中华护理杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (18): 2216-2222.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2023.18.006
收稿日期:2023-02-14
出版日期:2023-09-20
发布日期:2023-09-22
通讯作者:
卢芳燕,E-mail:2196032@zju.edu.cn作者简介:饶雨欣:女,本科(硕士在读),护士,E-mail:22218914@zju.edu.cn
基金资助:
RAO Yuxin(
), LU Fangyan(
), WEI Xuefu
Received:2023-02-14
Online:2023-09-20
Published:2023-09-22
摘要:
对器官移植患者重返工作状况进行评估可以及时了解器官移植患者重返工作能力、心理社会适应能力和重返工作的准备水平,有助于医护人员构建并实施器官移植患者职业康复方案,提高器官移植患者重返工作率,促进器官移植患者身心健康。该文对国内外器官移植患者重返工作评估工具进行综述,包括评估工具的主要内容、特点、优势和局限性,并对各评估工具的基本情况及临床应用情况进行比较,以期为临床护士选择可靠、合适的评估工具提供参考,为构建器官移植患者职业康复方案提供理论依据。
饶雨欣, 卢芳燕, 韦学福. 器官移植患者重返工作评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2023, 58(18): 2216-2222.
RAO Yuxin, LU Fangyan, WEI Xuefu. Research progress of return-to-work assessment tools for organ transplant patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2023, 58(18): 2216-2222.
| [1] | 郑晓敏, 蔡英华, 周海琴, 等. 快速康复外科理念在肺移植患者围手术期中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(16):2018-2024. |
| Zheng XM, Cai YH, Zhou HQ, et al. The application of enhanced recovery after surgery in the perioperative period of lung transplantation:a scoping review[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2022, 57(16):2018-2024. | |
| [2] | Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation. Organ do-nation and transplantation activities 2021 report[EB/OL]. (2022-12)[2023-02-08]. https://www.transplant-observatory.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2021-data-global-report-1.pdf. |
| [3] |
Graham CN, Watson C, Barlev A, et al. Mean lifetime survival estimates following solid organ transplantation in the US and UK[J]. J Med Econ, 2022, 25(1):230-237.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
Ibikunle PO, Rhoda A, Smith M. Structural validity and reliability of the Return to Work Assessment Scale among post stroke survivors[J]. Work, 2021, 69(3):969-979.
DOI PMID |
| [5] | 曹慧丽, 何琨. 患者重返工作准备度的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2017, 52(6):749-753. |
| Cao HL, He K. Research progress of readiness for return to work[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2017, 52(6):749-753. | |
| [6] |
Zhang D, Wang J, Tao Z, et al. Factors influencing employment rates and states after liver transplantation in China:a multi-centre cross-sectional study[J]. Nurs Open, 2023, 10(4):2582-2592.
DOI URL |
| [7] |
Kirkeskov L, Carlsen RK, Lund T, et al. Employment of patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis or kidney transplantation:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2021, 22(1):348-364.
DOI PMID |
| [8] | 黄蓉, 张青, 何重香, 等. 肾移植患者重返工作准备度现状及影响因素分析[J]. 实用器官移植电子杂志, 2022, 10(3):242-247. |
| Huang R, Zhang Q, He CX, et al. Analysis on the status and influencing factors of return to work readiness of kidney transplantation patients[J]. Pract J Organ Transplant Electron Version, 2022, 10(3):242-247. | |
| [9] | 薛梅, 梁涛, 邱建丽, 等. 心脏移植受者生存质量现状的研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2014, 49(8):924-927. |
| Xue M, Liang T, Qiu JL, et al. Quality of life in heart transplantation recipients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2014, 49(8):924-927. | |
| [10] |
Mokarami H, Cousins R, Kalteh HO. Comparison of the work ability index and the work ability score for predicting health-related quality of life[J]. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2022, 95(1):213-221.
DOI |
| [11] |
de Jong RW, Boezeman EJ, Chesnaye NC, et al. Work status and work ability of patients receiving kidney replacement therapy:results from a European survey[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2022, 37(10):2022-2033.
