决策参与量表的汉化及在颅内肿瘤患者家属中的信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.13.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的汉化决策参与量表,并及在颅内肿瘤患者家属中检验其信效度。方法基于Brislin翻译模式对决策参与量表进行翻译、回译和跨文化调试,形成中文版决策参与量表。2021年9月—2022年1月,采用便利抽样法,选取乌鲁木齐市222名颅内肿瘤患者家属进行调查,2周后从中随机抽取30名家属进行重测,检验量表的信效度。结果中文版决策参与量表共有10个条目,探索性因子分析提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为84.078%。量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.850,折半信度系数为0.819,重测信度系数为0.809。量表的条目内容效度指数为0.833~1.000,全体一致内容效度指数为0.900。验证性因子分析结果显示,卡方自由度比值为2.967、拟合优度指数为0.929、相对拟合指数为0.956、规准适配指数为0.936、非规准适配指数为0.929、增量拟合指数为0.957、近似误差均方根为0.094。结论中文版决策参与量表具有良好的信效度,可以作为肿瘤患者家属医疗决策参与的评估工具。

关键词: 肿瘤, 家属, 决策参与, 信度, 效度, 护理

Abstract:

Objective To test the reliability and validity of Decisional Engagement Scale for family members of cancer patients（DES-10） in Chinese version. Methods The Chinese version of DES-10 was translated,back translated and modified for cultural adaptation according to Brislin translation model. From September 2021 to January 2022,222 family members of patients with intracranial tumor in Urumqi were selected by convenience sampling,and 30 family members of them were randomly selected to retest after 2 weeks to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Chinese version of the scale has 10 items. The exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 84.078%. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.850;the split-half reliability was 0.819;the test-retest reliability was 0.809. The Item-level Content Validity Index was 0.833~1.000;the Scale-level Content Validity Index was 0.900. The confirmatory factor analysis showed：χ²/df=2.967,Goodness Fit Index=0.929,Comparative Fit Index=0.956,Normed Fit Index=0.936,Tucker-Lewis Index=0.929,Incremental Fit Index=0.957,Root Mean Square Error of Approximation=0.094. Conclusion The Chinese version of DES-10 has good reliability and validity. It could be used as an effective tool to evaluate the medical decisional engagement for family members of cancer patients.

Key words: Cancer, Family Members, Decisional Engagement, Reliability, Validity, Nursing Care

王丽萍, 蔺波, 侯铭, 祖百法, 李萍. 决策参与量表的汉化及在颅内肿瘤患者家属中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(13): 1660-1665.

WANG Liping, LIN Bo, HOU Ming, ZU Baifa, LI Ping. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Decisional Engagement Scale in family members of patients with intracranial cancers[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(13): 1660-1665.

