2):54-57. | |
| [15] | Iwata K, Kitai T, Yoshimura Y, et al. Clinical impact of Functional Independent Measure(FIM) on 180-day readmission and mortality in elderly patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure[J]. Heart Vessels, 2021, 36(10):1536-1541. |
| [16] | 屈宁宁, 李可基. 国际体力活动问卷中文版的信度和效度研究[J]. 中华流行病学杂志, 2004, 25(3):265-268. |
| Qu NN, Li KJ. Study on the reliability and validity of International Physical Activity Questionnaire(Chinese Vision,IPAQ)[J]. Chin J Epidemiol, 2004, 25(3):265-268. | |
| [17] | 王翠, 鲁喦, 靳冰, 等. 老年住院患者衰弱发病的影响因素分析及与骨质疏松症的关系[J]. 山东医药, 2023, 63(8):33-37. |
| Wang C, Lu Y, Jin B, et al. Factors influencing frailty in geriatric inpatients and relationship between frailty and osteoporosis[J]. Shandong Med J, 2023, 63(8):33-37. | |
| [18] | Tamuleviciute-Prasciene E, Drulyte K, Jurenaite G, et al. Frailty and exercise training:how to provide best care after cardiac surgery or intervention for elder patients with valvular heartdisease[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018:9849475. |
| [19] | 陈坚, 王园, 崔艳丽, 等. 缺血性脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者经口摄食功能发展轨迹及影响因素分析[J]. 护理学报, 2023, 30(24):1-6. |
| Chen J, Wang Y, Cui YL, et al. Development trajectory of oral intake function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia and its influencing factors[J]. J Nurs (China), 2023, 30(24):1-6. | |
| [20] | Miguelena-Hycka J, Lopez-Menendez J, Prada PC, et al. Changes in frailty status after cardiac surgery. A prospective cohort study[J]. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 2022, 98:104568. |
| [21] | 张圆圆, 张馨月, 陈长香. 不同年龄和衰弱状态下社区老年人身心健康轨迹分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2021, 50(18):3194-3199. |
| Zhang YY, Zhang XY, Chen CX. Analysis of the developmental trajectory of physical and mental health of the elderly in different age stages and frailty state in urban communities[J]. Chongqing Med J, 2021, 50(18):3194-3199. | |
| [22] | 中华医学会心血管病学分会老年学组, 国家老年疾病临床医学研究中心(解放军总医院). 老年心血管疾病合并衰弱评估与管理中国专家共识[J]. 中华老年多器官疾病杂志, 2023, 22(7):481-491. |
| Geriatrics Group of the Cardiovascular Diseases Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, National Clinical Medical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases(People’s Liberation Army General Hospital).China expert consensus on assessment and management of senile cardiovascular diseases complicated with weakness[J]. Chin J Mult Organ Dis Elder, 2023, 22(7):481-491. | |
| [23] |
梁倩, 汪晓丽, 刘梦琪, 等. 多组分运动护理干预在老年慢性心力衰竭合并衰弱患者中的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(23):2821-2828.
DOI |
|
Liang Q, Wang XL, Liu MQ, et al. Effects of multi-component exercise nursing intervention on frailty in elderly patients with chronic heart failure[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(23):2821-2828.
DOI |
|
| [24] | 顾培培, 曾妃, 兰美娟, 等. 肺移植患者衰弱影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9):1122-1129. |
| Gu PP, Zeng F, Lan MJ, et al. Influencing factors of frailty in lung transplant patients:a Meta-analysis[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2024, 59(9):1122-1129. | |
| [25] | Engel JS, Tran J, Khalil N, et al. A systematic review of perioperative clinical practice guidelines for care of older adults living with frailty[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2023, 130(3):262-271. |
| [26] | Bae S, Shimada H, Lee S, et al. Subjective cognitive decline and frailty trajectories and influencing factors in Japanese community-dwelling older adults:a longitudinal study[J]. J Clin Med, 2023, 12(18):5803. |
| [27] |
Caspi-Avissar N, Grosman-Rimon L, Gohari J, et al. Clinical,surgical,and sociopsychological factors and depression after cardiothoracic surgery[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2021, 111(3):1064-1070.
