中华护理杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (17): 2100-2107.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.17.008
收稿日期:
2023-12-13
出版日期:
2024-09-10
发布日期:
2024-09-02
通讯作者:
王俊杰,E-mail:wjjie2000@163.com作者简介:
张烁妮:女,硕士,主管护师,E-mail:1176856452@qq.com
基金资助:
ZHANG Shuoni(), WANG Junjie(), ZHANG Bo, LIU Xuelan
Received:
2023-12-13
Online:
2024-09-10
Published:
2024-09-02
摘要:
目的 分析急性中毒患者洗胃期间误吸风险影响因素,构建并验证急性中毒患者洗胃期间误吸风险预测模型。方法 通过文献检索与分析,归纳急性中毒患者洗胃期间误吸风险影响因素。以2020年1月—2023年6月在宁波市某三级甲等综合医院急诊科急性中毒洗胃患者为研究对象进行回顾性研究。采用R 4.2.1与Python 3.11统计软件分析机器学习中的随机森林、逻辑回归、极致梯度提升树和梯度提升决策树算法,建立急性中毒患者洗胃期间误吸风险预测模型并进行内部验证。通过混淆矩阵、校准曲线、受试者操作特征曲线、受试者操作特征曲线下面积、区分度指标Kolmogorov-Smirnov值、准确度、精确度、召回率和F1值对4种预测模型的预测效果进行评估,选择最佳模型。结果 4种机器学习算法建模结果显示,随机森林、逻辑回归、极致梯度提升树、梯度提升决策树算法曲线下面积分别为0.954(0.934~0.974)、0.878(0.843~0.913)、0.910(0.880~0.939)、0.917(0.889~0.945)。内部验证结果显示,随机森林、逻辑回归、极致梯度提升树、梯度提升决策树算法曲线下面积分别为0.910(0.864~0.955)、0.877(0.824~0.931)、0.849(0.790~0.908)、0.873(0.819~0.928)。年龄、意识状况、D-二聚体与吸收毒物时间是急性中毒患者洗胃期间误吸影响因素中重要性排序较为突出的4个特征。结论 4种预测模型中随机森林模型预测效果最好,对急性中毒患者洗胃期间误吸发生风险有良好的辨别能力,且临床应用便捷,可为医护人员采取预防性治疗措施和护理提供参考。
张烁妮, 王俊杰, 张波, 刘雪兰. 急性中毒患者洗胃期间误吸风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(17): 2100-2107.
ZHANG Shuoni, WANG Junjie, ZHANG Bo, LIU Xuelan. Construction and validation of a prediction model of aspiration risk of acute poisoning patients during gastric lavage[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2024, 59(17): 2100-2107.
表1 训练集和验证集数据急性中毒患者洗胃期间误吸影响因素比较(n=510)
Table 1 Comparison of factors affecting aspiration during gastric lavage in patients with acute poisoning between training and validation sets(n=510)
[1] | Thapa S, Dawadi BR, Upreti AR. Acute poisoning among patients presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary care center:a descriptive cross-sectional study[J]. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc, 2020, 58(227):470-473. |
[2] | 高珊. 急性中毒患者临床特征及预后分析[D]. 泸州: 西南医科大学, 2021. |
Gao S. The clinical characteristics and analysis prognosis of patients with acute poisoning[D]. Luzhou: Southwest Medical University, 2021. | |
[3] | 王晶. 全自动洗胃机在中毒急诊患者洗胃中的应用分析[J]. 中国医疗器械信息, 2022, 28(12):130-132. |
Wang J. Analysis of the application of fully automatic gastric washing machine in gastric washing in poisoned emergency patients[J]. China Med Device Inf, 2022, 28(12):130-132. | |
[4] |
Zhou Y, Tong JL, Peng AH, et al. Comparison of drug concentrations in blood and gastric lavage fluid before and after gastric lavage:a case report[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2023, 11(31):7680-7683.
DOI PMID |
[5] |
Stanca S, Ulmeanu CE, Stanca HT, et al. Clinical features in toxic coma in children[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2019, 18(6):5082-5087.
DOI PMID |
[6] | Košutova P, Mikolka P. Aspiration syndromes and associated lung injury:incidence,pathophysiology and management[J]. Physiol Res, 2021, 70(Suppl 4):S567-S583. |
[7] |
孙文静, 谢莉玲, 黄龙贤, 等. 鼻饲患者两种误吸风险预测模型的外部验证及比较[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(9):1352-1356.
