Best evidence-based practice for promoting early mobilization in maternal women after cesarean：an interrupt time series study

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.05.001

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective This study aims to implement the best evidence of early mobilization in maternal women after cesarean in China’s clinical settings and to evaluate the effectiveness of the evidence-based nursing protocol.Methods The Evidence-based Continuous Quality Improvement Framework was used as the conceptual model. The process consisted of 4 steps including evidence acquisition,baseline evaluation,evidence introduction,and after-effect evaluation. From February 2019 to January 2020,an interruption time series design was applied in postpartum women to assess the changes of length of out-of-bed mobilization,24-hour out-of-bed rate,incidence of intestinal obstruction,and length of post-operative hospitalization.Results We finally included 8 pieces of evidence in protocol. The percentage of people with a pain score of <3 increased from 74.37% to 83.68%（ χ ²=1.77,P=0.041）;The length of out-of-bed mobilization decreased from 31.89±9.50 hours to 20.01±4.65 hours（t=11.48,P<0.001）. The 24-hour out of bed rate increased from 30.94% to 91.21%（ χ²=17.28,P<0.001）;the incidence of intestinal obstruction decreased from 5.31% to 1.70%（ χ²=2.17,P=0.015） and the average days of postoperative hospital stay decreased from 5.06±1.99 days to 3.51±0.99 days（t=10.74,P<0.001）.Conclusion The best evidence-based practice can promote early mobilization in maternal women after cesarean section,reduce the incidence of intestinal obstruction effectively,and shorten hospital stay significantly.

Key words: Cesarean Section, Postoperative, Early Mobilization, Obstetrical Nursing, Evidence-Based Nursing

摘要：

目的基于剖宫产术后产妇早期离床活动的证据,实施循证实践,并验证其在改善剖宫产术后产妇早期离床活动中的作用。方法以基于证据的持续质量改进模型为研究框架,于2019年2月—2020年1月通过证据获取、现况审查、证据引入和效果评价4个阶段将循证实践应用于剖宫产术后产妇,并采用中断时间序列设计,比较循证实践应用前后两组疼痛情况、首次离床活动时间、术后24 h离床率、肠梗阻发生率及术后住院时间。结果最终纳入8条证据,共12条审查指标。循证实践后,剖宫产术后产妇疼痛评分<3分的人数百分比由74.37%提升至83.68%,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义（ χ²=1.77,P=0.041）;首次离床活动时间从（31.89±9.50） h缩短至（20.01±4.65） h,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义（t=11.48,P<0.001）;术后24 h离床率由30.94%提高至91.21%,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义（ χ²=17.28,P<0.001）;肠梗阻发生率由5.31%下降至1.70%,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义（ χ²=2.17,P=0.015）;术后住院时间由（5.06±1.99） d下降至（3.51±0.99） d,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义（t=10.74,P<0.001）。结论基于证据的循证实践能够促进剖宫产术后产妇的早期离床活动,有效降低术后肠梗阻发生率,缩短术后住院天数。

关键词: 剖宫产术, 术后, 早期离床, 产科护理, 循证护理

CHEN Yun,WAN Jing,ZHU Zheng,SU Chunhong,MEI Zhengrong,WANG Shouping,TAN Xiangping,KONG Yingshi. Best evidence-based practice for promoting early mobilization in maternal women after cesarean：an interrupt time series study[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2021, 56(5): 645-651.

陈云,万静,朱政,苏春宏,梅峥嵘,王寿平,谭湘萍,孔颖诗. 促进剖宫产术后产妇早期离床活动的循证实践[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 645-651.

Figures/Tables 3

Table 1 evidence content,examination index and examination method of promoting early ambulation of parturients after cesarean section

Table 2 Comparison of the implementation of early out of bed activity review indicators before and after evidence-based practice（%）

Table 3 Comparison of pain, first time out of bed time,24 hour out of bed rate, incidence of intestinal obstruction and length of hospital stay after cesarean section before and after evidence-based practice

