中华护理杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (7): 1060-1066.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.07.019

• 护理管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同地区助产士共情疲劳现状及其影响因素的研究

梁欣,周红,孙鑫章,邓海骏,高祖梅(),耿敬,张柳,海容,张枭霄,余勇,王璐   

  1. 434000 湖北省荆州市 长江大学医学部护理学院(梁欣,周红,孙鑫章,邓海骏,耿敬,张柳,海容);长江大学附属第一医院护理部(高祖梅,张枭霄,王璐);四川大学华西公共卫生学院(余勇)
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-31 出版日期:2020-07-15 发布日期:2020-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 高祖梅
  • 作者简介:梁欣:女,本科(硕士在读),主管护师,助产士,E-mail:453403856@qq.com

Research on status and influencing factors of compassion fatigue among midwives in different areas

LIANG Xin,ZHOU Hong,SUN Xinzhang,DENG Haijun,GAO Zumei(),GENG Jing,ZHANG Liu,HAI Rong,ZHANG Xiaoxiao,YU Yong,WANG Lu   

  • Received:2019-07-31 Online:2020-07-15 Published:2020-07-16
  • Contact: Zumei GAO

摘要:

目的 调查中国东部、中部、西部地区不同级别医院助产士共情疲劳现状并分析其影响因素。 方法 采用随机抽样法抽取中国东部、中部、西部地区中的12个省份,便利抽取52所不同级别医院,并采用目的抽样法根据纳入排除标准抽取助产士作为研究对象,采用一般资料问卷、共情疲劳量表及社会支持评定量表进行横断面调查,通过多水平统计模型分析助产士共情疲劳的影响因素。 结果 共回收489份问卷,有效问卷477份,有效回收率为97.8%。调查对象共情疲劳各维度得分为共情满意(31.64±6.47)分、职业倦怠(27.87±5.01)分、继发性创伤应激(26.21±5.70)分,其中82.6%的助产士为中度及以上共情疲劳,社会支持水平总得分(37.93±6.44)分,多水平Logistic回归分析结果显示,医院级别、子女情况、地区、是否喜欢工作氛围、经历分娩创伤事件次数、睡眠质量、社会支持程度对助产士共情疲劳程度有影响(P<0.05)。 结论 助产士的共情疲劳程度较重,社会支持水平低、睡眠质量差、工作氛围不和谐、离异或有婴幼儿的助产士共情疲劳程度较严重,西部地区及二级、三级医院助产士共情疲劳程度较重,护理管理者应根据其影响因素,采取有效措施,降低助产士共情疲劳发生率和程度。

关键词: 助产士, 共情疲劳, 影响因素分析, 横断面研究, 护理管理研究, 卫生人力

Abstract:

Objective To investigate compassion fatigue of midwives in different levels of hospitals in eastern,central and western regions of China,and to analyze influencing factors of compassion fatigue. Methods The cross-sectional survey was conducted,and a total of 12 provinces were selected in 3 economic regions of China by random sampling method. 52 hospitals of different levels were conveniently selected,and the midwives who met the inclusion criteria were recruited by the purpose sampling method. A self-developed questionnaire,the compassion fatigue scale and the social support rating scale were adopted to collect data. The influencing factors were analyzed by a multi-level statistical model. Results A total of 489 questionnaires were collected,477 of which were valid with the effective return rate of 97.8%. The scores of conscientious satisfaction,occupational burnout,secondary traumatic stress,and social support were(31.64±6.47),(27.87±5.01),(26.21±5.70),and(37.93±6.44),while 82.6% of participants reported as moderate or above level of compassion fatigue. The results of multi-level logistic model analysis showed that hospital level,child situation,region,working atmosphere,number of labortrauma events,quality of sleep,and social support were related to the degree of compassion fatigue for midwives(P<0.05). Conclusion The compassion fatigue of midwives was relatively serious,and midwives with low level of social support,poor sleep quality,disharmonious working atmosphere,divorce or young children are more likely to experience compassion fatigue. The degree of compassion fatigue of midwives from the secondary and tertiary hospitals in the western region was relatively high. Nursing managers should take effective measures to reduce the compassion fatigue among midwives based on influencing factors.

Key words: Midwife, Compassion Fatigue, Root Cause Analysis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Nursing Administration Research, Health Manpower