养老机构与社区老年人生命晚期照护意向的比较

doi:10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2021.04.015

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的分析不同养老模式下老年人生命晚期照护意向的现状与差异。方法采用方便抽样法,于2016年10月—2017年6月,采用生命晚期照护意向问卷对福州市7所养老机构的194名老年人与15个社区的293名老年人的生命晚期照护意向进行横断面调查,并采用倾向值匹配法平衡两组老年人的基线后,分析养老机构老年人和社区老年人生命晚期照护意向的差异。结果两组老年人在首选的接受照护或死亡的场所及回避死亡问题的态度上,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组老年人对照护方式的重要程度排序、各种疾病相关信息的重要程度评价、最愿意与之讨论生命晚期照护意向的对象、在治疗无望时是否拒绝接受依赖各种生命维持治疗来维持生命等4个方面,差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论养老机构老年人和社区老年人的照护意向均以安宁疗护为主,且更愿意与家属讨论生命晚期照护议题,但社区老年人对死亡话题更敏感,老年人的生命晚期照护意向与其所处的生活情境有关。

关键词: 养老机构, 社区保健护理, 老年人, 照护意向, 倾向值匹配

Abstract:

Objective To explore the differences of End-of-Life（EOL） care preferences between nursing home residents and community-dwelling older adults in Fuzhou,China. Methods A total of 487 older adults were recruited from 7 nursing homes and 15 communities in Fuzhou during October 2016 to June 2017,and they were investigated by End-of-Life Preferences Questionnaire（EOLPQ）. Propensity score matching was used to balance the personal information of 2 groups,and the differences in the care preferences were analyzed. Results There were significant differences in the preferred places of care or death and the attitudes towards death between 2 groups（P<0.05）. There were no significant differences between 2 groups in 4 aspects,including the rank of importance in care patterns,the degree of importance in disease information,the person they are most willing to discuss EOL care with,and whether they refuse to rely on various of life-sustaining treatments when the treatment is impossible（P>0.05）. Conclusion Both nursing home residents and community-dwelling older adults prefer hospice care at the end of their life. They are more willing to discuss EOL care with their family members. However,community-dwellers are more sensitive to the topic of death. The EOL care preferences of the elderly is related to their life situation.

Key words: Nursing Home, Community Health Nursing, Aged, End-of-Life Preference, Propensity Score Matching

卫逸涛,肖惠敏,林少炜. 养老机构与社区老年人生命晚期照护意向的比较[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(4): 567-573.

WEI Yitao,XIAO Huimin,LIN Shaowei. A comparison of end-of-life care preferences between nursing home residents and community-dwellers[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2021, 56(4): 567-573.

图/表 7

表1 两组老年人一般资料比较（n=487）

Table 1 Characteristics of the elderly participants in two groups（n=487）

表2 匹配后两组老年人的相关经历比较

Table 2 The elderly participants’ health care related experience between two groups after matching

表3 匹配后两组老年人生命晚期照护方式意向比较

Table 3 The care pattern at the end of life between two groups after matching

表4 匹配后两组老年人生命维持治疗意向比较[名（百分比,%）]

Table 4 The life-sustaining treatments of the elderly participants between two groups after matching [cases（percentage,%）]

表5 匹配后两组老年人疾病信息意向比较

Table 5 The disease information between two groups after matching

表6 匹配后两组老年人医疗决策意向比较[名（百分比或百分率,%）]

Table 6 The elderly participants’ medical decision-making between two groups after matching[cases（percentage,%）]

表7 匹配后两组老年人死亡态度意向比较[名（百分比或百分率,%）]

Table 7 The elderly participants’ death attitudes between two groups after matching[cases（percentage,%）]

