中华护理杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (12): 1421-1426.DOI: 10.376/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.12.002

• 安全管理专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

肠外营养安全输注专家共识

中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会护理学组, (执笔:李素云(), 邵小平, 唐小丽, 叶向红, 谌永毅, 晏蓉, 刘云访, 孔珊珊, 熊照玉, 熊紫薇, 米元元, 黄海燕, 史雯嘉, 吴蓓雯)()   

  1. 430000 武汉市 华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院外科(李素云,晏蓉,刘云访,孔珊珊,熊照玉,熊紫薇,史雯嘉),重症医学科(米元元,黄海燕);上海交通大学附属第六人民医院护理部(邵小平);四川省肿瘤医院肝胆胰外科(唐小丽);东部战区总医院全军普通外科研究所(叶向红);中南大学湘雅医学院附属肿瘤医院院长办公室(谌永毅);上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院护理部(吴蓓雯)
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-04 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-13
  • 通讯作者: 吴蓓雯,E-mail:gaoan2005new@163.com
  • 作者简介:李素云:女,博士,主任护师,总护士长,E-mail:lisuyun0503@163.com

Expert consensus on parenteral nutrition safety infusion

Chinese Medical Association of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Nursing Group, (Writing Committee:LI Suyun(), SHAO Xiaoping, TANG Xiaoli, YE Xiang-hong, CHEN Yongyi, YAN Rong, LIU Yunfang, KONG Shanshan, XIONG Zhaoyu, XIONG Ziwei, MI Yuan-yuan, HUANG Haiyan, SHI Wenjia, WU Beiwen)()   

  • Received:2022-01-04 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-13

摘要:

目的 形成《肠外营养安全输注专家共识》(以下简称《共识》),规范临床肠外营养安全输注操作流程,以减少肠外营养相关并发症的发生。 方法 以循证实践为指导,系统检索UpToDate、BMJ Best Practjce、英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所、国际指南网、美国指南网、加拿大安大略注册护士协会、苏格兰院际间指南网、欧洲肠外肠内营养学会、美国肠外肠内营养学会、中华医学会肠外肠内营养学分会、中国医脉通指南网、澳大利亚乔安娜布里格斯研究所循证卫生保健数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库、万方数据库、中国知网、PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase等中有关肠外营养安全输注的高质量证据,检索年限为建库至2021年1月。评价、提取并汇总该领域的相关推荐建议,形成《共识》初稿,通过2轮专家函询和2次专家论证会议,结合专家意见修改完善各条目内容,形成《共识》终稿。 结果 2轮专家函询的专家积极系数均为100%,专家权威系数分别为81.00%和89.50%,专家意见协调系数分别为0.13和0.15。最终《共识》包括多学科团队组建、肠外营养输注评估、操作规范、并发症管理4个方面。 结论 《共识》的制订可为临床肠外营养安全输注的规范开展提供指导依据,保障患者安全,提升服务质量。

关键词: 肠外营养, 安全输注, 专家共识, 护理

Abstract:

Objective To form an expert consensus on parenteral nutrition safety infusion, and standardize the operation process of clinical parenteral nutrition safety infusion,so as to reduce the parenteral nutrition complications. Methods On the basis of the evidence-based method,we searched the high level evidence about the parenteral nutrition safety infusion in databases such as UpToDate,BMJ Best Practice,National Institute for Health and Care Excellence,Guidelines International Network,National Guideline Clearinghouse,Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario,Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network,European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism,American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition,Chinese Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition,China Guide Network,Joanna Briggs Institute,China Biomedical Literature Network,VIP,Wanfang,CNKI,PubMed,Web of Science,Scopus,Embase. The retrieval period is from the establishment of the databases to January 2021. Studies were evaluated and collected; relevant recommendations and research results were selected to form the draft of the expert consensus. Experts were invited to complete 2 rounds of Delphi expert consultations and 2 rounds of expert meetings. Each item was revised and improved through 2 rounds of Delphi expert consultations and expert meetings,and the final draft of the consensus was formed. Results The positive coefficient of experts in the 2 rounds of correspondence consultations were 100%; the expert authority coefficients were 81.00% and 89.50% respectively,and the coordination coefficients of expert opinions were 0.13 and 0.15 respectively. Finally,the consensus summarizes the latest evidence on 4 aspects of multidisciplinary team formation,evaluation,operation norms,and complication management. Conclusion The establishment of the consensus can provide a reference for the standardization of safe infusion of parenteral nutrition in clinical practice to ensure patient safety and improve service quality.

Key words: Parenteral Nutrition, Safe Infusion, Expert Consensus, Nursing Care