硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷的研制及信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.09.006

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的研制硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷, 并检验其信效度。方法以马斯洛需求层次理论和拉扎勒斯的压力与应对模式为理论基础, 运用文献分析、半结构式访谈和专家函询法, 初步形成硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷;通过预调查对问卷进行调整和修订。采用方便抽样法, 于2019年9月—10月选取205名福建省某三级甲等专科医院硬膜外分娩镇痛的产妇进行问卷调查, 并对其进行项目分析、信效度检验;于2019年11月—12月选取375名产妇进行验证性因子分析, 进一步检验问卷的因子结构。结果硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷包括生理舒适需求、情感支持需求、信息支持需求、技术支持需求4个维度, 共32个条目。探索性因子分析提取4个公因子, 累计方差贡献率为63.224%。平均量表水平的内容效度指数为0.969, 各条目的内容效度指数为0.833~1.000;问卷的Cronbach’s α系数为0.917, 重测信度为0.821。验证性因子分析结果显示, 模型适配良好, 该问卷因子结构稳定。结论硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持问卷具有较好的信效度, 可指导医护人员精准、有针对性地评估产妇需求, 为产妇制订个性化的护理计划提供依据, 以提高产妇的分娩体验。

关键词: 硬膜外分娩镇痛, 护理支持, 需求, 信度, 效度, 产科护理

Abstract:

Objective To develop the questionnaire of nursing support needs of women with epidural analgesia during labor, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods Based on Maslow’s theory of hierarchical needs and Lazarus’s stress and coping model, using literature review and semi-structured interviews, the pre-trial questionnaire item pool of nursing support needs for women with epidural analgesia during labor was preliminarily formed, and the questionnaire was adjusted and revised through pre-survey.Using the convenience sampling method, 205 women who gave birth in a tertiary hospital in Fujian Province from September to October 2019 were selected. The data was analyzed to determine the reliability and validity of the questionnaire. 375 women from November to December 2019 were selected for confirmatory factor analysis to further test the factor structure of the questionnaire. Results The questionnaire of nursing support needs for women with epidural analgesia during labor was formed, which included 4 dimensions, namely physiological comfort needs, emotional support needs, information support needs and technical support needs, with 32 items in total. 4 common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 63.224%. The averaging calculation of content validity index of the questionnaire was 0.969, and the content validity index of items range from 0.833 to 1.000. The total Cronbach’s α coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.917, and the total test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.821. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fits well, indicating that the factor structure of the questionnaire was stable. Conclusion The questionnaire had good reliability and validity, which can guide the medical staff to accurately evaluate the needs of women with epidural analgesia during labor, and provide the basis for them to develop personalized nursing plan, so as to improve their delivery experience.

Key words: Epidural Labor Analgesia, Nursing Support, Needs, Reliability, Validity, Obstetrical Nursing

朱淑榕, 魏碧蓉, 郭胜斌, 林颖. 硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷的研制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(9): 1318-1324.

ZHU Shurong, WEI Birong, GUO Shengbin, LIN Ying. Development and reliability and validity tests of the tool of nursing support needs for women with epidural analgesia during labor[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2021, 56(9): 1318-1324.

图/表 3

表1 硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇的一般资料

Table 1 General information of women with epidural labor analgesia

表2 硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷探索性因子分析结果

Table 2 Results of exploratory factor analysis of the tool of nursing support needs for women with epidural analgesia during labor

表3 硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷信度分析结果

Table 3 Reliability analysis results of the tool of nursing support needs for women with epiduralanalgesia during labor

