改良式手-膝位分娩对初产妇分娩结局和舒适度的影响

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.05.012

中华护理杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (5): 716-720.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.05.012

改良式手-膝位分娩对初产妇分娩结局和舒适度的影响

吕海荣(),暴蕾,罗莉,孙亚妮,王红利,任毓,翟巾帼()

710004 西安市人民医院/西安市第四医院产科（吕海荣,暴蕾,罗莉,孙亚妮,王红利,任毓）;南方医科大学护理学院助产系（翟巾帼）

收稿日期:2020-05-18 出版日期:2021-05-15 发布日期:2021-05-14
通讯作者: 翟巾帼
作者简介:吕海荣：女,本科（硕士在读）,副主任护师,E-mail： 105812215@qq.com
基金资助:
国家教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目(18YJC880117);陕西省科技厅基金项目(2021SF-215);西安市第四医院孵化基金项目(FZ-42)

The effect of improved hand and knee delivery position on primipara delivery outcome and comfort

LÜ Hairong(),BAO Lei,LUO Li,SUN Yani,WANG Hongli,REN Yu,ZHAI Jinguo()

Received:2020-05-18 Online:2021-05-15 Published:2021-05-14
Contact: Jinguo ZHAI

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的评价第二产程中采用改良式手-膝位分娩对初产妇分娩结局和舒适度的影响。方法选取2019年10月1日—2020年3月31日在西安市某三级甲等医院产房中心分娩的290名初产妇为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为试验组（n=145）和对照组（n=145）,试验组在第二产程采用改良式手-膝位分娩,对照组采用屈膝半卧位分娩,比较两组分娩结局和舒适度的差异。结果试验组自然分娩率高于对照组（χ²=12.590）、会阴侧切率低于对照组（χ²=48.019）、第二产程时间短于对照组（t=-2.579）、产时及产后2 h出血量少于对照组（t=-2.134）、分娩舒适度问卷得分高于对照组（t=-10.775）,差异具有统计学意义（均P<0.05）;两组新生儿窒息率比较,差异无统计学意义（χ²=0.344,P=0.995）。结论改良式手-膝位分娩可提高产妇自然分娩率,缩短第二产程时间,降低会阴侧切率,减少产后出血,提高产妇分娩舒适度。

关键词: 改良式手膝位, 初产妇, 分娩结局, 舒适度, 产科护理

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the effect of improved hand knee delivery on the outcome and comfort of primipara in the second stage of labor.Methods From October 1,2019 to March 31,2020,290 primiparas delivered in the delivery center of a tertiary hospital were selected as the study population. With informed consent,the study method of randomized controlled trial was adopted. According to the method of randomized numerical table,the study group was divided into an experimental group（n=145）and a control group（n=145）. The experimental group adopted the improved hand knee delivery position in the second stage of labor,and the control group adopted the traditional knee-bent supine position in the second stage of labor. The difference of delivery outcome and comfort between the 2 groups was compared.Results The natural delivery rate of parturients in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group（χ²=12.590）;the rate of episiotomy was lower than that in the control group（χ²=48.019）;the second labor period was shorter than that of the control group（t=-2.579）;the amount of bleeding during and after delivery was less than that of the control group（t=-2.134）;the maternal comfort was higher than that of the control group（t=-10.775）;the difference was statistically significant（P<0.05）. There was no significant difference in neonatal asphyxia rate between the 2 groups（χ²=0.344,P=0.995）. Conclusion The improved hand knee delivery position can improve the natural delivery rate,shorten the second labor period,reduce the rate of dystocia and lateral episiotomy,reduce postpartum hemorrhage,and improve the comfort of delivery.

Key words: Improved Hand Knee, Primipara, Delivery Outcome, Comfort, Obstetrical Nursing

吕海荣,暴蕾,罗莉,孙亚妮,王红利,任毓,翟巾帼. 改良式手-膝位分娩对初产妇分娩结局和舒适度的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 716-720.

