中华护理杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (10): 1202-1208.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2025.10.008

• 专科护理实践与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

心脏植入式电子装置患者延续性护理方案的构建及应用

兰兰(), 罗雪, 杨伟梅, 王素芬, 何细飞()   

  1. 430030 武汉市 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院护理部
  • 收稿日期:2024-09-18 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-05-13
  • 通讯作者: 何细飞,E-mail:26817600@qq.com
  • 作者简介:兰兰:女,本科,主管护师,E-mail:109435017@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    2022年武汉同济医院科研基金护理专项(2022D09)

Construction and application of a continuous care program for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

LAN Lan(), LUO Xue, YANG Weimei, WANG Sufen, HE Xifei()   

  • Received:2024-09-18 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-13

摘要:

目的 基于奥马哈系统构建心脏植入式电子装置(cardiac implantable electronic device,CIED)患者延续性护理方案,并评价其应用效果,以期为CIED患者延续性护理提供参考。方法 以奥马哈系统为理论框架,在文献回顾和半结构式访谈的基础上,经过2轮专家函询构建基于奥马哈系统的CIED患者延续性护理方案。采用便利抽样法,选取武汉市某三级甲等医院心血管内科的CIED患者为应用对象。将2024年4月—6月收治的61例患者设为试验组,实施基于奥马哈系统的延续性护理方案;将2023年12月—2024年3月收治的61例患者设为对照组,实施常规护理措施。比较两组入院时及出院后1个月奥马哈系统成效评分、出院后3个月的生存质量。结果 最终两组各纳入59例患者,试验组出院后1个月奥马哈系统成效评分高于对照组,出院后3个月生存质量高于对照组(P<0.001)。结论 应用基于奥马哈系统构建的CIED患者延续性护理方案可以提高患者的疾病认知水平,促进健康行为,提高其自我效能,改善生存质量。

关键词: 心脏植入式电子装置, 奥马哈系统, 延续性护理

Abstract:

Objective To develop a continuous care program for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices(CIED) utilizing the Omaha system,and to assess its effectiveness. This study aims to provide a reference for the continuous care of patients with CIED. Methods Using the Omaha system as the theoretical framework,based on literature search and semi-structured interviews,a continuity of care program for CIED patients based on the Omaha system was constructed through 2 rounds of expert inquiry. Convenience sampling method was used to select CIED implant patients from the cardiovascular department of a tertiary hospital in Wuhan as the research subjects. 61 patients admitted from April to June 2024 were assigned as an experimental group with a continuity of care program based on the Omaha system;61 patients admitted from December 2023 to March 2024 were designated as a control group and received routine nursing measures. The Omaha performance indicators and quality of life at 3 months after discharge were compared between 2 groups upon admission and 1 month after discharge. Results The final 2 groups each included 59 patients. A month after discharge,the Omaha efficacy index in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group,and 3 months after discharge,the quality of life in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group(P<0.001). Conclusion The CIED patient continuity of care program based on the Omaha system could improve patients’ cognitive level,promote healthy behavior,enhance their self-efficacy,and improve their quality of life.

Key words: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices, Omaha System, Continuous Care