DOI URL |
| [12] | 马来记, 周彤, 金泰, 等. 工作能力指数表中文版的信度和效度[J]. 劳动医学, 2000, 17(2):70-72. |
| Ma LJ, Zhou T, Jin T, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Work Ability Index Table[J]. J Occup Environ Med, 2000, 17(2):70-72. | |
| [13] | Wesolowska-Gorniak K, Wojtowicz M, Gierus J, et al. The correlation of patients’ anxiety after a liver or kidney transplantation with functional and self-reported work ability[J]. Medi-cine(Baltimore), 2020, 99(18):e20108. |
| [14] |
Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Quality of life and illness perception in working and sick-listed chronic RSI patients[J]. Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 2008, 81(4):495-501.
DOI URL |
| [15] |
El Fassi M, Bocquet V, Majery N, et al. Work ability assessment in a worker population:comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability Score[J]. BMC Public Health, 2013, 13:305-314.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Jordakieva G, Grabovac I, Steiner M, et al. Employment status and associations with workability,quality of life and mental health after kidney transplantation in Austria[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(4):1254-1266.
DOI URL |
| [17] |
Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, et al. The cross-cultural adaptation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire in Canadian French[J]. Int J Rehabil Res, 2004, 27(4):261-268.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Abma FI, van der Klink JJ, Bultmann U. The Work Role Fun-ctioning Questionnaire 2.0(Dutch version):examination of its reliability,validity and responsiveness in the general working population[J]. J Occup Rehabil, 2013, 23(1):135-147.
DOI URL |
| [19] | Knobbe TJ, Kremer D, Abma FI, et al. Employment status and work functioning among kidney transplant recipients[J]. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol, 2022, 10(17):1506-1514. |
| [20] |
Melo J, Dibai-Filho AV, Rego AS, et al. Translation,cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 into Brazilian Portuguese in a general population[J]. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 2022, 20(1):17-25.
DOI |
| [21] |
Mokhtarinia HR, Shahbazi A, Abma FI, et al. Cross-cultural ada-ptation,reliability,and validity of the Work Role Functioning Questionnaire 2.0 to Persian[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2022, 44(18):5268-5276.
DOI URL |
| [22] | World Health Organization. International classification of fun-ctioning,disability and health:ICF[R]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. |
| [23] |
Ferrario A, Verga FC, Piolatto PG, et al. Return to work after organ transplantation:a cross-sectional study on working ability evaluation and employment status[J]. Transplant Proc, 2014, 46(10):3273-3277.
DOI URL |
| [24] |
Kristen AV, Ammon K, Koch A, et al. Return to work after heart transplantation:discrepancy with subjective work ability[J]. Transplantation, 2009, 87(7):1001-1005.
DOI PMID |
| [25] |
Derogatis LR. The Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS)[J]. J Psychosom Res, 1986, 30(1):77-91.
DOI PMID |
| [26] |
Blanch J, Sureda B, Flavia M, et al. Psychosocial adjustment to orthotopic liver transplantation in 266 recipients[J]. Liver Transpl, 2004, 10(2):228-234.
DOI URL |
| [27] | 姚静静. 癌症患者适应水平的横断面调查及其预测因素分析[D]. 上海: 第二军医大学, 2013. |
| Yao JJ. Cross-sectional investigation of adaptive level of cancer patients and analysis of predictive factors[D]. Shanghai: the Second Military Medical University, 2013. | |
| [28] |
Park J, Wehrlen L, Mitchell SA, et al. Fatigue predicts impai-red social adjustment in survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation(HCT)[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2019, 27(4):1355-1363.
DOI |
| [29] |
Portillo MC, Ambrosio L, Lanas MR, et al. A pilot study on the Spanish version of the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale(PAIS-SR) with carers of people with Parkinson’s disease[J]. Nurs Open, 2019, 6(3):1262-1268.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire. A comparative examination[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 1994, 73(2):103-111.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
Cumming K, O’Brien L, Harris J. Predictors of employment participation following lung transplant[J]. Aust Occup Ther J, 2016, 63(5):347-351.
DOI PMID |
| [32] |
Cowling T, Jennings LW, Goldstein RM, et al. Societal reintegration after liver transplantation:findings in alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related transplant recipients[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 239(1):93-98.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
Kelly R, Hurton S, Ayloo S, et al. Societal reintegration following cadaveric orthotopic liver transplantation[J]. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr, 2016, 5(3):234-244.
DOI URL |
| [34] |
Franche RL, Corbiere M, Lee H, et al. The Readiness for Return-To-Work(RRTW) Scale:development and validation of a self-report staging scale in lost-time claimants with musculoskeletal disorders[J]. J Occup Rehabil, 2007, 17(3):450-472.