LÜ Hairong,BAO Lei,LUO Li,SUN Yani,WANG Hongli,REN Yu,ZHAI Jinguo. The effect of improved hand and knee delivery position on primipara delivery outcome and comfort[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2021, 56(5): 716-720.

参考文献 21

[1]	余艳红, 陈叙. 助产学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017, 136-386.
	Yu YH, Chen X. Midwifery[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2017, 136-386.
[2]	Deliktas A, Kukulu K. A meta-analysis of the effect on maternal health of upright positions during the second stage of labour,without routine epidural analgesia[J]. J Adv Nurs, 2018,74(2):263-278. DOI PMID
[3]	Diorgu FC, Steen MP, Keeling JJ, et al. Mothers and midwives perceptions of birthing position and perineal trauma:an exploratory study[J]. Women Birth, 2016,29(6):518-523. DOI PMID
[4]	Serati M, di Dedda MC, Bogani G, et al. Position in the second stage of labour and de novo onset of post-partum urinary incontinence[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2016,27(2):281-286. DOI URL
[5]	World Health Organization. WHO recommendations:intra-partum care for a positive childbirth experience 2018[EB/OL]. (2018-02-14)[2019-01-01]. http://www.who.int/repoductivehealth/publications/intrapartum-care-guidelines/en.
[6]	刘兴会, 贺晶, 漆洪波. 助产[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
	Liu XH, He J, Qi HB. Midwifery[M]. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018, 220-344.
[7]	Zhang HY, Huang SR, Guo XL, et al. A randomised controlled trial in comparing maternal and neonatal outcomes between hands-and-knees delivery position and supine position in China[J]. Midwifery, 2017,50:117-124. DOI URL
[8]	夏华安, 付婷婷. 自由体位分娩与围生期运动[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 2019, 48-49.
	Xia HA, Fu TT. Free posture labor and perinatal exercise[M]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Science & Technology Press, 2019, 48-49.
[9]	RCOG. The management of third and fourth degree Perineal ears. Green-toP Guideline[EB/OL]. (2015-06-11)[2019-12-12]. http://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/ documents/guidelines/gtg-29.Pdf.
[10]	Kolcaba KY. Holistic comfort:operationalizing the construct as a nurse-sensitive outcome[J]. ANS Adv Nurs Sci, 1992,15(1):1-10.
[11]	The American College of Obstetriciansand Gynecologists. Opi-nion:committee approaches to limit intervention duringlabor and birth[J]. Obste Gynecol, 2017,129(2):20-28. DOI URL
[12]	厉跃红, 吴娜, 庄薇. 分娩球配合自由体位助产对初产妇产痛、分娩控制感及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2013,48(9):793-796.
	Li YH, Wu N, Zhuang W. Effect of birth ball exercise combined with free maternal position on labour pain,sense of labor self-control and gestational outcomes[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2013,48(9):793-796.
[13]	雷霞, 徐鑫芬. 不同体位分娩对会阴损伤影响的研究进展[J]. 护理与康复, 2019,18(11):42-44.
	Lei X, Xu XF. Development of impact of maternal birth position on perineal trauma[J]. J Nurs Rehabilitation, 2019,18(11):42-44.
[14]	陈兰, 王善容, 唐中娟, 等. 俯卧位分娩对分娩结局及盆底功能的影响[J]. 中国计划生育和妇产科, 2019,11(1):85-87,92.
	Chen L, Wang SR, Tang ZJ, et al. Effect of prone position delivery on delivery outcome and pelvic floor function[J]. Chin J Fam Plan Gynecotokology, 2019,11(1):85-87,92.
[15]	卢常平, 罗碧如, 姜梅, 等. 我国医疗机构开展自由体位分娩现状调查[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020,35(12):8-11.
	Lu CP, Luo BR, Jiang M, et al. Status of free posture labor in Chinese medical institutions[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2020,35(12):8-11.
[16]	颜凤, 林艳, 张慧珠. 孕晚期及产时应用生育舞蹈对产妇分娩结局的影响研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018,53(9):1035-1038.
	Yan F, Lin Y, Zhang HZ. Effects of dancing for birth during the third trimester and labor on birth outcomes[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2018,53(9):1035-1038.
[17]	Berta M, Lindgren H, Christensson K, et al. Effect of maternal birth positions on duration of second stage of labor:systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2019,19:466. DOI URL
[18]	Thies-Lagergren L, Kvist LJ, Christensson K, et al. No reduction in instrumental vaginal births and no increased risk for adverse perineal outcome in nulliparous women giving birth on a birth seat:results of a Swedish randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Preg Child, 2011,11:22.
[19]	郭琳, 丁焱, 张铮, 等. 分娩时会阴切开决策影响因素预测模型的构建[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019,54(10):1469-1474.
	Guo L, Ding Y, Zhang Z, et al. Establishment of predictive model of midwives’ decision on episiotomy during childbirth[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019,54(10):1469-1474.
[20]	Gupta JK, Sood A, Hofmeyr GJ, et al. Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2017: CD002006.
[21]	谢幸, 孔北华, 段涛. 妇产科学[M]. 9版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
	Xie X, Kong BH, Duan T. Obstetrics and gynecology[M]. 9th ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House, 2018.

