Chinese Journal of Nursing ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (5): 525-531.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.05.002
• Vascular Access Creation and Maintenance • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Gang(), PAN Yueshuai, MENG Yanlei, LIN Hui, WANG Rui, WAN Xiangyu, WEI Lili()
Received:
2021-09-16
Online:
2022-03-10
Published:
2022-03-01
Contact:
WEI Lili
王刚(), 潘月帅, 孟艳雷, 林辉, 王蕊, 万香玉, 魏丽丽()
通讯作者:
魏丽丽
作者简介:
王刚:男,硕士,副主任护师,护士长,E-mail: 18661805208@163.com
基金资助:
WANG Gang, PAN Yueshuai, MENG Yanlei, LIN Hui, WANG Rui, WAN Xiangyu, WEI Lili. The status of central venous catheter closure for blood purification in ICU patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 525-531.
王刚, 潘月帅, 孟艳雷, 林辉, 王蕊, 万香玉, 魏丽丽. ICU患者血液净化专用中心静脉导管封管情况的调查[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(5): 525-531.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://zh.zhhlzzs.com/EN/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.05.002
Table 1 The status of central venous catheter closure for blood purification patients in ICUs and the differences between different hospitals [case(percent,%)]
[1] | 薛秀娟, 代贝贝, 毕建伟, 等. 重症血液净化护理质量评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2020, 36(7):538-543. |
Xue XJ, Dai BB, Bi JW, et al. Construction of quality evaluation index system for blood purification nursing care in ICU[J]. Chin J Pract Nurs, 2020, 36(7):538-543. | |
[2] | 宋艳, 张沁莲, 刘义婷, 等. 成年血液透析患者不同封管液应用效果的网状Meta分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(13):52-56. |
Song Y, Zhang QL, Liu YT, et al. Effect of various locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters in adults patients:a network meta analysis[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2019, 34(13):52-56. | |
[3] |
Al-Ali F, Hamdy AF, Hamad A, et al. Safety and efficacy of taurolidine/urokinase versus taurolidine/heparin as a tunneled catheter lock solution in hemodialysis patients:a prospective,randomized,controlled study[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2018, 33(4):619-626.
DOI URL |
[4] | 韩新, 曹艳佩, 杨晓莉, 等. 经中心静脉导管血液透析患者不同种类封管液的应用进展[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2016, 31(6):507-510. |
Han X, Cao YP, Yang XL, et al. Application progress of different types of sealing fluids in patients undergoing central venous catheter hemodialysis[J]. J Nurses Train, 2016, 31(6):507-510. | |
[5] | 金其庄, 王玉柱, 叶朝阳, 等. 中国血液透析用血管通路专家共识(第2版)[J]. 中国血液净化, 2019, 18(6):365-381. |
Jin QZ, Wang YZ, Ye ZY, et al. Consensus among experts on blood access used for hemodialyis in China(2nd edition)[J]. Chin J Blood Purif, 2019, 18(6):365-381. | |
[6] | 刘云访, 喻姣花, 黄海燕, 等. ICU中心静脉导管相关性血流感染预防的证据总结[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(4):319-325,333. |
Liu YF, Yu JH, Huang HY, et al. Evidence summary for prevention of central venous catheter associated bloodstream infection in intensive care unit[J]. J Nurses Train, 2020, 35(4):319-325,333. | |
[7] |
Hill B, Smith C. Central venous pressure monitoring in critical care settings[J]. Br J Nurs, 2021, 30(4):230-236.
DOI URL |
[8] |
Parienti JJ, Thirion M, Mégarbane B, et al. Femoral vs jugular venous catheterization and risk of nosocomial events in adults requiring acute renal replacement therapy:a randomized controlled trial[J]. JAMA, 2008, 299(20):2413-2422.
DOI URL |
[9] | Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T, et al. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access:2019 update[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2020, 75(Suppl 2):S1-S164. |
[10] |
Clark WR, Ding XQ, Qiu HB, et al. Renal replacement therapy practices for patients with acute kidney injury in China[J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(7):e0178509.
DOI URL |
[11] |
Peng XB, Xie XM, Yin J, et al. Anticoagulation effect and safety observation of regional citrate anticoagulation for double-filtration plasmapheresis in critical patients[J]. Blood Purif, 2020, 49(5):542-549.
