中华护理杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 713-718.DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2024.06.010

• 专科实践与研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

感染预防控制文化量表的汉化及信效度检验

李淑花(), 商临萍(), 袁丽荣, 尹文慧, 文锦琦   

  1. 030001 太原市 山西医科大学第一医院呼吸与危重症医学科(李淑花,袁丽荣),护理部(商临萍);山西工商学院护理学院(尹文慧);山西医科大学护理学院(文锦琦)
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-09 出版日期:2024-03-20 发布日期:2024-03-08
  • 通讯作者: 商临萍,E-mail:Shanglp2002@163.com
  • 作者简介:李淑花:女,硕士(博士在读),主管护师,护士长,E-mail:lishuhua-1983@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    中华护理学会2022年度立项科研课题项目(ZHKY202220)

The sinicization of the Leading a Culture of Quality for Infection Prevention Scale and the test of its reliability and validity

LI Shuhua(), SHANG Linping(), YUAN Lirong, YIN Wenhui, WEN Jinqi   

  • Received:2023-08-09 Online:2024-03-20 Published:2024-03-08

摘要:

目的 汉化感染预防控制文化(Leading a Culture of Quality for Infection Prevention,LCQ-IP)量表,进行文化调试后检验其信效度。方法 采用Brislin翻译模型对原量表进行翻译、回译,经文化调试后形成中文版LCQ-IP量表。采用便利抽样法,于2022年5月—7月对太原市5所三级医院的430名护士进行问卷调查,验证量表的信效度。结果 中文版LCQ-IP量表包括心理安全、质量优先、支持性环境、改进导向4个维度,共15个条目。该量表条目和量表水平的内容效度指数分别为0.836~1.000和0.917。探索性因子分析共提取出4个公因子,累计方差贡献率为76.088%。验证性因子分析结果显示,卡方/自由度比值为2.779,渐进残差均方和平方根为0.063。该量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.931,重测信度为0.925。结论 中文版LCQ-IP量表信效度良好,可作为临床护士感染预防控制文化水平的评定工具。

关键词: 感染预防, 质量, 文化, 信度, 效度, 护理

Abstract:

Objective To translate the Leading a Culture of Quality for Infection Prevention (LCQ-IP) Scale into Chinese,and to test its reliability and validity. Methods The English version of LCQ-IP scale was translated into Chinese and back translated according to the Brislin model. The Chinese version of the scale was determined after cross-cultural adaptation and pre-experiment. A convenient sampling method was used to investigate 430 nurses from 5 tertiary A hospitals in Taiyuan City from May to July 2022 to analyze the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The Chinese version of LCQ-IP scale included psychological safety,quality priority,supportive environment and improvement orientation,with a total of 15 items. The content validity and the content validity index of the item level of the scale was 0.836-1.000 and 0.917. Totally 4 common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 76.088%. By confirmatory factor analysis,the chi-square/DOF ratio is 2.779,and the mean square and square root of progressive residuals are 0.063. The Cronbach’s α coefficient of this scale was 0.931,and the retest reliability was 0.925. Conclusion The Chinese version of LCQ-IP scale has good reliability and validity,and it can be used as an evaluation tool for a culture of quality for infection prevention.

Key words: Infection Prevention, Quality, Culture, Reliability, Validity, Nursing Care