中华护理杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (1): 46-49.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.01.007

• 临床营养护理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同输注速度对肠内营养液温度影响的研究

陈培培(),冯波(),赵振华[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">赵振华,董大伟[Author]) AND 1[Journal]) AND year[Order])" target="_blank">董大伟   

  1. 210008 南京市 南京大学 医学院附属鼓楼医院重症医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-29 出版日期:2021-01-15 发布日期:2021-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 冯波
  • 作者简介:陈培培:女,本科,护师, E-mail: 780994957@qq.com

Study on the effect of different infusion speeds on the temperature change of enteral nutrient solution

CHEN Peipei(),FENG Bo(),ZHAO Zhenhua,DONG Dawei   

  • Received:2020-09-29 Online:2021-01-15 Published:2021-01-15
  • Contact: Bo FENG

摘要:

目的 探讨人体鼻、咽、食管对经鼻胃管持续输注中的营养液的加温效果。方法 采用方便抽样法,选取2020年1月—8月在南京市某三级甲等医院重症医学科住院的42例经鼻胃管持续输注肠内营养液的患者作为研究对象,在营养液无体外加温的情况下,测量并比较患者的体温与不同输注速度(20 ml/h、50 ml/h、70 ml/h、100 ml/h、120 ml/h)下咽部、贲门部营养液温度的差异。结果 营养液速度为20 ml/h、50 ml/h、70 ml/h、100 ml/h、120 ml/h对应的咽部营养液温度分别为37.35(36.20,38.20)℃、35.40(34.20,36.70)℃、(33.96±1.80)℃、32.75(30.88,33.63)℃、(31.46±1.55)℃,对应的贲门部营养液温度分别为(37.51±0.86)℃、(37.37±0.88)℃、(37.30±0.85)℃、(37.13±0.86)℃、36.80(36.28,37.60)℃。当营养液输注速度≥50 ml/h时,咽部营液温度与患者体温的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);营养液输注速度≤100 ml/h时,贲门部营养液温度与患者体温的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);将患者体温分为3组(36.0~37.0 ℃、37.1~38.0 ℃、38.1~39.0 ℃),在营养液不同输注速度下3组患者贲门部营养液温度与其体温差值的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 人体鼻、咽、食管对经鼻胃管持续输注的营养液具有加温作用,且加温效果与营养液输注速度有关,当患者体温在36.0~39.0 ℃,营养液输注速度≤100 ml/h时,常温营养液到达贲门时温度可接近机体温度。

关键词: 护理, 鼻胃管, 肠道营养, 营养疗法, 营养支持, 护理

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the temperature change of enteral nutrition(EN) solution in pharynx and cardia during continuous feeding through a nasogastric tube(NGT) at normal environment temperature. Methods 42 patients with EN support were enrolled by the convenient sampling in the Intensive Care Department of a Level A tertiary hospital in Nanjing. The body temperature of the patients and the EN solution temperature in the NGT(in pharynx and cardia)were measured at different infusion rates(20 ml/h,50 ml/h,70 ml/h,100 ml/h,120 ml/h). Results The temperature of pharyngeal nutrient solution corresponding to the EN solution infusion rates of 20ml/h,50ml/h,70ml/h,100ml/h,120ml/h were 37.35(36.2,38.2)℃,35.4(34.2,36.7)℃,(33.96±1.80)℃,32.75(30.88,33.63)℃,(31.46±1.55)℃. The corresponding temperature of cardiac nutrient solution were(37.51±0.86)℃,(37.37±0.88)℃,(37.30±0.85)℃,(37.13±0.86)℃,36.8(36.28,37.6)℃. When the infusion rate of the EN solution was less or equal to 100 ml/h,there was no significant difference between the EN solution temperature in the cardia and the body temperature of patients(P>0.05).But when the infusion solution rate was≥50 ml/h,there were significant differences between the temperature of pharyngeal camp solution and the patient’s body temperature(P<0.05). There was no significant difference among the EN solution temperature in the cardia and the temperature variation in different body temperature groups(36.0~37.0 ℃,37.1~38.0 ℃,38.1~39.0 ℃)(P>0.05). Conclusion When the EN solution infusion rate was less or equal to 100ml/h and the body temperature ranges between 36.0~39.0 ℃,the EN solution temperature in cardia is close to the body temperature of the patient.

Key words: Nasogastric Tube, Enteral Nutrition, Nutrition Therapy, Nutritional Support, Nursing Care, Nasogastric Tube, Enteral Nutrition, Nutrition Therapy, Nutritional Support, Nursing Care