DOI URL |
| [35] | 曹慧丽, 何琨, 齐倩倩. 中文版重返工作准备度量表在乳腺癌患者中的信效度检验[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2019, 34(7):801-807. |
| Cao HL, He K, Qi QQ. Reliability and validity of Chinese Version of Ready-To-Work Scale in breast cancer patients[J]. Chin J Rehabil Med, 2019, 34(7):801-807. | |
| [36] |
Wesolowska-Gorniak K, Gierus J, Wojtowicz M, et al. Determinants of professional activity after kidney and liver transplantation:questionnaire development and validation[J]. Transplant Proc, 2019, 51(3):651-664.
DOI URL |
| [37] | Wesolowska-Gorniak K, Wojtowicz M, Gierus J, et al. Multivariate analysis of biopsychosocial determinants of professional activity among patients after kidney or liver transplantation in Poland[J]. BMJ Open, 2019, 9(7):e29501. |
| [38] | 汪根树, 李势辉, 杨建旭, 等. 肝移植术后患者就业调查问卷的初步研制及应用[J]. 器官移植, 2013, 4(4):212-216. |
| Wang GS, Li SH, Yang JX, et al. Development and application of employment questionnaire for patients after liver transplan-tation[J]. Organ Transplant, 2013, 4(4):212-216. |
| [1] | 黄盼盼, 李丽玲, 胡晓静. 先天性心脏病婴儿早期运动康复的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(9): 1050-1055. |
| [2] | 彭颖洁, 刘艾红, 朱文莉, 梅雨欣, 周萌, 关文静. 老年人预立医疗照护计划准备度评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(9): 1146-1153. |
| [3] | 冉凌霄, 王东敏, 许珂, 王聪, 曹华, 寸薇, 蒋艳. 基于人体三维模型的生物力学仿真在压力性损伤预防中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(8): 1012-1018. |
| [4] | 靳雨佳, 江湖, 王晓萱, 易景娜, 梅永霞, 郭芝廷, 张振香, 林蓓蕾. 信息化风险沟通在心血管疾病一级预防中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(8): 1019-1025. |
| [5] | 冯伟清, 陈研博, 蔡洹, 阮嘉慧, 何秀娴, 李琨. 卒中后疲劳纵向研究的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(7): 799-805. |
| [6] | 周楠, 智诗涵, 王萌, 张惠, 张丽红, 罗茂语, 何瑛, 顾炜. 性功能障碍干预在宫颈癌患者中应用的范围综述及护理启示[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(7): 890-897. |
| [7] | 黄真真, 隋伟静, 董婧, 张君如, 张楚楚, 周泓廷, 张佳宇, 张娜, 庄一渝. 眼动追踪在ICU言语不能患者中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(6): 757-763. |
| [8] | 李海娇, 魏栋帅, 王锐炎, 刘荣勋, 张超峰, 贾杰, 位彦鸽. 音乐干预在精神疾病患者康复护理中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(6): 764-768. |
| [9] | 蒋思珊, 成琴琴, 罗听薇, 张娜, 郭俊晨, 李东雅, 李丹丹, 朱丽辉. 儿童安宁疗护质量评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(5): 611-618. |
| [10] | 田思颖, 常红. 即时适配干预在慢性病患者久坐与身体活动中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(5): 619-623. |
| [11] | 梁轶岚, 姜伟, 何小爽, 王婷, 吕亚旎. 症状科学模型在慢性肾脏疾病患者中的研究进展及护理启示[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(5): 624-628. |
| [12] | 伍慧霞, 成彗芳, 黄珊珊, 黄远思, 刘翔宇. 视觉技术在慢性病患者负性情绪评估中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(5): 635-641. |
| [13] | 王飒, 苗华丽, 李雨蔚, 王鸿伟, 乔彩彩, 宋炜婷. 10~19岁慢性病患者向成人过渡期准备度评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(4): 469-477. |
| [14] | 刘宁, 李婧菱, 左顺利, 朱秀媛, 方亦萍, 丘丽红. 烧伤患者身体意象特异性评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(4): 478-485. |
| [15] | 任雅钰, 高春华, 卢芳燕, 郑力, 王华芬. 虚拟现实技术在癌症患者心理干预中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(4): 486-492. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||