参考文献 12

[1]	国家统计局. 中华人民共和国2019年国民经济和社会发展统计公报[EB/OL]. （2020-02-28）[2020-04-13]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html.
	National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical bulletin of national economic and social development of the People’s Republic of China in 2019[EB/OL]. （2020-02-28）[2020-04-13]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202002/t20200228_1728913.html.
[2]	王艳艳, 宋洁, 张男, 等. 老年人死亡态度质性研究的系统评价和Meta整合[J]. 护理学杂志, 2018,33(12):91-94.
	Wang YY, Song J, Zhang N, et al. Systematic review and meta synjournal of qualitative studies on the elderly’s attitude towards death[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2018,33(12):91-94.
[3]	Fleming J, Farquhar M, Brayne C, et al. Death and the oldest old:attitudes and preferences for end-of-life care-qualitative research within a population-based cohort study[J]. PLoS One, 2016,11(4):e0150686. DOI URL PMID
[4]	祁玲, 张继荣. 不同养老模式下老年人生活质量及卫生服务需求[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2017,37(24):6216-6218.
	Qi L, Zhang JR. Analysis on the quality of life and health service needs of the elderly under different age patterns[J]. Chin J Gerontol, 2017,37(24):6216-6218.
[5]	Pfeiffer E. A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1975,23(10):433-441.
[6]	Chung YY. End-of-life preferences of elderly residents in long term care facilities[D]. Hong Kong:Hong Kong Polytechnic Uni-versity, 2014.
[7]	Chu LW, Luk JKH, Hui E, et al. Advance directive and end-of-life care preferences among Chinese nursing home residents in Hong Kong[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2011,12(2):143-152.
[8]	徐丹丹, 曾纪丽, 吴艳梅, 等. 生命末期患者及家属对“善终”看法的Meta整合[J]. 医学与哲学, 2020,41(1):35-40.
	Xu DD, Zeng JL, Wu YM, et al. Perceptions of terminally ill patients and families towards good death:a meta-analytical integration[J]. Med Philosophy, 2020,41(1):35-40.
[9]	张鹏. 中国的伦理文化与临终关怀[J]. 医学与哲学, 2016,37(12):27-31.
	Zhang P. Chinese ethical culture and hospice care[J]. Med Philosophy, 2016,37(12):27-31.
[10]	Supiano KP, McGee N, Dassel KB, et al. A comparison of the influence of anticipated death trajectory and personal values on end-of-life care preferences:a qualitative analysis[J]. Clin Gerontol, 2019,42(3):247-258.
[11]	陈志霞. 社会心理学[M]. 北京: 人民邮电出版社, 2016.
	Chen ZX. Social psychology[M]. Beijing: Posts and Telecommu-nications Press, 2016.
[12]	焦卉, 郭检生, 陈丽, 等. 机构养老老年人死亡焦虑及影响因素的研究[J]. 护理研究, 2019,33(21):3776-3779.
	Jiao H, Guo JS, Chen L, et al. Death anxiety and influencing factors of the elderly in nursing homes[J]. Chin Nurs Res, 2019,33(21):3776-3779.

[1]	张继文, 范环, 肖树芹, 杨芳宇, 吴瑛. 独居与非独居老年人居家照护未满足需求的比较研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(9): 1293-1298.
[2]	刘媛, 陈菲菲, 费文海, 徐红丽, 张家香, 林兴凤. 老年慢性病患者出院准备服务的研究进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(9): 1420-1425.
[3]	王巍,张欣,李越,聂志红,张冬梅. 压力性损伤居家老年患者医院-社区-家庭三元联动护理实践[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(8): 1225-1228.
[4]	苏孟宇,王真,张玉玺,王婷,吴金凤. 居家安宁疗护对晚期癌症患者生活质量和情绪影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(8): 1249-1254.
[5]	黄赛燕,宗晓梅,李彬,董超群,丁婷婷,卢中秋. 老年非瓣膜性心房颤动住院患者衰弱现状及影响因素分析[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(7): 1009-1014.
[6]	张雪儿,郭梦岩,夏小倩,王志稳. 居家痴呆老年人走失前后行为特征及情境因素的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(7): 1044-1048.
[7]	陈旭娟,朱晓萍,田梅梅,黄靖彪,仇荣敏,李孝红,敖莉. 老年髋部骨折术后患者肺部感染预测模型的构建及验证[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 659-666.
[8]	李晨曦,尚云峰,王丽云,杨玉琴,沈颖惠. 计算机认知训练对轻度认知障碍老年人认知功能的影响研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 667-672.
[9]	吴珍珍,张瑞,常艳,芦鸿雁. 衰弱表型和衰弱筛查量表在老年住院患者中的应用比较[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 673-679.
[10]	彭一航,谢莉玲,梁燕,肖明朝,赵庆华,喻秀丽,陈丽梅,舒灵芝. 智能药物管理系统在养老机构老年人中的应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 680-685.
[11]	高倩倩,梅凡,赵黎,陈飞,胡凯燕,尚轶,马玉霞,马彬. 老年糖尿病患者衰弱发生率的系统评价[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 686-693.
[12]	冷敏敏,赵雅洁,李立玉,李策,肖红梅,王志稳. 网络干预在痴呆老年人居家照护中应用的范围综述[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 694-698.
[13]	孙雪,王丽娜,沈鑫华,刘晓申,王思蒙. 信息化评估与监测技术在老年认知障碍人群筛查中的应用进展[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(5): 699-704.
[14]	张华果,司文腾,何宇迪,宋咪,皮红英. 老年髋部骨折术后患者跌倒恐惧心理体验的质性研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(4): 527-533.
[15]	黄欢欢, 周科嘉, 曹松梅, 陈学军, 肖明朝, 王蓉蓉, 赵庆华. 基于混合感知模型的智慧养老平台的建立与应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2021, 56(3): 421-426.