DOI URL |
Sun WJ, Xie LL, Huang LX, et al. External validation and comparison of 2 aspiration risk prediction models in patients receiving nasogastric feeding[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(9):1352-1356.
DOI URL |
|
[8] | 高永祥, 张晋昕. Logistic回归分析的样本量确定[J]. 循证医学, 2018, 18(2):122-124. |
Gao YX, Zhang JX. Determination of sample size in logistic regression analysis[J]. J Evid Based Med, 2018, 18(2):122-124. | |
[9] | 中国吞咽障碍康复评估与治疗专家共识组. 中国吞咽障碍评估与治疗专家共识(2017年版)第二部分治疗与康复管理篇[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2018, 40(1):1-10. |
Chinese Expert Consensus Group on Rehabilitation Assessment and Treatment of Swallowing Disorders. Expert consensus on assessment and treatment of dysphagia in China(2017 edition) part Ⅱ:treatment and rehabilitation management[J]. Chin J Phys Med Rehabil, 2018, 40(1):1-10. | |
[10] | 刘婵娟, 常宁. 机械通气患者肠内营养并发误吸的预防及护理[J]. 国际护理学杂志, 2019, 38(15):2380-2383. |
Liu CJ, Chang N. Prevention and nursing of enteral nutrition complicated with aspiration in patients with mechanical ventilation[J]. Int J Nurs, 2019, 38(15):2380-2383. | |
[11] | Fan ZY, Jiang JM, Xiao C, et al. Construction and validation of prognostic models in critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury:interpretable machine learning approach[J]. J Transl Med, 2023, 21(1):406. |
[12] | 官艳, 王旋, 洪琳, 等. 重症急性胰腺炎患者早期肠内营养误吸风险预测模型的构建[J]. 护理学杂志, 2022, 37(8):94-96. |
Guan Y, Wang X, Hong L, et al. Construction of early enteral nutrition aspiration risk prediction model in patients with severe acute pancreatitis[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2022, 37(8):94-96. | |
[13] | 官艳, 张国娇, 罗茵. 基于机器学习算法构建重症急性胰腺炎病人肠内营养误吸风险的预测模型[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2022, 30(7):634-638. |
Guan Y, Zhang GJ, Luo Y. Establishment and validation of early enteral nutrition aspiration risk prediction model for patients with severe acute pancreatitis based on machine learning algorithm[J]. J Clin Surg, 2022, 30(7):634-638. | |
[14] | 段霞, 侯景明, 洪健, 等. 脑卒中后吞咽障碍患者发生相关性肺炎的危险因素及预测模型分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2022, 37(5):616-622. |
Duan X, Hou JM, Hong J, et al. Risk factors and predictive model of stroke-associated pneumonia in patients with dysphagia[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2022, 37(5):616-622. | |
[15] | 孙颖. 急性百草枯中毒患者XGBoost模型的构建及其对个体评估预测的法医学意义[D]. 青岛: 青岛大学, 2022. |
Sun Y. Construction of XGBoost model in patients with acute paraquat poisoning and its forensic significance for individual evaluation and prediction[D]. Qingdao: Qingdao University, 2022. | |
[16] | 张菊红, 季亚萍, 魏海霞. 基于决策树和列线图构建鼻饲病人误吸风险预测模型的研究[J]. 循证护理, 2022, 8(7):971-975. |
Zhang JH, Ji YP, Wei HX. Research on the prediction model of aspiration risk of nasal feeding patients based on decision tree and nomogram[J]. Chin Evid Based Nurs, 2022, 8(7):971-975. | |
[17] | Conzelmann M, Hoidis A, Bruckner T, et al. Aspiration risk in relation to Glasgow Coma Scale score and clinical parameters in patients with severe acute alcohol intoxication:a single-centre,retrospective study[J]. BMJ Open, 2021, 11(10):e053619. |
[18] | 米元元, 黄海燕, 尚游, 等. 中国危重症患者肠内营养治疗常见并发症预防管理专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2021, 33(8):903-918. |
Mi YY, Huang HY, Shang Y, et al. Expert consensus on prevention and management of enteral nutrition therapy complications for critically ill patients in China(2021 edition)[J]. Chin Crit Care Med, 2021, 33(8):903-918. | |
[19] | 孙文静. 住院鼻饲患者误吸风险预测模型的构建及验证[D]. 重庆: 重庆医科大学, 2021. |
Sun WJ. Construction and verification of risk prediction model for aspiration of hospitalized patients with nasal feeding[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing Medical University, 2021. | |
[20] | 李孝红, 张婷, 杨欣, 等. 脑卒中吞咽障碍患者发生误吸的危险因素研究进展[J]. 西北国防医学杂志, 2021, 42(5):397-400. |
Li XH, Zhang T, Yang X, et al. Research progress of risk factors for aspiration in stroke patients with dysphagia[J]. Med J Natl Defending Forces Northwest China, 2021, 42(5):397-400. | |
