The translation of the Hematology Information Needs Questionnaire and its reliability and validity test

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.01.018

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective The purpose is to translate the Hematology Information Needs Questionnaire（HINQ） into Chinese，and to test its reliability and validity. Methods The cross-cultural adaption guide of Beaton was used to translate the scale. The reliability and validity of the HINQ were tested through a survey of 362 patients with hematologic neoplasms in a tertiary specialized hospital in Tianjin by convenience sampling from October to December 2021. Results 345 valid questionnaires were collected. The Chinese version of the scale included 7 dimensions of disease（with 10 items），treatment（with 19 items），etiology（with 3 items），sleep and physical changes（with 6 items），self-care（with 7 items），medical tests and prognosis（with 11 items），psycho-social aspect（with 6 items），with a total of 62 items. In exploratory factor analysis，the cumulative variance contribution of 7 common factors was 73.963%. The item-level content validity index of the Chinese HINQ is 0.830~1.000，the scale-level content validity index is 0.949；Cronbach’s α coefficient for the overall scale was 0.986，and the Cronbach’s α coefficients of each dimension ranged from 0.903~0.976； the test-retest reliability of the total scale was 0.896，and the split half reliability coefficient was 0.917. Conclusion The scale has good reliability and validity，and it can be used as an assessment tool for the information needs of patients with hematologic neoplasms.

Key words: Hematologic Diseases, Information Needs, Reliability, Validity, Nursing Care

摘要：

目的汉化恶性血液病患者信息需求量表（Hematology Information Needs Questionnaire，HINQ），并检验其信效度。方法运用Beaton自评量表跨文化调试指南对原量表进行翻译、回译及文化调试，形成中文版HINQ。采用便利抽样法，选取2021年10月―12月天津市某三级甲等医院收治的362例恶性血液病患者进行调查，分析量表的信效度。结果回收有效问卷345份。中文版HINQ包含7个维度，共62个条目，分别为疾病（10个条目）、治疗（19个条目）、病因（3个条目）、睡眠及身体变化（6个条目）、自我护理（7个条目）、医学检查和预后（11个条目）、社会心理（6个条目）。探索性因子分析结果显示，7个公因子的累计方差贡献率为73.963%。量表条目水平的内容效度指数为0.830~1.000，平均量表水平的内容效度指数为0.949；量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.986，各维度的Cronbach’s α系数为0.903~0.976；量表总的重测信度为0.896，折半信度系数为0.917。结论中文版HINQ具有良好的信效度，可用于评价恶性血液病患者的信息需求。

关键词: 血液病, 信息需求, 信度, 效度, 护理

MA Longting, WEI Zhiqiong, WANG Linan, HAO Rui, ZHOU Xueying, ZHU Xinran, LIU Jingjing, LIU Lijuan, ZHUANG Shumei. The translation of the Hematology Information Needs Questionnaire and its reliability and validity test[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2023, 58(1): 121-128.

马龙婷, 魏志琼, 王丽楠, 郝蕊, 周雪莹, 朱昕然, 刘菁菁, 刘丽娟, 庄淑梅. 恶性血液病患者信息需求量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(1): 121-128.

