中华护理杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (12): 1499-1506.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.12.014

• 专科实践与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

妊娠期糖尿病孕妇社会资源支持量表的研制及信效度检验

杨艳(), 魏碧蓉(), 郭胜斌, 王志萍, 曾婧, 朱淑榕, 林颖   

  1. 350004 福州市 福建医科大学护理学院(杨艳,曾婧);莆田学院护理学院(魏碧蓉);福建省妇幼保健院护理部(郭胜斌),新生儿科(林颖);莆田学院附属医院妇产科(王志萍);三明医学科技职业学院医学与护理系(朱淑榕)
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-10 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-13
  • 通讯作者: 魏碧蓉,E-mail: weibr101@163.com
  • 作者简介:杨艳:女,本科(硕士在读),护师,E-mail: 745869195@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    莆田学院2020年度研究生科研项目(2020016)

Development of a social resource support scale for pregnant women with gestational diabetes and its test of validity and reliability

YANG Yan(), WEI Birong(), GUO Shengbin, WANG Zhiping, ZENG Jing, ZHU Shurong, LIN Ying   

  • Received:2021-09-10 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-13

摘要:

目的 研制妊娠期糖尿病孕妇社会资源支持量表并检验其信效度。 方法 基于社会生态模型,通过文献分析、开放式专家咨询、2轮德尔菲函询及预调查形成初始量表;采用便利抽样法,于2021年1月—8月选取福建省3所三级甲等医院的301例妊娠期糖尿病孕妇作为调查对象,对量表进行条目筛选及信效度检验。 结果 妊娠期糖尿病社会资源支持量表包括7个维度、38个条目,加上各维度的重要性评价7个条目,共45个条目;2轮函询的专家积极系数为100%、85.71%,权威系数均为0.879,肯德尔和谐系数为0.218、0.298(均P<0.001);探索性因子分析共提取7个公因子,累计方差贡献率为63.210%;该量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.935,重测信度为0.724,内容效度指数为0.970。 结论 妊娠期糖尿病孕妇社会资源支持量表具有良好的科学性和信效度,可作为医护人员评估妊娠期糖尿病孕妇社会支持情况的工具。

关键词: 妊娠期糖尿病, 自我管理, 社会生态模型, 护理评估, 社会支持, 信度, 效度, 护理

Abstract:

Objective To develop a social resource support scale of pregnant women with gestational diabetes and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on the social-ecological model,the initial scale was formed through literature analysis,open-model expert consultation,and 2 rounds of the Delphi method. The convenience sampling was adopted to select 301 pregnant women with gestational diabetes from January to August 2021 in 3 hospitals in Fujian Province of China. The items screening and the test of reliability and validity were carried out. Results The scale includes 7 dimensions,38 items,and 7 additional evaluation items of various dimensional importance,which come to 45 items in total. The positive coefficients of 2 rounds of letter consultations were 100% and 85.71%;the authority coefficient were all 0.879;the coordination coefficients were 0.218 and 0.298. The Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.935;the test-retest reliability was 0.724;the content validity was 0.970. The exploratory factor analysis identified 7 principal factors,and the accumulative contribution of variance was 63.210%. Conclusion The social resource support scale of pregnant women with gestational diabetes has good reliability and validity. It can be used as a tool for medical staff to evaluate the social support of pregnant women with gestational diabetes.

Key words: Gestational Diabetes, Self-Management, Socio-Ecological Model, Nursing Assessment, Social Support, Reliability, Validity, Nursing Care