[21] | 牛芳, 张翠翠, 唐素娟. sTREM-1、BNP、D-二聚体、PCT、IL-6在老年重症肺炎中的评估价值[J]. 临床肺科杂志, 2021, 26(8):1208-1211. |
Niu F, Zhang CC, Tang SJ. Value of neutrophil BNP,D-D and IL-6 in evaluating the prognosis of elderly patients with severe pneumonia[J]. J Clin Pulm Med, 2021, 26(8):1208-1211. | |
[22] | Dong YM, Sun J, Li YX, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for assessing survival in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia[J]. Clin Infect Dis, 2021, 72(4):652-660. |
[23] | Almirall J, Boixeda R, de la Torre MC, et al. Aspiration pneumonia:a renewed perspective and practical approach[J]. Res-pir Med, 2021, 185:106485. |
[24] | Pu D, Wong MCH, Yiu EML, et al. Profiles of polypharmacy in older adults and medication associations with signs of aspiration[J]. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol, 2021, 14(5):643-649. |
[25] | 卞恒娟, 陈虎, 李景荣, 等. 早期中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值联合血清二氧化碳浓度对急性百草枯中毒预后的影响分析[J]. 中国急救医学, 2020, 40(7):601-605. |
Bian HJ, Chen H, Li JR, et al. Prognostic value of initial neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and total plasma carbon dioxide in acute paraquat poisoning[J]. Chin J Crit Care Med, 2020, 40(7):601-605. | |
[26] | Orso D, Vetrugno L, Federici N, et al. Endotracheal intubation to reduce aspiration events in acutely comatose patients:a systematic review[J]. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med, 2020, 28(1):116. |
[27] | 施笑笑, 张巧玲. 精神分裂症患者药物毒物中毒的急诊护理[J]. 中西医结合护理(中英文), 2020, 6(10):262-264. |
Shi XX, Zhang QL. Emergency nursing care of drug poisoning in patients with schizophrenia[J]. Nurs Integr Tradit Chin West Med, 2020, 6(10):262-264. | |
[28] | Ctri. Length of nasogastric tube(ryles tube) will be increased by 10 cm during insertion in patients with acute poisoning for evacuation of poison[J/OL](2019-03-05) [2023-12-01]. https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=CTRI/2019/05/018914. |
[29] | 周瑜, 米元元. ICU患者误吸研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(9):39-43. |
Zhou Y, Mi YY. Research progress of aspiration in ICU patients[J]. J Nurs(China), 2018, 25(9):39-43. | |
[30] | 傅蕊. 床旁超声评估乙肝后肝硬化患者误吸风险的预测价值[D]. 天津: 天津医科大学, 2018. |
Fu R. The predictive value of bedside ultrasound to assess the risk of aspiration in patients with hepatitis B cirrhosis[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin Medical University, 2018. | |
[31] |
Aghabiklooei A, Sangsefidi J. The effects of intravenous aminophylline on level of consciousness in acute intentional benzodiazepines poisoning in comparison to flumazenil[J]. Hum Exp Toxicol, 2017, 36(3):311-316.
DOI PMID |
[32] | 田瑞雪, 武红莉, 侯洪艳, 等. 老年重症社区获得性肺炎患者临床危险因素分析[J]. 中国综合临床, 2017, 33(1):25-29. |
Tian RX, Wu HL, Hou HY, et al. Analysis on risk factors for severe community acquired pneumonia in the elderly[J]. Clin Med China, 2017, 33(1):25-29. | |
[33] | 陈浩. 基于机器学习方法构建急性A型主动脉夹层术后脑部并发症的预测模型[D]. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023. |
Chen H. Construction of prediction model of brain complications after acute type A aortic dissection based on machine learning method[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2023. | |
[34] | 丁坤. 基于SHAP和机器学习构建可解释性前列腺穿刺预测模型的初步研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2022. |
Ding K. Preliminary study on constructing interpretable prostate puncture prediction model based on SHAP and machine learning[D]. Jinan: Shandong University, 2022. | |
[35] | 赵瑞锋. 基于机器学习对老年心力衰竭患者再入院预测及生存分析[D]. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2022. |
Zhao RF. Prediction of readmission and survival analysis of elderly patients with heart failure based on machine learning[D]. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2022. | |
[36] | Akram S, Fazil M, Ullah K. Poppy intoxication in infants and children:hazards of a folk remedy[J]. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2021, 30(5):576-581. |
[37] |
张滢滢, 王海芳, 王玉宇, 等. ICU不同进食方式的患者误吸发生现状及特征比较[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(3):265-271.