Figures/Tables 1

References 26

[1]	Rood JAJ, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Eeltink C, et al. The need for information among patients with hematological malignancies:psychometric analyses of the 62-item Hematology Information Needs Questionnaire(HINQ-62)[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(8):e0201699. DOI URL
[2]	Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021, 71(3):209-249. DOI URL
[3]	郑荣寿, 孙可欣, 张思维, 等. 2015年中国恶性肿瘤流行情况分析[J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2019, 41(1):19-28. PMID
	Zheng RS, Sun KX, Zhang SW, et al. Report of cancer epidemiology in China,2015[J]. Chin J Oncol, 2019, 41(1):19-28. DOI PMID
[4]	陈诗, 刘明红, 李惠玲. 造血干细胞移植患者信息需求现状调查[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2017, 23(13):1770-1773.
	Chen S, Liu MH, Li HL. Status investigation of information needs in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2017, 23(13):1770-1773.
[5]	Uysal N, Toprak Fü, Kutlutsürkan S, et al. Symptoms experienced and information needs of women receiving chemotherapy[J]. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2018, 5(2):178-183. DOI URL
[6]	郑利仙. 癌症患者信息需求对自我效能的影响[J]. 中国护理管理, 2013, 13(8):66-68.
	Zheng LX. The influence of cancer patients’ information needs on their self-efficacy[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2013, 13(8):66-68.
[7]	Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life,anxiety and depression among cancer survivors:a systematic review[J]. Ann Oncol, 2011, 22(4):761-772. DOI PMID
[8]	Tsatsou I, Konstantinidis T, Kalemikerakis I, et al. Unmet supportive care needs of patients with hematological malignancies:a systematic review[J]. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs, 2021, 8(1):5-17. DOI URL
[9]	Alexander SC, Sullivan AM, Back AL, et al. Information giving and receiving in hematological malignancy consultations[J]. Psychooncology, 2012, 21(3):297-306. DOI PMID
[10]	Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, et al. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1980, 92(6):832-836. DOI PMID
[11]	Foot G. Measuring the unmet needs of people living with cancer[J]. Cancer Forum, 1995, 19:131-135.
[12]	Tamburini M, Gangeri L, Brunelli C, et al. Assessment of hospitalised cancer patients’ needs by the Needs Evaluation Questionnaire[J]. Ann Oncol, 2000, 11(1):31-37. DOI PMID
[13]	黄雪薇, 张瑛, 王秀利, 等. 癌症患者的信息需求:《癌症患者信息选择问卷》的编制与评估[J]. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2003, 17(11):750-753.
	Huang XW, Zhang Y, Wang XL, et al. Information needs of cancer patients:development and evaluation of Information Preference Questionnaire for Cancer Patients[J]. Chin Ment Heal J, 2003, 17(11):750-753.
[14]	Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(24):3186-3191. DOI URL
[15]	Perneger TV, Courvoisier DS, Hudelson PM, et al. Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires[J]. Qual Life Res, 2015, 24(1):147-151. DOI PMID
[16]	王家良. 临床流行病学:临床科研设计、测量与评价[M]. 3版. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 2009.
	Wang JL. Clinical epidemiology:clinical research design,measurement and evaluation[M]. 3rd ed. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 2009.
[17]	梁永春, 周海琴, 朱雪芬, 等. 肺移植特异性生活质量量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(6):688-695. DOI
	Liang YC, Zhou HQ, Zhu XF, et al. Validation of Chinese version of the Lung Transplant Quality of Life survey for lung transplant recipients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(6):688-695. DOI
[18]	周漾, 薛程, 金华怡, 等. 父亲支持母乳喂养自我效能简式量表的汉化与信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(7):1116-1120. DOI
	Zhou Y, Xue C, Jin HY, et al. The reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of the Father Support Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2020, 55(7):1116-1120. DOI
[19]	颜霞, 杨子樱, 王婷, 等. 癌症治疗功能评价:骨髓移植分量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(1):151-154.
	Yan X, Yang ZY, Wang T, et al. Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-Bone Marrow Transplant(FACT-BMT):tran-slation and reliability and validity testing[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(1):151-154.
[20]	李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012.
	Li Z, Liu Y. Nursing research methods[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2012.
[21]	Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index:are you sure you know what’s being reported critique and recommendations[J]. Res Nurs Health, 2006, 29(5):489-497. DOI URL
[22]	李雯, 魏丽丽, 张艳, 等. 产妇出院指导质量量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(2):315-320. DOI
	Li W, Wei LL, Zhang Y, et al. The Chinese version translation of the Quality Scale of Maternal Discharge Guidance and its reliability and validity test[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(2):315-320. DOI
[23]	张文彤, 董伟. SPSS统计分析高级教程[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2018.
	Zhang WT, Dong W. Advanced course on SPSS statistical analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2018.
[24]	沈子晨, 周漾, 朱冬梅, 等. 城市分娩创伤量表的汉化及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(11):1757-1761. DOI
	Shen ZC, Zhou Y, Zhu DM, et al. Translation of the Chinese version of the City Birth Trauma Scale and the test of its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2020, 55(11):1757-1761. DOI
[25]	胡雁, 王志稳. 护理研究[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017.
	Hu Y, Wang ZW. Chinese nursing research[M]. 5th ed. Bei-jing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2017.
[26]	Watson R, Bryant J, Sanson-Fisher R, et al. Do haematological cancer patients get the information they need about their cancer and its treatment results of a cross-sectional survey[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2019, 27(4):1509-1517. DOI URL