改良式手-膝位分娩对初产妇分娩结局和舒适度的影响

The effect of improved hand and knee delivery position on primipara delivery outcome and comfort

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	燕美琴, 王娇, 刘亦娜, 张慧君, 任永莲. 群组孕期保健模式在妊娠期糖尿病孕妇分娩结局中的效果研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(9): 1305-1311.
[2]	朱淑榕, 魏碧蓉, 郭胜斌, 林颖. 硬膜外分娩镇痛产妇护理支持需求问卷的研制及信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(9): 1318-1324.
[3]	蒋阳, 沈鸣雁, 冯志仙. 1例镜像综合征并发急性心力衰竭孕妇的护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(9): 1325-1328.
[4]	金微, 肖琦, 杨凌艳, 曾铁英. 紧急剖宫产术后产妇心理健康问题的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(9): 1335-1339.
[5]	李传圣,米元元,张振宇,刘凌云,周芹,梁荔燕,初静. 1例剖宫产术后阵发性睡眠性血红蛋白尿症患者继发脾破裂的护理[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(8): 1165-1168.
[6]	陈云,万静,朱政,苏春宏,梅峥嵘,王寿平,谭湘萍,孔颖诗. 促进剖宫产术后产妇早期离床活动的循证实践[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 645-651.
[7]	申乔乔, 张正敏, 梁韵仪, 左倩倩, 童佩, 郑雅婧, 高钰琳. 助产士对围产儿死亡产妇进行哀伤辅导体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(3): 393-398.
[8]	平凌, 王珠琳, 陈菊红. 鸟巢式沐浴垫的设计及应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(3): 478-480.
[9]	孔珊珊, 邓露, 申海艳, 吕倩, 李雨珍, 郑洪. 剖宫产产妇术中低体温风险预测模型的构建及应用效果研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(2): 165-171.
[10]	钱舒华, 朱新丽, 沈蓓蓓, 周慧欣, 丁焱. 孕早期和孕晚期焦虑状态对产妇分娩方式的影响[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(2): 245-249.
[11]	刘璐, 郑琼, 钱嘉璐, 吴孟玮, 孙亚平, 余晓燕. 胎儿畸形引产孕产妇哀伤辅导需求的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(10): 1509-1515.
[12]	宋莉娟, 袁长蓉. 美国围产期姑息照护服务的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(8): 1260-1264.
[13]	龚文艳, 周璇, 侯黎莉. 足月妊娠产妇产后静脉血栓栓塞症快速评估简表的构建及预测效果检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(7): 988-993.
[14]	闫迪, 夏海鸥. 基于聚类分析的产科护理人员岗位内容研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(5): 659-665.
[15]	王莺, 吴琦, 周渝琼, 马贻芳, 孙新星. 新型冠状病毒肺炎孕妇剖宫产术护理流程的制订[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(4): 511-514.