DOI URL |
[12] | 韩新, 曹艳佩, 杨晓莉, 等. 枸橼酸盐和肝素钠用于成人血液透析导管封管有效性的Meta分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2015, 30(21):88-92. |
Han X, Cao YP, Yang XL, et al. The effectiveness of citrate lock versus heparin lock for central venous catheter in adult hemodialysis patients:a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Nurs Sci, 2015, 30(21):88-92. | |
[13] |
Chang H, Gong YY, Li CX, et al. Clinical efficacy of regional citrate anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement therapy:systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Ann Palliat Med, 2021, 10(8):8939-8951.
DOI PMID |
[14] |
Yon CK, Low CL. Sodium citrate 4% versus heparin as a lock solution in hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters[J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2013, 70(2):131-136.
DOI URL |
[15] | 血液净化急诊临床应用专家共识组. 血液净化急诊临床应用专家共识[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2017, 26(1):24-36. |
Expert Consensus Group on Clinical Application of Blood Purification Emergency. Expert consensus on emergency clinical application of blood purification[J]. Chin J Emerg Med, 2017, 26(1):24-36. | |
[16] |
Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, et al. Infusion therapy standards of practice,8th edition[J]. J Infus Nurs, 2021, 44(Suppl 1):S1-S224.
DOI URL |
[17] |
Sheng KX, Zhang P, Li JW, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related complications including infectious and bleeding events in adult haemodialysis patients:a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2020, 26(5):545-552.
DOI URL |
[18] | Grudzinski A, Agarwal A, Bhatnagar N, et al. Benefits and harms of citrate locking solutions for hemodialysis catheters:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Can J Kidney Health Dis, 2015, 2:13. |
[19] |
Schilcher G, Scharnagl H, Horina JH, et al. Trisodium citrate induced protein precipitation in haemodialysis catheters might cause pulmonary embolism[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2012, 27(7):2953-2957.
DOI URL |
[20] |
Correa Barcellos F, Pereira Nunes B, Jorge Valle L, et al. Comparative effectiveness of 30% trisodium citrate and heparin lock solution in preventing infection and dysfunction of hemodialysis catheters:a randomized controlled trial (CITRIM trial)[J]. Infection, 2017, 45(2):139-145.
DOI PMID |
[21] |
Luiz MV, Scavone C, Tzanno C. The CLOCK trial,a double-blinded randomized controlled trial:trisodium citrate 30% and minocycline 3 mg/ml plus EDTA 30 mg/ml are effective and safe for catheter patency maintenance among CKD 5D patients on hemodialysis[J]. Hemodial Int, 2017, 21(2):294-304.
DOI URL |
[22] |
Huang HM, Jiang X, Meng LB, et al. Reducing catheter-associated complications using 4% sodium citrate versus sodium heparin as a catheter lock solution[J]. J Int Med Res, 2019, 47(9):4204-4214.
DOI URL |
[23] |
Polaschegg HD. Catheter locking-solution spillage:theory and experimental verification[J]. Blood Purif, 2008, 26(3):255-260.
DOI URL |
[24] |
Zhao YL, Li Z, Zhang L, et al. Citrate versus heparin lock for hemodialysis catheters:a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2014, 63(3):479-490.
DOI URL |
[25] | 马元吉, 许艳, 白浪, 等. 肝素钠与枸橼酸钠封管液在人工肝治疗肝衰竭患者的应用比较[J]. 实用肝脏病杂志, 2020, 23(1):66-69. |
Ma YJ, Xu Y, Bai L, et al. Comparison of citrate to heparin as a catheter locking solution in patients with liver failure undergoing artificial liver support therapy[J]. J Pract Hepatol, 2020, 23(1):66-69. | |
[26] |
Wei YJ, Yang JW, Boddu SH, et al. Compatibility, stability,and efficacy of vancomycin combined with gentamicin or ethanol in sodium citrate as a catheter lock solution[J]. Hosp Pharm, 2017, 52(10):685-690.
DOI URL |
[27] |
Reidenberg BE, Wanner C, Polsky B, et al. Postmarketing ex-perience with Neutrolin(taurolidine,heparin,calcium citrate) catheter lock solution in hemodialysis patients[J]. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 2018, 37(4):661-663.
DOI URL |
[28] |
Aniort J, Piraud A, Adda M, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of an interdialytic “ethanol 40% v/v-enoxaparin 1 000 U/ml” lock solution to prevent tunnelled catheter infections in chronic hemodialysis patients:a multi-centre,randomized,single blind,parallel group study[J]. BMC Nephrol, 2019, 20(1):149.