DOI URL |
Zhang YY, Wang HF, Wang YY, et al. Comparative study on the characteristics of aspiration in ICU patients with different feeding patterns[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(3):265-271.
DOI URL |
|
[38] |
Johnson ED, Schell JC, Rodgers GM. The D-dimer assay[J]. Am J Hematol, 2019, 94(7):833-839.
DOI PMID |
[39] | Iba T, Levy JH, Levi M, et al. Coagulopathy in COVID-19[J]. J Thromb Haemost, 2020, 18(9):2103-2109. |
[40] | Song YN, Yin Z, Zhang C, et al. Random forest classifier improving phenylketonuria screening performance in two Chinese populations[J]. Front Mol Biosci, 2022, 9:986556. |
[1] | 韩冬芳, 田甜, 高畅, 张婧珺, 李小妹. 肺结核患者健康促进行为与健康心理控制源关系的混合研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1029-1036. |
[2] | 司茜茜, 王莹, 赵福云, 马晓骁, 刘均娥. A型主动脉夹层患者Ⅰ期心肺康复护理方案的构建及应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1037-1042. |
[3] | 沈支佳, 陈新宇, 钱志杰, 殷丽梅. 反复低血糖患者血糖管理行为退化特征的混合研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1043-1050. |
[4] | 王丽梅, 李露, 李玉霞, 喻鹏, 罗倩, 张翀旎. 糖尿病周围神经病理性疼痛患者运动恐惧现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1051-1056. |
[5] | 丁慧敏, 戴莉敏, 蔡冬青, 杨群. 糖尿病前期患者自我管理潜在剖面分析及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1057-1064. |
[6] | 刘海婷, 王咏梅, 郑贝贝, 蔡丽丽, 叶林斌, 吴佳芸, 宁丽, 李益民, 陈为霞. 冠心病合并糖尿病患者药物素养自评量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1065-1071. |
[7] | 陈丽霞, 施慧, 朱德政, 曾莹. 成人低血糖恐惧评估工具的质量评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1072-1079. |
[8] | 中国研究型医院学会过敏医学专业委员会, 中华医学会变态反应分会过敏性疾病护理学组(筹), 中华预防医学会过敏病预防与控制专业委员会, (执笔:王青 刘君 支凡 万文锦 田丰英 霍晓鹏 周文华 杨永仕 王田田 孙劲旅). 变应原特异性免疫治疗皮下注射护理的专家共识[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1080-1083. |
[9] | 李琪, 苏晴晴, 张瑶瑶, 王田田, 吕静, 李亚可, 李海燕. 全膝关节置换患者关节遗忘变化轨迹及影响因素研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1084-1090. |
[10] | 刘娅, 刘晓晴, 杨雪凝, 王平, 刘学奎, 罗丹. 结肠镜检查患者肠道准备失败风险预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1091-1098. |
[11] | 孙晓晴, 张爱霞, 朱珠, 樊雪梅, 梅士娟, 黄欣欣, 丛胜楠, 谢红燕. 分娩心理创伤评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1099-1105. |
[12] | 谢玉生, 黄蓉蓉, 赵雪, 马蕾, 胡雁, 杨倩, 王乾沙, 明玥. 成人重度烧伤患者肠内肠外营养的证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1106-1113. |
[13] | 李旭琴, 冯洁惠, 黄昉芳, 俞超, 梁诗雨, 王晓, 李旭芳, 朱含. 1例行机械循环辅助桥接心脏移植患者的术前护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1114-1117. |
[14] | 贾晓静, 陈一竹, 许志英, 和霞, 耿超. 1例尿黑酸尿症双膝关节置换术后患者并发急性心肌梗死的护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1118-1121. |
[15] | 顾培培, 曾妃, 兰美娟, 梁江淑渊, 郭璐瑶, 蔡凌云, 朱岩, 郭鸽. 肺移植患者衰弱影响因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2024, 59(9): 1122-1129. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||