中华护理杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (11): 1345-1350.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.11.010
收稿日期:2021-10-30
出版日期:2022-06-10
发布日期:2022-06-15
通讯作者:
李峥,E-mail: zhengli@pumc.edu.cn作者简介:马睛雅:女,硕士(博士在读),E-mail: majingyaa@163.com
MA Jingya(
), WANG Dou, ZHANG Huan, ZHANG Jie, WANG Haiyan, LI Zheng(
)
Received:2021-10-30
Online:2022-06-10
Published:2022-06-15
摘要:
目的 深入了解长期护理轻度认知障碍(mild cognitive impairment,MCI)患者的护士对老年MCI患者参与临床决策的认知和建议,为促进医患共享决策提供参考。 方法 运用现象学研究法,于2020年11月—2021年2月选取13名长期护理MCI患者的护士进行半结构式深入访谈,采用Colaizzi 7步分析法对访谈资料进行分析。 结果 护士对老年MCI患者参与临床决策的认知可归纳为5个主题:①患者参与临床决策是尊重患者意愿的体现;②患者参与临床决策是综合提升护理质量的保障;③患者参与临床决策受其决策能力所限;④情绪消极应对状况影响患者参与临床决策;⑤患者参与临床决策在临床实施受阻。护士对老年MCI患者参与临床决策的建议可归纳为3个主题:①进一步激发患者的决策意识;②呼吁家属支持;③期望改善实施条件。 结论 医患共享决策具有重要的实践意义,但在临床实施中存在一定的阻碍。今后仍需加强患者的决策意识,培养护士的决策能力,完善医患共享决策的实施条件,以充分发挥护士的引导作用。
马睛雅, 王斗, 张欢, 张洁, 王海妍, 李峥. 护士对老年轻度认知障碍患者参与临床决策认知的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(11): 1345-1350.
MA Jingya, WANG Dou, ZHANG Huan, ZHANG Jie, WANG Haiyan, LI Zheng. Nurses’ perceptions of older patients with mild cognitive impairment participating in shared decision making:a qualitative study[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(11): 1345-1350.
| [1] | 张新庆. 医患“共享决策”核心概念解析[J]. 医学与哲学(A), 2017, 38(10):12-15,61. |
| Zhang XQ. Core concept analysis of shared decision-making between physicians and patients[J]. Med Philos A, 2017, 38(10):12-15,61. | |
| [2] |
Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH, de Haes JCJM. Shared decision making:concepts,evidence,and practice[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2015, 98(10):1172-1179.
DOI URL |
| [3] |
Phillips NM, Street M, Haesler E. A systematic review of reliable and valid tools for the measurement of patient participation in healthcare[J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2016, 25(2):110-117.
DOI URL |
| [4] |
Milner K, O’Connor M. Shared decision making and decision aids:an important part of evidence-based practice[J]. J Nurs Educ, 2017, 56(11):702-703.
DOI PMID |
| [5] | Petersen RC. Mild cognitive impairment[J]. Continuum Minneap Minn, 2016, 22(2 Dementia):404-418. |
| [6] |
Petersen RC, Lopez O, Armstrong MJ, et al. Practice guideline update summary:mild cognitive impairment:report of the guideline development,dissemination,and implementation subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology[J]. Neurology, 2018, 90(3):126-135.
DOI PMID |
| [7] | 孙雪, 王丽娜, 沈鑫华, 等. 信息化评估与监测技术在老年认知障碍人群筛查中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5):699-704. |
| Sun X, Wang LN, Shen XH, et al. Progress in the application of information-based assessment and monitoring technology in the screening of old adults with cognitive impairment[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(5):699-704. | |
| [8] | 李树亚, 李峥. 痴呆患者病感失认的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(3):468-472. |
| Li SY, Li Z. Research progress of anosognosia in dementia patients[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2021, 56(3):468-472. | |
| [9] | 中国痴呆与认知障碍诊治指南写作组, 中国医师协会神经内科医师分会认知障碍疾病专业委员会. 2018中国痴呆与认知障碍诊治指南(五):轻度认知障碍的诊断与治疗[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2018, 98(17):1294-1301. |
| Writing group for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment in China, Cognitive Disorders Professional Committee of Neurology Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Guidelines for dementia and cognitive impairment in China:the diagnosis and treatment of mild cognitive impairment[J]. Natl Med J China, 2018, 98(17):1294-1301. | |
| [10] |
Ho MH, Chang HCR, Liu MF, et al. Decision-making in people with dementia or mild cognitive impairment:a narrative review of decision-making tools[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2021, 22(10):2056-2062.e4.
