Abstract:

The number of expert consensus publications has been increasing year by year as an industry guidance document. However，due to the lack of unified reporting guidelines and methodological standards，the current published expert consensuses in nursing exhibit inconsistent writing formats and varying quality. This article combines the quality evaluation points for expert opinions from the Jonna Briggs Institute in Australia，focusing on 6 aspects，covering the authority of the expert team，clarity of viewpoint expression，adequacy of evidence-based foundation，standardization of the consensus-reaching process，taking into account of interests of relevant research populations，and the potential for application in specific clinical settings. These points are introduced as review criteria for expert consensus papers，aiming to provide references for improving the quality and standardization of expert consensus papers in the future.

Key words: Expert Consensus, Quality Appraisal, Peer Review, Nursing Care

摘要：

专家共识作为一种行业指导性文件，其发表数量逐年增多。由于尚缺乏统一的论文报告指南和方法学规范，目前护理领域发表的专家共识存在撰写格式不统一、质量参差不齐的现象。该文结合澳大利亚乔安娜布里格斯研究所循证卫生保健中心关于专家意见类文章的质量评价要点，重点从观点是否来自该领域有影响力的专家、观点表述是否清晰、证据基础是否充分、达成共识的过程是否规范、是否以研究相关人群利益为中心、是否能在一定情境下推广应用6个方面，介绍了对护理领域专家共识论文的质量评价要点，为今后提升专家共识论文的质量和规范性提供参考。

关键词: 专家共识, 质量评价, 同行评审, 护理