家庭护理评估量表的汉化和信效度检验

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2019.02.007

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的翻译国际居民评估工具家庭护理评估量表（International Resident Assessment Instrument Home Care,InterRAI Home Care）,简称InterRAI家庭护理评估量表,并对中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表的信效度进行检验。方法采用Beaton简洁六步法对InterRAI家庭护理评估量表进行翻译和跨文化调试,形成中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表。采用便利取样法,选取在北京市东城区6所社区卫生服务中心门诊就诊、符合纳入标准的老年患者215例,使用中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表和改良巴氏指数量表、改良工具性日常生活能力量表、简易精神状态检查量表对社区居家老年人进行评估。结果中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.871,量表平均内容效度为1.00,评定者间信度为0.916~0.942。中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表的ADL维度与改良巴氏指数量表每个条目的Pearson相关系数为 -0.999~-0.810;工具性日常生活能力维度与改良工具性日常生活能力量表的每个条目的Pearson相关系数为-0.996~-0.962;触发认知能力问题与MMSE量表评分判断认知障碍的一致性系数为100%;使用中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估系统所触发的问题与医生诊断间的一致性是100%。结论中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表在社区居家老年人群体中具有良好的信效度,量表的稳定性好、可靠性高,可以在我国社区居家老年人群体中使用。

关键词: 家庭护理评估量表, 护理评估, 社区保健护理, 老年人身心健康评价, 老年护理学

Abstract:

Objective To translate the English version of InterRAI Home Care into the Chinese version and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods The translation and culturally adaptation of InterRAI Home Care were performed to construct the Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care. Using the convenience sampling,215 subjects who met eligibility criteria were recruited from community health care centers of Dongcheng District,Beijing. We used the Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care,Modified Barthel Index scale,Modified IADL scale,and Mini-Mental State Examination scale to assess the elderly. Results The Cronbach’s α of Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care was 0.871 which confirmed the internal consistency. The I-CVI was 1.0 for all items,and the S-CVI was also 1.0. The inter-rater reliability was confirmed by Pearson correlation coefficient which ranged from 0.916 to 0.942. The criterion-related validity was established by Pearson correlation coefficients which ranged from -0.999 to -0.810 between scores of the ADL and Modified Barthel Index scale. The criterion-related validity was established by Pearson correlation coefficients which ranged from -0.996 to -0.962 between scores of the IADL and Modified IADL scale. The criterion-related validity was established by correlation coefficient of 1.0 between cognitive disorder of CAPs and MMSE scale. The agreement coefficient was 1.0 between CAPs and doctors’ diagnoses. Conclusion The Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care was demonstrated to be reliable and valid among community dwelling elderly.

Key words: Assessment Instrument Home Care, Nursing Assessment, Community Health Nursing, Geriatric Assessment, Geriatric Nursing

田家利,刘宇,张素,王雯,公冶慧娟,张欣. 家庭护理评估量表的汉化和信效度检验[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(2): 199-205.

TIAN Jiali,LIU Yu,ZHANG Su,WANG Wen,GONGYE Huijuan,ZHANG Xin. Translation and reliability and validity testing of Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2019, 54(2): 199-205.

图/表 2

参考文献 25

[1]	民政部. 关于全面推进居家养老服务工作的意见[EB/OL].( 2008 -01-29)[2017-05-23].
[2]	国务院办公厅. 国务院关于加快发展养老服务业的若干意见[EB/OL].( 2013 -09-13)[2018-05-27].
[3]	OECD,European Commission( 2013). A good life in old age?Monitoring and improving quality in long-term Care[R].French:OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD publishing, 2013: 93-142.
[4]	民政部. 中华人民共和国民政行业标准MZ/T039-2013老年能力评估. [EB/OL]. ( 2013 -08-29)[2018-03-16].
[5]	Morris JN, Fries BE, Steel K , et al. Comprehensive clinical assessment in community setting:applicability of the MDS-HC[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1997,45(8):1017-1024. DOI URL
[6]	Chi-Wai Kwan, Iris Chi DSW, Tai-Pong Lam , et al. Validation of Minimum Data Set for Home Care Assessment Instrument(MDS-HC) for Hong Kong Chinese elders[J]. Clinical Gerontolo-gist, 2000,21(5):35-48. DOI URL
[7]	John PH, Gunnar L, John NM , et al. Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2008(8):277-287. DOI URL PMID
[8]	Gattinger H, Otts S, Saxer S , et al. Interrater reliability and agreement of the Swiss MDS version 2.0[J]. Pflege, 2014,27(1):19-29. DOI URL
[9]	Beaton DE . Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adapta-tion of self-report measures[J]. Spine, 2000,25(24):3186-3191. DOI URL PMID
[10]	闵瑜, 吴媛媛, 燕铁斌 . 改良Barthel指数(简体中文版)量表评定脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力的效度和信度研究[J]. 中华物理医学与康复杂志, 2008,30(3):185-188. DOI URL
[11]	Latown MP, Brody EM . Assessment of older people:self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living[J]. Geronto-logist, 1969,9(3):179-186. DOI URL PMID
[12]	Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR ,et al. Mini-mental state:a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician[J]. J Psychiat Res, 1975,12(3):189-198. DOI URL
[13]	周小炫 . 中文版简易智能精神状态检查量表在脑卒中患者中的信效度初步研究[D]. 福州:福建中医药大学, 2015.
[14]	吴明隆 . 问卷统计分析实务-SPSS操作与应用[M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010: 207, 244.
[15]	郭金玉, 李峥 . 量表引进的过程及评价标准[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2012,47(3):283-285. DOI URL
[16]	李峥, 刘宇 . 护理学研究方法[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 72.
[17]	Lynn M . Determination and quantification of content validity[J]. Nurs Res, 1986,35(6):382-385.
[18]	Polit DF, Beck CT . The content validity index:are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations[J]. Wiley Inter Science, 2006,29(5):489-497.
[19]	史静琤, 莫显昆, 孙振球 . 量表编制中内容效度指数的应用[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2012,37(2):49-52. DOI URL
[20]	Morris JN. Fries BE, Morris SA . Scaling ADLs within the MDS[J]. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 1999,54A(11):546-553. DOI URL PMID
[21]	Leung DY, Leung AY, Chi I . An evaluation of the factor structure of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Involvement and Capacity Scales of the Minimum Data Set for Home Care for elderly Chinese community dwellers in Hong Kong[J]. Home Health Care Serv Q, 2011,30(3):147-159. DOI URL PMID
[22]	Kali S, David D, Andrea W , et al. The Minimum Data Set 3.0 Cognitive Function Scale[J]. Medical Care, 2017,55(9):68-72. DOI URL PMID
[23]	Carreau L, Niezgoda H, Trainor A , et al. Pilot study compares scores of the Resident Assessment Instrument Minimum Data Set version 2.0(MDS 2.0) Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale with the Braden Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment for patients in complex continuing care[J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2015,28(1):28-33. DOI URL PMID
[24]	Francesco L, Graziano O, Benigno C , et al. Impact of a new assessment system,the MDS-HC,on function and hospitaliza-tion of homebound older people:a controlled clinical trial[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 2001,49(10):1288-1293. DOI URL
[25]	吴芳琴, 范环, 肖树芹 , 等. 北京市社区失能老年人的照护需求及其影响因素[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2018,53(7):841-845.