Abstract:

Objective To establish an evaluation index system and an effectiveness index for PICC and PORT. Methods The Delphi method was adopted to identify the indicators and their weight coefficients in the evaluation index system for evaluating PICC and PORT through two rounds of expert consultation. Then the effectiveness index for evaluating the effect of PICC and PORT was established based on the synthetical index method. Results The responses rates of two rounds of Delphi consultation were all 100%. The experts’ authoritative coefficient was 0.87. The coordination coefficients of the two rounds of Delphi consultation were 0.283 and 0.306（both of them P<0.001）. The evaluation index system for evaluating the effect of PICC and PORT was established,including 3 primary indicators,9 secondary indicators,and 13 tertiary indicators. Then the effectiveness index for evaluating the effect of PICC and PORT was established based on exponential formula and synthetical index formula. Conclusion The established evaluation index system and the effectiveness index for evaluating the effect of PICC and PORT are scientific,reliable and feasible,providing a quantitative method for decision makers and administrators to make holistic comparison of the effect of PICC and PORT.

Key words: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter, Implantable Venous Access Port, Delphi Technique, Synthetical Index Method, Evaluation Index, Economic Evaluation

摘要：

目的 构建PICC和植入式静脉输液港（implantable venous access port,PORT）静脉输液技术效果评价指标体系及综合效果指数。方法 采用德尔菲法,通过2轮专家咨询,确定评价两种中心静脉输液技术效果的指标体系及权重。之后通过综合指数法,对指标体系中的指标按指数化公式进行指数化,最终根据综合指数公式,构建能综合评价两种中心静脉输液效果的综合效果指数。结果 2轮专家咨询的问卷回收率均为100%,专家权威系数为0.87。第1轮和第2轮整体指标的肯德尔协调系数分别为0.283、0.306（均P<0.001）。形成了两种中心静脉输液技术效果评价指标体系,包含3项一级指标、9项二级指标、13项三级指标。根据指数化公式及综合指数公式,最终构建了两种中心静脉输液技术的综合效果指数。结论 本研究构建的两种中心静脉输液技术效果评价指标及综合效果指数具有较好的科学性、可靠性和实用性,为决策者和管理者从整体上评价2种技术的综合输液效果提供了量化的方法。

关键词: 经外周置入中心静脉导管, 植入式静脉输液港, 德尔菲技术, 综合指数法, 评价指标, 经济学评价