DOI URL |
[29] | 孙红, 陈利芬, 郭彩霞, 等. 临床静脉导管维护操作专家共识[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(9):1334-1342. |
Sun H, Chen LF, Guo CX, et al. Expert consensus on venous catheter maintenance[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2019, 54(9):1334-1342. | |
[30] |
Bruyère R, Soudry-Faure A, Capellier G, et al. Comparison of heparin to citrate as a catheter locking solution for non-tunneled central venous hemodialysis catheters in patients requiring renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure (VERROU-REA study):study protocol for a randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2014, 15:449.
DOI PMID |
[31] |
Lenz JR, Degnan DD, Hertig JB, et al. A review of best practices for intravenous push medication administration[J]. J Infus Nurs, 2017, 40(6):354-358.
DOI URL |
[32] | 韩柳, 杨宏艳, 刘飞, 等. 无针输液接头临床应用的最佳证据总结[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(8):1239-1246. |
Han L, Yang HY, Liu F, et al. Evidence summary for clinical application of needle-free infusion connector[J]. Chin J Nurs, 2020, 55(8):1239-1246. | |
[33] | 姜艳华, 邢唯杰, 周兴梅, 等. 连续性肾脏替代治疗患者中心静脉导管维护的最佳证据总结[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2021, 36(6):533-539. |
Jiang YH, Xing WJ, Zhou XM, et al. Best evidence summary for central venous catheter maintenance in patients with continuous renal replacement therapy[J]. J Nurses Train, 2021, 36(6):533-539. |
[1] | ZHAO Linfang, CAI Zhiyun, FAN Xiaopeng, JIANG Fengya, ZHAO Lei, ZHAO Ruiyi. Application comparison of different tip positions of midline catheters [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 517-524. |
[2] | LIU Qifen, LIU Xingling, ZHANG Shuzhen, LI Yue’e, ZHENG Jing, ZHANG Junfeng. Improvement and application of PICC subcutaneous tunnel needle [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 532-535. |
[3] | WANG Xifeng, JU Yang, YANG Yiqun. Effect of prolonging the maintenance interval for totally implantable venous access ports on complications in patients during the period of non-treatment:a meta-analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 536-543. |
[4] | LI Ke, YANG Zhennan. Research progress of PICC catheter related blood stream infection risk prediction model [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 551-554. |
[5] | CAI Lihua, LI Hong, HE Liping, WANG Lizhen. Construction and application of a nursing plan for diabetic patients with bowel preparation quality [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 555-562. |
[6] | GUO Xiaodi, ZHU Yanhua, YANG Yi, SHAN Lingling, LIU Shuhong, WANG Yuchan, ZENG Yongmei, CHEN Yanming, HU Xiling. Experience of the specialist nurse team in the multidisciplinary outpatient care on weight-loss [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 569-575. |
[7] | ZHAO Lu, LI Junling, WANG Junfeng, GU Peipei, LI Yuxue, ZHENG Liping. Investigation and analysis of factors related to dyadic coping among young and middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 576-581. |
[8] | ZHANG Boquan, ZHAO Shuang. Improvement and application of fixed device of gastric lavage pipeline [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 631-634. |
[9] | LIU Jinfeng, JIANG Qiuxia, LIU Alan, LIU Juan, BAN Chunjing. Translation and test of validation and reliability of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Disk Scale [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(5): 635-640. |
[10] | HUANG Na, ZHOU Yingfeng, LI Li, ZHU Jialei, WANG Ling, ZHAO Minhui. A qualitative study on the motivation of blood glucose management behavior changes in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(4): 389-394. |
[11] | QIN Jingwen, XIONG Juanjuan, PAN Xin, GONG Kaizheng. The status and influencing factors of kinesiophobia in elderly patients with chronic heart failure [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(4): 408-414. |
[12] | REN Hui, ZHANG Zhenxiang, LIN Beilei, LUAN Wenyan, MEI Yongxia. Research progress on nurse-led risk communication strategies for high-risk groups of cardiovascular diseases [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(4): 431-436. |
[13] | HANG Ying, LIU Machao. Research progress on influencing factors and interventions of patients returning to work after percutaneous coronary intervention [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(4): 437-443. |
[14] | LI Li, YAN Yan, FANG Xin, ZHAI Yonghua. Establishment and validation of a risk prediction model for intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(4): 463-468. |
[15] | ZHENG Fenshan, CAO Peiying, HUA Xinglong, LI Chunyu. Development of a Needs Scale for Breast Cancer Patients and the test of its reliability and validity [J]. Chinese Journal of Nursing, 2022, 57(4): 469-475. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||