References 20

[1]	Huang J, Cao C, Nelson G, et al. A review of enhanced recovery after surgery principles used for scheduled caesarean delivery[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2019,41(12):1775-1788. DOI URL
[2]	Lucylynn L. Abdominal surgery：early mobilization（enhanced recovery after surgery）[EB/OL]. (2018-03-15)[2020-11-21]. http://ovidsp.dc2.ovid.com/ovid-a/ovidweb.cgi?&S=DOCKFPFIEAEBHEGLJPAKIFHGCKDNAA00&Link+Set=S.sh.21%7c1%7csl_190.
[3]	Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology:enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)Society recommendations-2019 update[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2019,29(4):651-668. DOI URL
[4]	Macones GA, Caughey AB, Wood SL, et al. Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery：enhanced recovery after surgery（ERAS）society recommendations（part 3）[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019,221(3):247.e1-247.e9. DOI URL
[5]	中华医学会妇产科学分会加速康复外科协作组. 妇科手术加速康复的中国专家共识[J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2019,54(2):73-79.
	Cooperative Group of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery,Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Chinese Medical Association. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gynecologic surgery[J]. Chin J Obstet Gynecol, 2019,54(2):73-79.
[6]	陈凛, 陈亚进, 董海龙, 等. 加速康复外科中国专家共识及路径管理指南(2018版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018,38(1):1-20.
	Chen L, Chen YJ, Dong HL, et al. Chinese consensus and clinical guidelines for enhanced recovery after surgery(2018 editon)[J]. Chin J Pract Surg, 2018,38(1):1-20.
[7]	黄海燕, 赵雨君, 顾宏梅, 等. 剖宫产术后产妇早期下床活动情况及影响因素[J]. 循证护理, 2017,3(6):625-627.
	Huang HY, Zhao YJ, Gu HM, et al. The status and influencing factors of early ambulation for gravida after caesarean section[J]. Chin Evid-Based Nurs, 2017,3(6):625-627.
[8]	周英凤, 胡雁, 顾莺, 等. 基于证据的持续质量改进模式图的构建[J]. 中国循证医学杂志, 2017,17(5):603-606.
	Zhou YF, Hu Y, Gu Y, et al. The framework of evidence-based continued quality improvement[J]. Chin J Evid-Based Med, 2017,17(5):603-606.
[9]	朱政, 胡雁, 邢唯杰, 等. 不同类型循证问题的构成[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2017,32(21):1991-1994.
	Zhu Z, Hu Y, Xing WJ, et al. The composition of different types of evidence-based problems[J]. J Nurses Train, 2017,32(21):1991-1994.
[10]	American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin No 209:obstetric analgesia and anesthesia[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2019,133(3):e208-e225. DOI URL
[11]	于石成, 毛凡. 中断时间序列设计及其分析方法[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2019,53(8):858-864.
	Yu SC, Mao F. Interruption time series design and analysis method[J]. Chin J Prev Med, 2019,53(8):858-864.
[12]	陈孝平, 汪建平, 赵继宗. 外科学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
	Chen XP, Wang JP, Zhao JZ. Surgery[M]. 9th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018.
[13]	宋剑平, 卢芳燕, 吴小燕, 等. 肝切除术后患者早期活动的最佳证据应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019,54(8):1175-1179.
	Song JP, Lu FY, Wu XY, et al. Implementation of best evidence on early mobilization among patients after liver resection[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019,54(8):1175-1179.
[14]	齐宇新, 周钰卓, 王志, 等. 快速康复外科在关节科应用的调查[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2020,28(8):698-701.
	Qi YX, Zhou YZ, Wang Z, et al. A survey on enhanced recovery after surgery applied in joints surgery[J]. Orthop J China, 2020,28(8):698-701.
[15]	金颖, 李幸霞, 齐佳燕, 等. 加速康复外科指南在我国25个省份三级甲等医院妇科的应用情况调查[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018,53(9):1084-1088.
	Jin Y, Li XX, Qi JY, et al. Survey on implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines among gynecologic patients in tertiary hospitals in China[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2018,53(9):1084-1088.
[16]	罗先武, 谭初花. 三级甲等医院腹部外科医护人员实施快速康复外科阻碍因素的研究[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2020,26(4):429-434.
	Luo XW, Tan CH. Implementation barriers of enhanced recovery after surgery among medical staff of abdominal surgery in tertiary hospitals[J]. Chin J Mod Nurs, 2020,26(4):429-434.
[17]	徐虹霞, 潘红英, 王宏伟, 等. 加速康复外科实施过程中导航护士角色的设立及实践[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2017,52(5):530-534.
	Xu HX, Pan HY, Wang HW, et al. The establishment and practice of the role of nurse navigator in multidisciplinary team for enhanced recovery after surgery[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2017,52(5):530-534.
[18]	Richebé P, Brulotte V, Raft J. Pharmacological strategies in multimodal analgesia for adults scheduled for ambulatory surgery[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2019,32(6):720-726. DOI URL
[19]	Smith TW Jr, Wang XJ Jr, Singer MA Jr, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery:a clinical review of implementation across multiple surgical subspecialties[J]. Am J Surg, 2020,219(3):530-534. DOI URL
[20]	Kalogera E, Nelson G, Liu J, et al. Surgical technical evidence review for gynecologic surgery conducted for the agency for healthcare research and quality safety program for improving surgical care and recovery[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018,219(6):563.