不同长度外周静脉导管在减重手术患者围手术期的应用效果评价

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.04.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的比较不同长度外周静脉导管在减重手术患者围手术期的临床应用效果，探究减重手术等肥胖患者的适宜静脉通路。方法采用定点连续抽样法，选取2022年8月—12月在浙江某三级甲等医院进行减重手术的住院患者作为研究对象。采用分层区组随机法分为试验组1（迷你中长导管）、试验组2（中长导管）和对照组（短外周静脉导管）。比较3组导管相关并发症发生率、因并发症拔管率、导管留置时间和发生首次导管相关并发症的时间。结果共纳入186例患者，每组62例。试验组1、试验组2和对照组的导管相关并发症发生率为25.81%、8.06%、58.06%，因并发症拔管率为19.35%、4.84%、41.94%，导管留置时间为7.00（6.00，7.00）、7.00（6.00，7.00）、6.00（3.00，6.25） d，3组比较，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两两比较结果显示，试验组1和对照组、试组验2和对照组、试验组1和试验组2，导管相关并发症发生率、因并发症拔管率差异均具有统计学意义（P<0.017）；在导管留置时间上，试验组1和试验组2均长于对照组，差异具有统计学意义（P<0.017），试验组1和试验组2比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.017）。结论迷你中长导管和中长导管并发症发生率低于短外周静脉导管，留置时间与减重手术围手术期时间一致，适宜在减重手术等肥胖患者中应用。

关键词: 迷你中长导管, 中长导管, 短外周静脉导管, 血管通路, 减重手术, 肥胖, 并发症, 护理

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the appropriate venous access for obese patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery by comparing the clinical outcomes of different lengths of peripheral intravenous catheters. Methods Inpatients who underwent bariatric surgery in a tertiary hospital in Zhejiang from August 2022 to December 2022 were selected as the study population using a fixed-point continuous convenience sampling method. A stratified block randomisation method was used to divide the group into an experimental group 1（mini-midline catheters），an experimental group 2（midline catheters） and a control group（short peripheral intravenous catheters，Short PIVCs）. The incidence of catheter-related complications，the rate of extubation due to complications，the duration of catheter retention，the time to first catheter-related complication were compared in the 3 groups. Results A total of 186 patients were included，with 62 patients in each group. The overall incidence of catheter-related complications in experimental group 1，experimental group 2，and control group were 25.81%，8.06%，and 58.06%. The extubation rates due to complications were 19.35%，4.84%，and 41.94%，and the duration of catheter retention was 7.00（6.00，7.00） d，7.00（6.00，7.00） d，6.00（3.00，6.25） d. The differences were statistically different（P<0.05） when comparing the 3 groups. Among them，the differences in the overall incidence of catheter-related complications and the rate of extubation due to complications were statistically significant when comparing experimental group 1 with the control group，experimental group 2 with the control group，and experimental group 1 with experimental group 2（P<0.017）；the duration of catheter retention in both experimental group 1 and experimental group 2 were higher than it in the control group，and the differences were statistically different（P<0.017）. Conclusion The complication rate of mini-midline catheters and midline catheters is lower than that of short ones，and the indwelling time is consistent with the perioperative period of metabolic and bariatric surgery，which is suitable for use in patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery.

Key words: Mini-Midline Catheters, Midline Catheters, Short Peripheral Intravenous Catheters, Vascular Access, Bariatric Surgery, Obesity, Complications, Nursing Care

杨小惠, 刘畅, 于卫华, 陈炯煌, 盛婉婷, 曹秀珠, 曾旭芬, 金向红, 赵林芳. 不同长度外周静脉导管在减重手术患者围手术期的应用效果评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(4): 401-407.

YANG Xiaohui, LIU Chang, YU Weihua, CHEN Jionghuang, SHENG Wanting, CAO Xiuzhu, ZENG Xufen, JIN Xianghong, ZHAO Linfang. Study on the application of different-length peripheral intravenous catheters in patients undergoing metabolic and bariatric surgery：a randomized clinical trial[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2024, 59(4): 401-407.

图/表 4

表1 3组一般资料的比较

Table 1 Comparison of baseline variables of 3 groups

表2 3组外周静脉导管留置情况的比较

Table 2 Peripheral venous catheter indwelling in 3 groups

表3 3组导管相关并发症发生率的比较[例（百分率，%）]

Table 3 Comparison of complications in 3 groups[cases（percentage，%）]

图1 3组导管生存分析图

Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier survival curves for the compared catheter groups