参考文献 30

[1]	Grant EN, Tao W, Craig M, et al. Neuraxial analgesia effects on labour progression:facts, fallacies, uncertainties and the future[J]. BJOG, 2015,122(3):288-293.
[2]	Tzeng YL, Yang YL, Kuo PC, et al. Pain, anxiety, and fatigue during labor:a prospective, repeated measures study[J]. J Nurs Res, 2017,25(1):59-67.
[3]	Gonzalez MN, Trehan G, Kamel I. Pain management during labor part 1:pathophysiology of labor pain and maternal evaluation for labor analgesia[J]. Obstet Gynecol 2016,36(11):1-7.
[4]	Pita CP, Pazmiño S, Vallejo M, et al. Inhaled intrapartum analgesia using a 50-50% mixture of nitrous oxide-oxygen in a low-income hospital setting[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2012,286(3):627-631.
[5]	Kocarev M, Khalid F, Khatoon F, et al. Neuraxial labor analgesia:a focused narrative review of the 2017 literature[J]. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol, 2018,31(3):251-257.
[6]	沈燕, 王立新, 严菊浓, 等. 产妇在分娩过程中需求量表的初步研制[J]. 现代护理, 2006(1):62-63.
	Shen Y, Wang LX, Yan JN, et al. Preliminary development of the demand scale for parturient during delivery[J]. Mod Nurs, 2006(1):62-63.
[7]	Ford E, Ayers S, Wright DB. Measurement of maternal perceptions of support and control in birth(SCIB)[J]. J Womens Health(Larchmt), 2009,18(2):245-252.
[8]	Bryanton J, Fraser-Davey H, Sullivan P. Women’s perceptions of nursing support during labor[J]. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, 1994,23(8):638-644.
[9]	Bianchi AL, Adams ED. Labor support during second stage labor for women with epidurals[J]. Nurs Women’s Heal, 2009,13(1):38-47.
[10]	Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping[M]. New York:Springer publishing company, 1984.
[11]	Maslow A. Motivation and personality, second edition[M]. New York:Harper and Row, 1970.
[12]	Henriksen L, Grimsrud E, Schei B, et al. Factors related to a negative birth experience-a mixed methods study[J]. Midwifery, 2017,51:33-39.
[13]	代玲, 曾铁英, 袁梦梅, 等. 女性分娩创伤的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019,54(2):311-315.
	Dai L, Zeng TY, Yuan MM, et al. The hazards and countermeasures of female traumatic birth:a review[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019,54(2):311-315.
[14]	Biggs A, Brough P, Drummond S. Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory[M]. New York:John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017.
[15]	Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, et al. Defining consensus:a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2014,67(4):401-409.
[16]	张霞, 张鑫, 万晶晶. 妊娠期糖尿病孕妇自我管理评价量表的研制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020,55(10):1509-1513.
	Zhang X, Zhang X, Wan JJ. Development and psychometric test of self-management scale for patients with gestational diabetes mellitus[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2020,55(10):1509-1513.
[17]	Kwong EWY, Lai CKY, Liu F. Quality of life in nursing home settings:perspectives from elderly residents with frailty[J]. Clin Nurs Stud, 2014,2(1):100.
[18]	林妙然, 姜小鹰, 胡荣. 急性白血病患者报告临床结局量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019,54(3):350-355.
	Lin MR, Jiang XY, Hu R. Development and validation of the patient-reported outcomes instrument for acute leukemia[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019,54(3):350-355.
[19]	杨丽峰, 杨洋, 张春梅, 等. 老年人衰弱评估量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2017,52(1):49-53.
	Yang LF, Yang Y, Zhang CM, et al. Development and reliability and validity tests of Elderly Frailty Assessment Scale[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2017,52(1):49-53.
[20]	胡慧秀, 王志稳, 李颖堃, 等. 养老机构老年人关怀行为评价量表编制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2015,50(8):912-916.
	Hu HX, Wang ZW, Li YK, et al. The development and psychometric assessment of Elderly Residents-Perceived Caring Behaviors Inventory[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2015,50(8):912-916.
[21]	叶志弘, 邵静, 汤磊雯. 护理工作环境量表的研制及信效度研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2016,51(2):142-147.
	Ye ZH, Shao J, Tang LW. The development of Nursing Work Environment Scale and its reliability and validity[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2016,51(2):142-147.
[22]	史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球. 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012,37(2):49-52.
	Shi JC, Mo XK, Sun ZQ. Content validity index in scale deve-lopment[J]. J Central South Univ Med Sci, 2012,37(2):49-52.
[23]	陈平雁. 临床试验中样本量确定的统计学考虑[J]. 中国卫生统计, 2015,32(4):727-731, 733.
	Chen PY. Statistical consideration of sample size determination in clinical trials[J]. Chin J Heal Stat, 2015,32(4):727-731, 733.
[24]	Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2000,32(4):1008-1015.
[25]	王济川. 结构方程模型:方法与应用[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011.
	Wang JC. Structural equation modeling:methods and applications[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2011.
[26]	伍琳, 孙艳杰. 德尔菲法简介及在护理学中的应用现状[J]. 护理研究, 2015,29(29):3599-3601.
	Wu L, Sun YJ. Delphi method introduction and its application status quo in “nursing science”[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2015,29(29):3599-3601.
[27]	王晓萍, 李茵, 吕丹, 等. 无陪伴病房患者安全护理评价指标体系的建立[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2016,51(7):869-873.
	Wang XP, Lin Y, Lv D, et al. Development of an indicator system for evaluating patient safety and nursing management in non-accompanying ward[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2016,51(7):869-873.
[28]	Thomson G, Feeley C, Moran VH, et al. Women’s experiences of pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief methods for labour and childbirth:a qualitative systematic review[J]. Reprod Health, 2019,16(1):71.
[29]	徐蔼婷. 德尔菲法的应用及其难点[J]. 中国统计, 2006(9):57-59.
	Xu AT. Application and difficulties of Delphi method[J]. China Stat, 2006(9):57-59.
[30]	曹培叶. 护理院失能老年人长期照护需求评估量表的编制与初步应用研究[D]. 重庆:重庆医科大学, 2018.
	Cao PY. Development and preliminary application of long-term care demand assessment scale for disabled elderly in nursing homes[D]. Chongqing:Chongqing Medical University, 2018.