中华护理杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (12): 1800-1805.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.12.007

• 专科实践与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盆底康复管理质量评价指标体系的构建

王红燕(), 谢臻蔚, 张珂, 童宝琴, 冯素文()   

  1. 310006 杭州市 浙江大学医学院附属妇产科医院妇四科(王红燕,谢臻蔚,童宝琴),围产监护室(张珂),护理部(冯素文)
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-26 出版日期:2021-12-15 发布日期:2021-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 冯素文,E-mail: fengsw@zju.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:王红燕:女,硕士,主管护师,E-mail: whysammy@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省基础公益研究计划项目(LGF19H040016)

Establishment of a quality indicator system for pelvic floor rehabilitation management

WANG Hongyan(), XIE Zhenwei, ZHANG Ke, TONG Baoqin, FENG Suwen()   

  • Received:2021-03-26 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-20

摘要:

目的 构建盆底康复管理质量评价指标体系,为评价盆底康复管理质量提供参考依据。 方法 以Donabedian的“结构-过程-结果”三维质量评价模型为理论基础,通过文献检索、德尔菲法、层次分析法确立盆底康复管理质量评价指标体系。结果 2轮专家函询的问卷回收率均为100%,专家权威系数均为0.950,肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.168、0.124(均P<0.05)。最终形成的盆底康复管理质量评价指标体系包括一级指标3项、二级指标9项、三级指标42项。 结论 该研究构建的盆底康复管理质量评价指标体系具有较高的实用性和科学性,可为盆底康复管理质量评价提供参考。

关键词: 盆底康复, 质量评价指标, 德尔菲法, Donabedian模型, 护理

Abstract:

Objective To develop a quality indicator system for pelvic floor rehabilitation management. Methods A comprehensive method,including literature review,Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process,was adopted to establish a quality indicator system for pelvic floor rehabilitation management. Results 2 rounds of expert consultations resulted in the effective response rates of 100%,with the authority coefficients of 0.950,and the coordination coefficients of 0.168 and 0.124 respectively(P<0.05). The final evaluation indicators for pelvic floor reha-bilitation management included 3 first-level indicators,9 second-level indicators,and 42 third-level indicators. Conclusion The quality evaluation indicator system for pelvic floor rehabilitation management is highly practical and scientific,which can provide references for evaluation criteria of quality in pelvic floor rehabilitation.

Key words: Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation, Quality Evaluation, Delphi Method, Donabedian Model, Nursing Care