DOI PMID |
| [28] | Vu T, Smith JA. The pathophysiology and management of depression in cardiac surgery patients[J]. Front Psychiatry, 2023,14:1195028. |
| [29] |
冯静宜, 张雪芳, 周雪迎, 等. 老年衰弱患者真实体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(23):2928-2935.
DOI |
| Feng JY, Zhang XF, Zhou XY, et al. The real experience of frailty in elderly patients:a qualitative Meta-synthesis[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2023, 58(23):2928-2935. |
| [1] | 中华护理学会静脉输液治疗专业委员会, 北京护理学会, (执笔:李佳, 李旭英, 覃惠英, 陈利芬, 吴珍明, 胡泽吟, 罗梦娜, 范育英, 吴嘉慧, 林宇萍, 王蕾, 孙文彦, 冯毕龙, 高伟, 李亚南, 侯罗娅, 李春燕. 中心静脉通路装置拔除护理专家共识[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1157-1162. |
| [2] | 周霞, 马艳艳, 师正坤, 于海霞, 周艳, 胡红玲, 李莜, 陈思思, 张京慧. 隧道式经股静脉PICC置入术在困难静脉通路婴幼儿中的应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1163-1170. |
| [3] | 黄萍, 李黎, 郭骊莉, 徐莹, 叶赟, 江淑芳. 与无针输液接头相关的导管相关性血流感染风险评估工具的构建与初步应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1171-1179. |
| [4] | 李佳, 张玉玲, 邢乐, 张利峰, 牛秀峰, 许莉. 早产儿经上肢置入PICC尖端继发性异位风险预测模型的建立与验证[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1180-1186. |
| [5] | 何娟, 赵蕾蕾, 叶冠军, 余艳芬, 傅晓君, 周琴. 1例双侧无名静脉及上腔静脉人工血管置换术后患者经上肢置入PICC的护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1187-1191. |
| [6] | 梁江淑渊, 曾妃, 何鹏, 谢梦珊, 江悦, 蒋宗恒, 王建茗. 静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合患者早期活动风险等级评估系统的构建及应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1192-1199. |
| [7] | 陈晨, 顾肖, 郭凡, 王敏, 倪兴梅, 黄琴, 程念开. 3种衰弱评估工具对急诊老年创伤患者不良结局的预测价值[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1200-1207. |
| [8] | 郑煜琳, 刘晋宁, 张静, 郭会敏, 谷艳梅, 张莉莉. 酒精性肝病患者肝移植术后再饮酒现状及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1208-1214. |
| [9] | 叶俊霜, 沈丽佳, 孟霞靓, 张玉姣, 蔡根莲, 邵碧云, 周亚辉, 张柳倩, 应金萍. 维持性血液透析患者对口腔衰弱认知和体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1215-1220. |
| [10] | 王芸姣, 杨玉金, 郑春艳, 彭菲津, 王淑贞, 蒋喜露, 周为民, 王薇, 张娜. 糖尿病下肢动脉硬化闭塞症患者介入术后康复护理方案的构建及应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1221-1229. |
| [11] | 杨明霞, 安冉, 臧金凤, 李春梅. 老年慢性病共病患者及照护者老老照护能力与自我忽视的相关性分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1230-1236. |
| [12] | 梁和静, 许鹊, 史云霞, 祖金美, 黄文静, 杨春旭, 郭明华, 王磊. 颈动脉内膜剥脱术围手术期护理质量评价指标的构建[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1237-1244. |
| [13] | 韩媛媛, 石玉竹, 尚文涵, 么莉. 870所三级甲等医院老年住院患者跌倒伤害发生现状与影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1245-1252. |
| [14] | 夏云芳, 王洪, 崔岱, 付真真, 朱敏. 1例弥漫性毒性甲状腺肿合并超敏反应综合征青少年患者的护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1253-1256. |
| [15] | 周益飞, 王海苹, 胡益环, 应莉, 罗松娜. 1例氢氟酸中毒并发呼吸心搏骤停患者的急救护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2026, 61(9): 1257-1260. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||