中华护理杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 1072-1075.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.07.021

• 医院感染控制 • 上一篇    下一篇

硅油附着眼科手术器械清洗方式及评价方法的研究

唐媛,马思文,陈燕燕(),张佩华,黄小琼,陈茹   

  1. 325000 温州市 温州医科大学眼视光与生物医学工程学院(唐媛,马思文);温州医科大学附属眼视光医院护理部(陈燕燕,张佩华,黄小琼,陈茹)
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-06 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2020-07-16
  • 通讯作者:
  • 作者简介:唐媛:女,本科(硕士在读),护士,E-mail:1969813035@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家卫生计生委科学研究基金——浙江省医药卫生重大科技计划重点项目(WKJ-ZJ-1727)

Study on cleaning methods and evaluation approaches of silicone oil-attached ophthalmic surgical instruments

TANG Yuan,MA Siwen,CHEN Yanyan(),ZHANG Peihua,HUANG Xiaoqiong,CHEN Ru   

  • Received:2019-12-06 Online:2020-07-15 Published:2020-07-16

摘要:

目的 探讨硅油附着眼科手术器械的最佳清洗方式及有效评价方法。 方法 将400件硅油附着眼科手术器械随机分成A、B、C、D共4组,A组采用标准清洗法,B组采用碱性清洗剂预洗+标准清洗法,C组采用预处理清洗剂预洗+标准清洗法,D组采用95%乙醇溶液与预处理清洗剂预洗+标准清洗法。并采用目测法、触摸法及挂水法评价上述4种清洗方式对硅油附着眼科手术器械的清洗效果。 结果 4种清洗方式对硅油附着眼科手术器械的清洗合格率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),其中D组清洗合格率最高。3种方法评价清洗合格率结果为目测法98%,触摸法100%,挂水法97%;3种评价方法消耗时间的比较,挂水法平均耗时最短,为10.1 s/件。 结论 硅油附着眼科手术器械的清洗推荐采用95%乙醇溶液与预处理清洗剂预洗+标准清洗法;针对硅油清洗效果的评价方法推荐使用挂水法。

关键词: 眼科学, 显微器械, 清洗剂, 硅油, 清洗效果检测

Abstract:

Objective To explore the optimum cleaning methods and effective evaluating approaches for silicone oil-attached ophthalmic surgical instruments. Methods 400 pieces of silicone oil-attached ophthalmic surgical instruments were randomly allocated into 4 groups,namely group A,group B,group C and group D. The standard cleaning method was used in group A;alkaline detergent immersion and standard cleaning method were used in group B;pretreatment detergent immersion and standard cleaning method were used in group C;Group D received 95% alcohol wet gauze wiping combined with pretreatment detergent immersion and standard cleaning method. The effects of 4 cleaning methods on silicone oil-attached ophthalmic surgical instruments were evaluated by 3 approaches including visual inspection,touching and water-hanging method. Results The comparison of cleaning methods shows that there were significant differences in qualified rates of silicone oil-attached ophthalmic surgical instruments among the 4 cleaning methods(P<0.001). The qualified rate of the cleaning method of 95% alcohol wet gauze wiping combined with pretreatment detergent immersion and standard cleaning method is the highest. The results of the 3 evaluation approaches for this cleaning method were as following,the qualified rate of visual comparison method with 98%,touching method with 100%,and water-hanging method with 97%. According to the comparison of evaluation approaches,the average implementation time of the water-hanging method is the shortest(10.1 s/piece). Conclusion The cleaning method of 95% alcohol wet gauze wiping combined with pretreatment detergent immersion and standard cleaning method is recommended. Moreover,the water-hanging method is suggested to be used as an approach for the detection of silicone oil residue after cleaning.

Key words: Ophthalmology, Microsurgical Instrument, Detergent, Silicone Oil, Monitoring of Cleaning Quality