DOI URL |
| [11] | 李峥, 刘宇. 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012. |
| Li Z, Liu Y. Nursing research methods[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2012. | |
| [12] |
den Hoek DWBV, Thodé M, Jongerden IP, et al. The role of hospital nurses in shared decision-making about life-prolonging treatment:a qualitative interview study[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2021, 77(1):296-307.
DOI URL |
| [13] |
Stormoen S, Almkvist O, Eriksdotter M, et al. Cognitive predictors of medical decision-making capacity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry, 2014, 29(12):1304-1311.
DOI URL |
| [14] |
Okonkwo OC, Griffith HR, Belue K, et al. Cognitive models of medical decision-making capacity in patients with mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Int Neuropsychol Soc, 2008, 14(2):297-308.
DOI PMID |
| [15] |
Lui VWC, Lam LCW, Chau RCM, et al. Capacity to make decisions on medication management in Chinese older persons with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer’s disease[J]. Int Psychogeriatr, 2012, 24(7):1103-1111.
DOI URL |
| [16] |
Griffith HR, Okonkwo OC, den Hollander JA, et al. Brain metabolic correlates of decision making in amnestic mild cognitive impairment[J]. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn, 2010, 17(4):492-504.
DOI PMID |
| [17] |
Mejia AM, Smith GE, Wicklund M, et al. Shared decision making in mild cognitive impairment[J]. Neurol Clin Pract, 2019, 9(2):160-164.
DOI URL |
| [18] |
Blair EM, Zahuranec DB, Langa KM, et al. Impact of patient mild cognitive impairment on physician decision-making for treatment[J]. J Alzheimers Dis, 2020, 78(4):1409-1417.
DOI URL |
| [19] |
Faiman B, Tariman JD. Shared decision making:improving patient outcomes by understanding the benefits of and barriers to effective communication[J]. Clin J Oncol Nurs, 2019, 23(5):540-542.
DOI PMID |
| [20] | Stacey D, Légaré F, Lewis K, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017, 4(4):CD001431. |
| [21] | Morris JL, Hu L, Hunsaker A, et al. Patients’ and family members’ subjective experiences of a diagnostic evaluation of mild cognitive impairment[J]. J Patient Exp, 2020, 7(1):124-131. |
| [22] |
Gomersall T, Astell A, Nygård L, et al. Living with ambiguity:a metasynthesis of qualitative research on mild cognitive impairment[J]. Gerontologist, 2015, 55(5):892-912.
DOI PMID |
| [23] | 陈丹, 宁晓东, 潘慧, 等. 家庭尊严干预在老年轻度认知障碍患者主要照顾者中的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(4):543-548. |
| Chen D, Ning XD, Pan H, et al. Application of family dignity intervention in primary caregivers of elderly patients with mild cognitive impairment[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(4):543-548. | |
| [24] | Lui VWC, Lam LCW, Luk DNY, et al. Neuropsychological performance predicts decision-making abilities in Chinese older persons with mild or very mild dementia[J]. East Asian Arch Psychiatry, 2010, 20(3):116-122. |
| [25] |
Hamann J, Bronner K, Margull J, et al. Patient participation in medical and social decisions in Alzheimer’s disease[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2011, 59(11):2045-2052.
DOI URL |
| [26] | 王雅星, 徐蕊芳, 关志, 等. 痴呆患者参与决策及决策辅助的研究进展[J]. 护理学报, 2019, 26(13):38-43. |
| Wang YX, Xu RF, Guan Z, et al. Research progress of dementia patients’ participation in decision making and decision assistance[J]. J Nurs China, 2019, 26(13):38-43. | |
| [27] |
Bryant J, Turon H, Waller A, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to increase participation in advance care planning for people with a diagnosis of dementia:a systematic review[J]. Palliat Med, 2019, 33(3):262-273.
DOI PMID |
| [28] |
Causarano N, Platt J, Baxter NN, et al. Pre-consultation educational group intervention to improve shared decision-making for postmastectomy breast reconstruction:a pilot randomized controlled trial[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2015, 23(5):1365-1375.
DOI PMID |
| [29] |
Chung MC, Juang WC, Li YC. Perceptions of shared decision making among health care professionals[J]. J Eval Clin Pract, 2019, 25(6):1080-1087.
