中华护理杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (4): 493-501.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.04.017

• 证据综合研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非药物管理对成人择期手术术前焦虑影响的系统评价再评价

包磊(), 朱丽群, 唐为定(), 陈吉祥, 周英凤, 韩小云, 舒芳芳, 曹松梅, 庄若, 殷婷   

  1. 212000 镇江市 江苏大学附属医院手术室(包磊,唐为定,殷婷),护理部(朱丽群,曹松梅,庄若),普外科(陈吉祥);复旦大学护理学院(周英凤);常州市第一人民医院手术室(韩小云);江苏大学医学院(舒芳芳)
  • 收稿日期:2021-07-06 出版日期:2022-02-20 发布日期:2022-02-11
  • 通讯作者: 唐为定,E-mail: tangweiding@163.com
  • 作者简介:包磊:男,硕士,主管护师,澳大利亚JBI循证护理中心系统评价研究员,E-mail: arisibl@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    镇江市2021年度“金山英才”高层次领军人才培养计划科研项目(YLJ202115);2020年度镇江市科技创新资金(政策引导计划—软科学研究)项目(RK2020034)

An overview of systematic reviews on efficacy of nonpharmacological management of preoperative anxiety in adult patients undergoing elective surgery

BAO Lei(), ZHU Liqun, TANG Weiding(), CHEN Jixiang, ZHOU Yingfeng, HAN Xiaoyun, SHU Fangfang, CAO Songmei, ZHUANG Ruo, YIN Ting   

  • Received:2021-07-06 Online:2022-02-20 Published:2022-02-11

摘要:

目的 对成人择期手术术前焦虑的非药物管理措施进行系统评价的再评价。方法 计算机检索中国知网、维普全文数据库、万方全文数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库以及澳大利亚乔安娜布里格斯研究所循证卫生保健中心数据库、Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、psycINFO数据库中有关成人择期手术术前焦虑的非药物管理的系统评价,检索时限为建库至2021年8月,由2名研究人员独立进行文献筛选、资料提取,分别对纳入的系统评价和结局指标进行质量评价,并进行证据质量评价和分析。结果 共纳入19篇系统评价,评价结果显示,2篇系统评价的方法学质量为低级,17篇系统评价的方法学质量为极低。评价了9项非药物管理措施的证据,结果显示,优化术前环节的管理、应用非药物技术对预防或缓解术前焦虑有积极影响。结论 非药物管理在一定程度上可预防或缓解成人择期手术患者的术前焦虑,但系统评价的方法学质量和证据的质量均较低,临床实践需谨慎采纳相关证据,并进一步开展更规范、严谨的研究。

关键词: 术前焦虑, 管理, 非药物, 系统评价再评价, 循证护理学

Abstract:

Objective To overview the systematic reviews on efficacy of non-pharmacological management of preoperative anxiety in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Methods In August 2021,CNKI,VIP Full-text database,Wanfang Full-text Database,China Biomedical Literature Database and Joanna Briggs Institute,the Cochrane Library,PubMed,Embase,CINAHL,and psycINFO databases were searched to collect systematic reviews or meta-analysis on the efficacy of non-pharmacological management of preoperative anxiety in adult patients undergoing elective surgery. 2 researchers screened systematic reviews and extracted the data independently. AMSTAR 2 scale and GRADE system were used to assess the quality of included systematic reviews. Results A total of 19 systematic reviews were included. The evaluation results showed that the methodological quality of 2 pieces of the literature was low and the methodological quality of 17 was critically low. Evidence for 9 non-pharmaceutical management interventions was evaluated. The results showed that optimization of preoperative management and application of non-pharmaceutical techniques had positive effects on preventing or alleviating preoperative anxiety. However,the grade of evidence quality is not high,and only a piece of evidence is intermediate. Conclusion Non-pharmacological management may relieve preoperative anxiety relatively. However,the methodological quality and evidence quality of the study are low,so it is necessary to use evidence carefully and carry out more standardized and rigorous studies.

Key words: Preoperative Anxiety, Management, Non-Pharmaceutical, Overview of Systematic Reviews, Evidence-Based Nursing