参考文献 25

[1]	Blüher M. Obesity:global epidemiology and pathogenesis[J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2019, 15(5):288-298. DOI
[2]	Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 377(1):13-27. DOI URL
[3]	Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes-5-year outcomes[J]. N Engl J Med, 2017, 376(7):641-651. DOI URL
[4]	IFSO. 7th IFSO global registry report,2022[R]. Miami:ISFO, 2022.
[5]	Eisenberg D, Shikora SA, Aarts E, et al. 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery(ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO):indications for metabolic and bariatric surgery[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis,2022, 18(12):1345-1356. DOI PMID
[6]	Piredda M, Biagioli V, Barrella B, et al. Factors affecting difficult peripheral intravenous cannulation in adults:a prospective observational study[J]. J Clin Nurs, 2017, 26(7/8):1074-108 DOI URL
[7]	Keogh S, Shelverton C, Flynn J, et al. Implementation and evaluation of short peripheral intravenous catheter flushing guidelines:a stepped wedge cluster randomised trial[J]. BMC Med, 2020, 18(1):252. DOI
[8]	Miliani K, Taravella R, Thillard D, et al. Peripheral venous catheter related adverse events:evaluation from a multicentre epidemiological study in France(the CATHEVAL Project)[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(1):e168637.
[9]	Marsh N, Webster J, Ullman AJ, et al. Peripheral intravenous catheter non-infectious complications in adults:a systematic re-view and meta-analysis[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2020, 76(12):3346-3362. DOI URL
[10]	Pavelkova K, Lisova K, Blahova P, et al. Comparison of 12-cm versus 6-cm long peripheral catheters in patients with difficult intravenous access(DIVA)[J]. J Vasc Access, 2022, 23(1):94-97. DOI URL
[11]	Qin KR, Ensor N, Barnes R, et al. Standard versus long peripheral catheters for multiday Ⅳ therapy:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Pediatrics, 2021, 147(2):e2020000877.
[12]	Chopra V, Kaatz S, Swaminathan L, et al. Variation in use and outcomes related to midline catheters:results from a multicentre pilot study[J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2019, 28(9):714-720. DOI URL
[13]	Tripathi S, Kumar S, Kaushik S. The practice and complications of midline catheters:a systematic review[J]. Crit Care Med, 2021, 49(2):e140-e150. DOI PMID
[14]	Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, et al. Infusion therapy standards of practice,8th edition[J]. J Infus Nurs, 2021, 44(Suppl 1):S1-S224. DOI URL
[15]	中华护理学会医院感染管理专业委员会, 中华护理学会静脉输液治疗专业委员会. 输液连接装置安全管理专家共识[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(23):2821-2824. DOI
	Hospital Infection Management Committee of Chinese Nursing Association,Intravenous Therapy Committee of Chinese Nurs-ing Association. Expert consensus on safety management of transfusion connection devices for vascular access[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(23):2821-2824. DOI
[16]	中华护理学会静脉输液治疗专业委员会. 临床静脉导管维护操作专家共识[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(9):1334-1342. DOI
	Intravenous Therapy Committee of Chinese Nursing Associa-tion. Expert consensus on venous catheter maintenance[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(9):1334-1342. DOI
[17]	Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices:a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies[J]. Mayo Clin Proc, 2006, 81(9):1159-1171. DOI URL
[18]	Fabiani A, Eletto V, Dreas L, et al. Midline or long peripheral catheters in difficult venous access conditions?A comparative study in patients with acute cardiovascular diseases[J]. Am J Infect Control, 2020, 48(10):1158-1165. DOI PMID
[19]	Zhao L, Fan X, Zhao L, et al. Midline catheter tip position and catheter-related complications in antimicrobial therapy:a multi-center randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2023, 141:104476. DOI URL
[20]	Sharp R, Esterman A, Mccutcheon H, et al. The safety and efficacy of midlines compared to peripherally inserted central catheters for adult cystic fibrosis patients:a retrospective,observational study[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2014, 51(5):694-702. DOI URL
[21]	Chopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S, et al. The Michigan appropriateness guide for intravenous catheters(MAGIC):results from a multispecialty panel using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2015, 163(Suppl 6):S1-S40. DOI URL
[22]	赵林芳, 蔡志云, 樊小朋, 等. 中等长度静脉导管置管不同尖端位置的效果比较[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(5):517-524. DOI
	Zhao LF, Cai ZY, Fan XP, et al. Application comparison of different tip positions of midline catheters[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(5):517-524. DOI
[23]	Elia F, Ferrari G, Molino P, et al. Standard-length catheters vs long catheters in ultrasound-guided peripheral vein cannulation[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2012, 30(5):712-716. DOI PMID
[24]	Tran AT, Rizk E, Aryal DK, et al. Incidence of midline catheter complications among hospitalized patients[J]. J Infus Nurs, 2023, 46(1):28-35. DOI PMID
[25]	李旭英, 孙红, 魏涛, 等. 外周静脉留置针不同拔管时机的随机对照研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(2):272-277. DOI
	Li XY, Sun H, Wei T, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled study on removal indication of peripheral venous indwelling needle[J]. J Infus Nurs, 2020, 55(2):272-277.