DOI URL |
| [30] |
Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making:examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice[J]. Health Aff (Millwood), 2013, 32(2):276-284.
DOI URL |
| [31] |
Lenzen SA, Daniëls R, van Bokhoven MA, et al. What makes it so difficult for nurses to coach patients in shared decision making? A process evaluation[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2018, 80:1-11.
DOI URL |
| [32] |
Cook O, McIntyre M, Recoche K, et al. “Our nurse is the glue for our team”-Multidisciplinary team members’ experiences and perceptions of the gynaecological oncology specialist nurse role[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2019, 41:7-15.
DOI URL |
| [33] |
Wallace I, Barratt H, Harvey S, et al. The impact of clinical nurse specialists on the decision making process in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings:a qualitative study[J]. Eur J Oncol Nurs, 2019, 43:101674.
DOI URL |
| [34] | 高雅靖, 单岩, 周越, 等. 医患共享决策沟通的研究进展[J]. 中国护理管理, 2021, 21(1):156-160. |
| Gao YJ, Shan Y, Zhou Y, et al. Research progress on communication of shared decision making among physicians,nurses and patients[J]. Chin Nurs Manag, 2021, 21(1):156-160. | |
| [35] | 郑红颖, 胡嘉乐, 董柏君, 等. 医患共享决策评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018, 53(5):622-625. |
| Zheng HY, Hu JL, Dong BJ, et al. Research progress and evaluation of assessment tools for shared decision making[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2018, 53(5):622-625. |
| [1] | 何梅, 熊杰, 黄素芳, 李芳芳, 李进, 任兰兰, 陈敏. 急性A型主动脉夹层患者症状网络分析及对预检分诊的启示[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(9): 1075-1079. |
| [2] | 陈冰倩, 赵彬, 孙佳蓉, 郝四芳, 侯晓丽. 慢性牙周炎种植义齿患者口腔健康管理困境的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(9): 1087-1092. |
| [3] | 秦春兰, 吴振云, 钱红英, 赵茜, 孙锦庭. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者疾病自我控制体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(9): 1093-1098. |
| [4] | 彭颖洁, 刘艾红, 朱文莉, 梅雨欣, 周萌, 关文静. 老年人预立医疗照护计划准备度评估工具的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(9): 1146-1153. |
| [5] | 汤瑞金, 韩静, 李晓旭, 王丹. 乳腺癌患者家庭融合调适体验的质性研究及护理启示[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(8): 940-946. |
| [6] | 章子怡, 杜冰, 张荩之, 尹敏. 青少年心境障碍患者心理求助体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(8): 947-952. |
| [7] | 吴丽萍, 肖丽娜, 赖菡青, 黄倩, 郭璇, 周迅. 老年类风湿关节炎患者对跌倒警觉体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(7): 836-841. |
| [8] | 何梦欣, 陈德凤, 李蓓, 董旭辉, 李佳宝, 杨扬, 徐要凯, 梁悦语. 智能化交互式认知运动干预在老年人跌倒预防中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(7): 884-889. |
| [9] | 田君叶, 张霞, 苏莉, 孙路路, 赵瑾, 丁炎明. 专科护士培训信息管理平台的建设与应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(6): 652-658. |
| [10] | 张中宁, 沈傲梅, 漆维方, 李欣, 郑瑞双, 强万敏, 王静. 基于阶段变化理论的乳腺癌内分泌治疗患者运动依从体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(6): 696-702. |
| [11] | 唐楠, 高远, 苏清清, 宋咪, 邱晨, 邵梦琪. 老年骨质疏松患者再骨折影响因素分析及护理对策[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(6): 710-716. |
| [12] | 付琴, 张秀敏, 侯铭, 王彩虹, 李晓梅, 茆永琴, 李萍. 智能化体感运动在老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者居家肺康复中的效果评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(5): 517-524. |
| [13] | 韩明华, 赵倩, 罗明月, 何亚鹏, 张睿涵, 薛肖肖, 吴红霞. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者社会隔离体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(5): 532-538. |
| [14] | 王雯静, 郝妩媚, 台靖宇, 董倩, 郭爱敏. 慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入药物治疗体验的Meta整合[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(5): 545-551. |
| [15] | 李燕, 吴雪, 庞建美, 强万敏, 杨川川, 孙盛楠, 李静. 24个省份胸外科护士围手术期肺康复知信行的调查研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2025, 60(5): 569-574. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||