图/表 2

参考文献 23

[1]	Martinez-Tapia C, Canoui-Poitrine F, Caillet P, et al. Preferences for surrogate designation and decision-making process in older versus younger adults with cancer:a comparative cross-sectional study[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2019, 102(3):429-435. DOI PMID
[2]	刘俊荣, 吴开, 谢汉春. 医疗决策模式与决策主体的选择倾向研究[J]. 医学与哲学(A), 2018, 39(10):14-20.
	Liu JR, Wu K, Xie HC. Study on medical decision-making mo-dels and decision-makers’ preferences[J]. Med Philos(A), 2018, 39(10):14-20.
[3]	Shin DW, Cho J, Roter DL, et al. Attitudes toward family involvement in cancer treatment decision making:the perspectives of patients,family caregivers,and their oncologists[J]. Psy-chooncology, 2017, 26(6):770-778.
[4]	Eskes AM, Van Ingen CHNM, Horst MEE, et al. The experiences of family caregivers who participated in a family involvement program after cancer surgery:a qualitative study[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2020, 49:101835. DOI URL
[5]	葛高琪, 邹辉煌, 胡玉娜, 等. 重症监护室患者家属习得性无助感现状及影响因素分析[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2021, 38(8):38-41.
	Ge GQ, Zou HH, Hu YN, et al. Status quo of learned helplessness in family members of intensive care unit patients and its influencing factors[J]. Nurs J Chin PLA, 2021, 38(8):38-41.
[6]	高茜, 胡建萍, 何东梅, 等. 终末期患者与家属治疗决策一致性研究[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(10):80-83.
	Gao Q, Hu JP, He DM, et al. Consistency on end-of-life decision-making in terminal-stage patients and their families[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2019, 34(10):80-83.
[7]	杨鹤林, 李静静, 耿彤, 等. 精神分裂症患者及家属参与医疗决策的意愿[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2014, 28(3):179-184.
	Yang HL, Li JJ, Geng T, et al. Desires of being involved in medical decisions in patients with schizophrenia and their family members[J]. Chin Ment Heal J, 2014, 28(3):179-184.
[8]	Zhang J, Yang D, Deng Y, et al. The willingness and actual si-tuation of Chinese cancer patients and their family members participating in medical decision-making[J]. Psychooncology, 2015, 24(12):1663-1669. DOI PMID
[9]	吴菲霞, 温焕, 陶文雯, 等. 患者家属参与医疗决策的现状与启示[J]. 中国医疗管理科学, 2020, 10(2):68-72.
	Wu FX, Wen H, Tao WW, et al. Family participation in medical decision-making[J]. Chin J Med Manag Sci, 2020, 10(2):68-72.
[10]	Hoerger M, Chapman BP, Mohile SG, et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of the Decisional Engagement Scale(DES-10):a patient-reported psychosocial survey for quality cancer care[J]. Psychol Assess, 2016, 28(9):1087-1100. DOI URL
[11]	Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation,adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research:a clear and user-friendly guideline[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2011, 17(2):268-274. DOI URL
[12]	孙云峰, 潘锋, 邵永良, 等. CT及MRI灌注成像对颅内血管外皮细胞瘤和脑膜瘤的鉴别诊断分析[J]. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2020, 27(S1):5-6.
	Sun YF, Pan F, Shao YL, et al. Differential diagnosis of intracranial hemangiopericytoma and meningioma by CT and MRI perfusion imaging[J]. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2020, 27(S1):5-6.
[13]	周雯, 毛靖, 闻曲, 等. 晚期肿瘤患者及家属对预先指示态度的一致性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(1):27-32.
	Zhou W, Mao J, Wen Q, et al. Consistency in attitudes toward advance directive and life sustaining treatments between end-of-life cancer patients and their family members[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2018, 53(1):27-32.
[14]	孙尔鸿, 高宇, 叶旭春. 技术焦虑量表的汉化及其在老年群体中的信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(3):380-384. DOI
	Sun EH, Gao Y, Ye XC. Validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Technophobia Scale in older adults[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(3):380-384.
[15]	张学颖, 尹雪梅, 张晓翠, 等. 新生儿重症监护室父亲支持量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(8):1275-1280. DOI
	Zhang XY, Yin XM, Zhang XC, et al. The reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of the Fathers’ Support Scale:neonatal intensive care unit[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(8):1275-1280.
[16]	夏幸阁, 赵丽洁, 张碧瑜, 等. 婴儿母亲育儿支持问卷的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(11):1649-1654. DOI
	Xia XG, Zhao LJ, Zhang BY, et al. The sinicization of Parenting Support for Mothers of Infants and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(11):1649-1654.
[17]	孙晶, 郑秀利, 杨支兰, 等. 痴呆患者居家老年照顾者生活质量评估量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(12):1901-1906.
	Sun J, Zheng XL, Yang ZL, et al. Sinicization of the Dementia Quality of Life Scale for Older Family Carers of Patients and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(12):1901-1906.
[18]	李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
	Li Z, Liu Y. Nursing research methods[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018.
[19]	张晨, 周云仙. 我国护理测量工具文献中内容效度指数应用误区分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(4):86-88,92.
	Zhang C, Zhou YX. Analysis on errors regarding content validity index used in evaluation of measurement tools in Chinese nursing literature[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2020, 35(4):86-88,92.
[20]	吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2011.
	Wu ML. Structural equation model:AMOS operation and application[M]. Chongqing: Chongqing University Press, 2011.
[21]	Kim H, Deatrick JA, Ulrich CM. Ethical frameworks for surrogates’ end-of-life planning experiences[J]. Nurs Ethics, 2017, 24(1):46-69. DOI URL
[22]	王乐. 儒家文化背景下医疗决策中的自主问题[J]. 医学与社会, 2022, 35(1):26-30,35.
	Wang L. Autonomy in medical decision-making under the back-ground of Confucian culture[J]. Med Soc, 2022, 35(1):26-30,35.
[23]	Qureshi AA, Mohammad J, Mohammed Elkandow AE, et al. The end-of-life care in the emergency department setting with respect to the Middle East countries and comparison with the Western countries[J]. Turk J Emerg Med, 2022, 22(1):1-7. DOI URL